Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: RPS Twin Plate Carbon-Carbon Clutch Experiances

  1. #21
    At what power levels are you guys recommending the end case brace?

  2. #22
    One day....it will be on 4 wheels. supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Posts
    1,804
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
    I wish I had a hoist...life would be sooooo cruisy.(but I have no room for one in my single car garage)

    instead I lifted it with two jacks and held it with one of them while snuggling it in fitted like a glove will test it tonight
    Building a House, Car Mods on hold!
    1996 GTO, Owner since 2003.

  3. #23
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Location
    Syracuse, ny
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Erron Spalsbury View Post
    At what power levels are you guys recommending the end case brace?
    I wouldn't place it at a power level, rather your intentions of usage. I have not done this upgrade yet, although i may actually go the billet route.
    True 99 vr-4 modded to all hell... GT-37s-- 3.7L Strokaaaa

  4. #24
    One day....it will be on 4 wheels. supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Posts
    1,804
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
    yeah, pretty much only needed for dragging. I seem to remember Matt said he created his one when he blew out his end case bouncing off the rev limiter in gear.

  5. #25
    One day....it will be on 4 wheels. supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Posts
    1,804
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
    Back to being on topic:

    over the last two days, I pulled the GB re-lubed the shafts and re-installed the clutch. I don't know why but everything this time was perfect, easy to get the GB back up, easy to get the gb to slide into the clutch, easy to bolt back up, and low and behold at the end of it the clutch is now perfect.

    of all rofl's, my second gear syncro is now gone AGAIN...guess I'll get it replaced the next time the box is out...AGAIN.

    anyway the clutch is still a little shuddery if you try to do a reallly smooth engagement however when you learn(or when I) to match the Accellerator with letting it out fast (as opposed to being a pansy) it's fine.

  6. #26
    Banned J. Fast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    - O - SIX -

    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2,711
    Thanks
    405
    Thanked 200 Times in 140 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mitsuman03 View Post
    What you forgot to mention, and what they did not evaluate is that these transmission had no intentions to put down and handle as much power as some do today, and like any other metal that's abused over and over again after a period of long time, they weaken. For there time, they where slightly over engineered part, and where strengthened to the best of there ability..(hence the 3 ribs that seem to "strengthen" the walls of the bell housing.....hmm.wonder why they put those there? When you have a force of uncommon strength being applied at such a speed, when the gears mesh together in abrupt force, the unit as a whole will flex, causing them to push apart from each other and "mis aligning' the teeth...well..if there's no room for these errors being that the tolerance is oh so tight, i guess the only way is in the "away" direction..causing them to push apart.....well..guess what there going to push into?
    I thought I'd take the time to shoot down the hype on the billet end cover and so forth. Again, the weakness in our transmissions is in the bearing design. It has nothing to do with the type of material the transmission is composed of or it being "weak". It has to do with maint and setting it up in spec. Want to make big power? You're going to increase the gearmesh excitation freq's and compress the end bearings. Everytime you launch it the end bearing shim heights/ preleoads become a maint item and regardless of wether or not you have a billet end case the preloads and gearmesh patterns will need to be checked just like a Nascar performance engine is stripped and rebuilt every time it's ran.

    It has been proven that all meshing gears generate harmonics and vibrations. In our case we have a helical gear design and the gearmesh vibrates. The vibration should not be confused with transmission whine from the style of tooth engagement but an excitation from the gear mesh. I will state the simple findings and you can run with your idea or take the answer in the transmission design failure report I have studied along with a number of three dimensional gear vibration analysis, multi-stage gear engagement reports, Houjoh's gear-vibration study and findings models, Kato's noise defraction and reflection studes on drivetrain harmonics, and my personal experience in rebuilding these drivetrains. I am quite familiar with DSM and 3/S drivetrains and have performed a number of complete disassembly, reassembly, regear, and so forth.

    IMO the design flaw has nothing to do with the strength of the bellhousing and end cover. It has to do with the compressability of the end bearings. OEM end bearings will compress long before the end cover or bellhousing will separate (explode) from helical mesh tilting. It is aproven scientific fact that torque ripple in motors, improper bearing race shim position, and fluctuations in tooth stiffness cause excitation during gear meshing. This mesh excitiation propigates from the gearshafts to the bearings (where it is converted into a bearing force), excites the gearbox, and generates gear-vibration noise which is radiated from the surface of the gearbox. The "tuning fork" vibration traveling down the input, intermediate, and output shafts sends endstress to the bearing races and changes the preload which alters the gearmesh which in turn amplifys the gearmesh vibration. The end result is the gear teeth bind and the vibration increases and eventually the force from improper mesh blows the housing or shears the gear teeth and the transmission binds on itself and blows.

    Of course we are all entitled to our opinions. I feel my opinion is well researched and founded. Here is a screen shot of some of my research.


  7. #27
    There will be Blood! verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    1997

    Location
    In Sane!
    Posts
    4,677
    Thanks
    1,081
    Thanked 449 Times in 331 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Fast View Post
    I thought I'd take the time to shoot down the hype on the billet end cover and so forth. Again, the weakness in our transmissions is in the bearing design. It has nothing to do with the type of material the transmission is composed of or it being "weak". It has to do with maint and setting it up in spec. Want to make big power? You're going to increase the gearmesh excitation freq's and compress the end bearings. Everytime you launch it the end bearing shim heights/ preleoads become a maint item and regardless of wether or not you have a billet end case the preloads and gearmesh patterns will need to be checked just like a Nascar performance engine is stripped and rebuilt every time it's ran.

    It has been proven that all meshing gears generate harmonics and vibrations. In our case we have a helical gear design and the gearmesh vibrates. The vibration should not be confused with transmission whine from the style of tooth engagement but an excitation from the gear mesh. I will state the simple findings and you can run with your idea or take the answer in the transmission design failure report I have studied along with a number of three dimensional gear vibration analysis, multi-stage gear engagement reports, Houjoh's gear-vibration study and findings models, Kato's noise defraction and reflection studes on drivetrain harmonics, and my personal experience in rebuilding these drivetrains. I am quite familiar with DSM and 3/S drivetrains and have performed a number of complete disassembly, reassembly, regear, and so forth.

    IMO the design flaw has nothing to do with the strength of the bellhousing and end cover. It has to do with the compressability of the end bearings. OEM end bearings will compress long before the end cover or bellhousing will separate (explode) from helical mesh tilting. It is aproven scientific fact that torque ripple in motors, improper bearing race shim position, and fluctuations in tooth stiffness cause excitation during gear meshing. This mesh excitiation propigates from the gearshafts to the bearings (where it is converted into a bearing force), excites the gearbox, and generates gear-vibration noise which is radiated from the surface of the gearbox. The "tuning fork" vibration traveling down the input, intermediate, and output shafts sends endstress to the bearing races and changes the preload which alters the gearmesh which in turn amplifys the gearmesh vibration. The end result is the gear teeth bind and the vibration increases and eventually the force from improper mesh blows the housing or shears the gear teeth and the transmission binds on itself and blows.

    Of course we are all entitled to our opinions. I feel my opinion is well researched and founded. Here is a screen shot of some of my research.

    So, what then would be a solution?

    Help them, for they know not that which they do not know!
    CoopKill's Mistress Makeover Thread!
    "Punk, Nutswinging, Small Time, Asshat, Monkey, Jerkoff, Loser that rides on other peoples accomplishments!" . .

  8. #28
    One day....it will be on 4 wheels. supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Posts
    1,804
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
    Even with all that information I still don't see how you can say the Endcase does nothing, you've mentioned that the end bearings can be compressed...by how much? then what? since we can't actually adjust each of our gears to a double helix and since every gearbox practically in existance has the same design (excluding straight cut due to noise) it seems to me that the end case is a reasonable solution to the problem and while you think the problem should not exist it obviously has happened to a few people (see matt's threads)

    at the very least it's shiny

  9. #29
    Banned J. Fast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    - O - SIX -

    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2,711
    Thanks
    405
    Thanked 200 Times in 140 Posts
    When you start to develop power over say 800 to the wheels routinely check your gearmesh patterns, backlash, and preloads for all drivetrain components. Maintain them like a racecar, because effectively that's what you own with that kind of power. Service it every time you launch the piss out of it. The original car owner on our CC team owns a 1000+hp DSM. For longer than I've owned my car he's ran a stock trans, and rebuilds it 5-10 times a season.

    When you make big power inherent maint comes along with it if you drive your car for the purpose it was built for... To put down power. You could choose to drive it like a pussy and show it off at shows and the first time you are tested it will break because you overlooked some big power maint item because it was built for show and not maintained for go. Most of teh folks I run with are constantly servicing and working on their respective cars. Nearly everytime we comeback from the track we're taking something apart and maint something else, and our cars continue to develop more an more power. The more power they make the more shit we have to take apart to doublecheck everything. Our maint has increased but nothing is breaking. So it all comes down to maint and preperation.

    A simple test would be asking anyone making over 600hp how often they nut and bolt their car. Myself and anyone with common sense should do it every time the car is driven. You'd be surprised how much everything shifts and moves with that kind of power.

  10. #30
    XLR8TOR
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Check out this excellent video on properly adjusting your clutch. I learned a lot I did not know regarding adjusting the pedal linkage and using the slave cylinder to check for the exact settings on the pedal adjustments. Well worth the read.

    Could also be the problems with the clutch not fully disengaging as it should. Every one would do well to watch this one.

    Jacks Transmissions LLC — Tech Articles

    Good Luck.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering