Nice! Has anyone pushed any real power through yet? or will you be the first to open it up on this setup?
Jason

2014 Exomotive Exocet - #101 "shocker yellow" - 1.8L 5-speed 3.9 torsen FMII powered
Read more: http://mevowners.proboards.com/threa.../greg-pa-build
99 Solano Black VR4 - #16 of 287 - ground up restoration - sold
98 Pearl White VR4 #54 of 231 - 12.84@105mph - 93 Octane 12.50@107mph - 100 Octane with Chromed ECU - sold
99 Pearl White VR4 #108 of 287 - 3RD place stock car class ECG 11 - Sold
98 Black VR4: 100% stock - totalled by an Illegal 2-12-08
95 White Stealth TT - 11.852 @ 118.25 - sold
95 SSG Stealth TT - 11.981 @ 115.81mph - sold
"I don't actually work on cars, I just talk about them on the internet."
So is there any reason the EGR is disabled by default? I kept EGR on my car to help with combustion chamber temps and fuel economy... Any downsides to me putting a "1" in that box? I do have EVAP taken out though...
Also, for a 1G I'm guessing I'll have to disable "downstream O2s"?
Not sure. I wont being taking it all the way to the limit. Going to use the Evo560s still, with a base pressure of 55psi, so they will be basically 630s. Hoping to get about 17-18psi and lots of timing with the E85. I will also just adjust the injector scaling in my current pump gas tune, so I can run pump gas if I need to travel long distances etc.

Good catch! You should leave it disabled because you don't have the factory MDP sensor which the Flashable ECU uses to operate the EGR and you'll get a CE light. With the bit disabled, the valve will still function because it's operated by vacuum and throttle plate position, HOWEVER, there are some side effects without ECU control:
*won't be disabled during engine warm-up
*won't be disabled during light cruise
*won't be disabled above 4000 RPMs (not really sure what side effect this will cause to be honest)
If enough people want to keep their EGRs in their cars (better fuel mileage) I could set something up where the ECU could use the GM Map sensor. This would just be a matter of finding the table which the ECU uses to scale the factory MDP sensor and scale it for the GM sensor. Then it will work as it should.
I'm fairly certain there is a difference in the spring tension in EGRs between the earlier cars and the ones used in the OBD2 vehicles so a later gen EGR will need to be swapped in as well (could someone confirm this in CAPS?).
...and yes you need that bit disabled for the O2 sensors.
Last edited by Greg E; 03-06-2012 at 09:21 PM.
I get better fuel economy with my EGR out...I've always understood EGR was used to reduce Nox emissions, not increase fuel economy. Also EGR at WOT is bad. It will reduce power. I get the same fuel economy now as I did stock.
Hm.. Looks like I should just delete it then to be safe. I would love to reduce the clutter, just didn't want to take functionality from the car (some websites said it helps with fuel economy/temps but who knows how accurate that it. Disabling the trims and doing a lean cruise will probably more than make up for EGR anyway, huh?
Also, should I disable the bit that has to do with EVAP? Sorry for all the questions I just want to make sure all the bits do what I'm expecting them to lol
|
3000gt.com 3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop |
|
Team 3S 3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information daveblack.net |
|
Michigan 3S MInnesota 3S Wisconsin 3S Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S |
North California 3000GT/Stealth United Society of 3S Owners 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums 3000GT/Stealth International |
|
3S National Gathering East Coast Gathering Upper Mid-West Gathering Blue Ridge Gathering |
Bookmarks