Page 8 of 23 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 229

Thread: 99 Montero ECU, 92 Stealth TT

  1. #71
    Member verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    July 2005

    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    494
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 92 Times in 37 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by terrets View Post
    Ok thanks for the info. No need to be sorry. I completely understand .

    My only problem is that I already have an EMU.....No one wants to buy it either >_< So. I dont know what I am going to do. I have all winter to figure it out so thats good.

    Do you guys expect this to be ready by March/April??
    Plan is by Christmas if everything if all goes well.
    "Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary… that's what gets you." - Jeremy Clarkson


  2. #72
    Mad JDM Tite
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Location
    STL
    Posts
    624
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 88 Times in 65 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by prop7459 View Post
    The only reason I posted the stealth316 to confirm the differences between these ECU's. My intentions were not to insulate them. I do apologize if I came off like that. Also, I am not asking them to post how to mod the ECU to make it work like some else did. People like me do not want to overpay for a product that exist already for my application.
    So what pre-existing product are you referring to? Do you mean the ecu or the harness? The 99 ecu's are more expensive due to rarity, so just developing a solution for them is not the way to go. There just aren't enough to go around and they cost too much. So yes the ecu's are there, but are not a viable option. But if you already have one I'm sure Brett or Jeff could work out a solution for you. As for the harnesses, Boomslang only offers harness extension for our cars that come with pre-wired plugs for piggy back controllers, and these harnesses are not that.

    Everyone needs to take a step back, take a deep breath, and then come to terms with the fact that this tuning solution has been thoroughly reviewed for the best/most cost effective solution, and that solution will be the one that is offered. The information to make these mods will not be openly published due to a number of reasons but in the end does it really matter? This will be a fully tunable solution for much less than the cost of an AEM, which is the only other tuning solution for these cars that will offer similar performance.
    Last edited by 95gto; 11-03-2010 at 11:17 AM.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to 95gto For This Useful Post:


  4. #73
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Posts
    503
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 84 Times in 75 Posts
    Is this going to be a hardware only solution? Or, will a fully featured definition file be provided? How will the definition be distributed? ECMlink distributes their program for free, and only charge for the hardware. This makes it much easier for people to get a look at what they are buying.

  5. #74
    Member verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    July 2005

    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    494
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 92 Times in 37 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by donniekak View Post
    Is this going to be a hardware only solution? Or, will a fully featured definition file be provided? How will the definition be distributed? ECMlink distributes their program for free, and only charge for the hardware. This makes it much easier for people to get a look at what they are buying.
    The ROM and XML files for ECUFlash are already out there

  6. #75
    -BOOSTTD- verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2007

    Location
    Elko, Nevada, United States
    Posts
    571
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
    Sounds awesome. Good work!

  7. #76
    Forum User Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Location
    Charles Town, WV
    Posts
    439
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
    To keep this half on track for the flashing stuff, I'll spell this out as best as I can. Let's pretend your 3000GT is an "A" and a montero is a "M":

    Boomslang = Pass-through harness. Pin 1 goes to pin 1, pin 2 to pin 2, etc. It DOES NOT do anything except give you somewhere to splice wires into an intermediate harness, that is side "A1" to side "A2".

    Adapter Harness = CONVERTS/adapts the "A" connectors to the "M" connectors so that you can plug it into the new ECU and go, without sitting on the driver's side floor, decoding pin-out diagrams, with some hacked up junkyard connectors, soldering them into your main harness. You CANNOT just plug your 3S harness into the other ECU ... it doesn't work. You NEED the adapter harness, OR if you MUST go the cheap route; find some junkyard connectors. Cut off your main connectors. Figure out the pin-out, and solder everything in the car. Then find the flash enable port and hook that up. And the OBDII port if you don't have it. Do it once, and I guarantee, you'll gladly spend the money on the harness; unless you're a masochist.

    People have money spent on a variety of ECUs to find out which ones work, which ones don't, and the bits in-between. I contributed an ECU for research, too. These guys are doing hard work, spending their time and their money, and it should NOT be given away for free. Be happy that these flashable ECUs are even going to be offered; they could just keep them for themselves and let everyone keep running piggybacks or $2k AEM setups.

    Give them some time to get things properly prepared. It's not a shop; it's a few guys doing something for a platform they enjoy, outside of their day jobs. Look at the resources that ECM link has, and yet they STILL haven't even shown a prototype of anything, over a year later, and have nothing but "it's coming. sometime." answers.

    This is real. This is proven. This will happen. This would make a great Christmas present.
    1995 VR4 Coupe

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to jba3 For This Useful Post:


  9. #77
    Forum User Not Verified

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Location
    Cape Girardeau
    Posts
    4,791
    Thanks
    365
    Thanked 296 Times in 214 Posts
    I would not mind getting involved in testing and I have quite a bit of experience with the emanage blue, SAFC, and logging.

    Parting 6 speed
    Pampena 3.5 Stroker, GTX 2867 Gen IIs, AEM Series2, oohnoo SMIC, DN Hardpipes, FIC 1650s, Walbro 525, aermotive fpr, Dejon intake pipes, Tial Q, Koyo Rad, Samco Hoses, Stoptech 332mm fronts, HKS GT4 Coilovers, Spec 4+ LW, JDM 6 Speed, Billet shift forks, Pampena brace

  10. #78
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2007 (17 Years old ;)

    Location
    rio rancho (AKA Real Rathole)
    Posts
    103
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    glad this is here now. Get to read more info... After class at least.

  11. #79
    There will be Blood! verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    1997

    Location
    In Sane!
    Posts
    4,677
    Thanks
    1,081
    Thanked 449 Times in 331 Posts
    All I can say is thank you Sirs! I am sure you have solved which route I am taking for engine management.

    Help them, for they know not that which they do not know!
    CoopKill's Mistress Makeover Thread!
    "Punk, Nutswinging, Small Time, Asshat, Monkey, Jerkoff, Loser that rides on other peoples accomplishments!" . .

  12. #80
    | @/|/| +|2()|/| verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    December 2009

    Location
    Fox Cities, WI
    Posts
    1,128
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
    Hey guys can you answer quick. Im working on getting my EMU sold and have a buyer. But I need to know if I can run an open BOV with this setup??? And also can I run a MAP sensor or am I going to need a MAF? Im assuming I need a MAF. Because my setup right now does not have any intake, just an air filter directly on the turbo......Im going to need to be running 1000cc injectors as a side note.

    Would it be possible to alter the 99 code to allow for a MAP instead of a MAF? I should have stayed in software engineering . What was I thinking when I wasnt doing homework and studying....

    Thanks.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering