he does.
he does.
I think Ray said his cranks are good for 2k+ HP, the 75 re-used 800 max. not sure who added the naught![]()
Building a House, Car Mods on hold!
1996 GTO, Owner since 2003.
that crank is made from same material on top fuel drag cars. 4340 crank is good for 2000hp.
Plus that was THE old motor Matt Monett ran almost 1100AWHP on and set the world record with a mere archaic ARC-2 piggyback where he didn't even touch timing. It's kind of hard to see the lower power on this car isn't a result of the tune, VE of the motor, crappy cams, or backpressure somewhere in the system that led to the crank flexing. It just goes to show the right parts and a critical tune by someone that knows what they're doing to the T leads to the most power while doing it safely. It's really not hard to screw something up when making bigger power.
95 RT/TT Billet TD04s E70, DW1000cc injectors, ARC-2 with 92mm maf, 3SX fuel rail loop, hotwired Walbro 416/485, 3" FMIC, single small Krank vent, DR 3.5" downpipe and cat-back, DNP 02 housings, Hallman Pro MBC, BlackStealth LCDBC, AEM wideband, AEM oil pressure, Apexi S1 coilovers with SCE EVO 8/9 adapters, 3SX adjustable control arms, Spec 3+ clutch, Maximal solids/3SX poly motor mounts, Setrab custom SMOC, stock motor 127k miles, stock drivetrain.
It has been confirmed there was nothing wrong with the tune and the guy that tunes it REALLY knows his stuff. 8 years ago he built and tuned the world's first Ford Sierra Cosworth to break 200 mph in the standing 1.5 mile. In fact it ran 206 back then.
What happened was the ARP studs were put in as an 'upgrade' over stock and torqued to 90 ftlbs to bring the tolerances into line. The studs yielded even though they are supposed to take 90 ftlbs. Like I said I will never trust their products again. With stretched studs ANY crank would flex on ANY tune if it is not supported properly. I had the ARP studs tested at cosworth and the guy said their surface hardness was better but they were never going to handle 800 HP!! So I now have a custom set made that WILL take a lot more power.
As for the reason for the power being down last year, I made it quite public that there was a massive exhaust side restriction that we would be addressing this year which is exactly what we are doing. Better cams, screamer pipes (on Ray's recommendation), better exhaust system and solid internally shimmable lifters. The hydraulics were not refilling quickly enough with the cam profiles that were in there and 9000 RPM, hence the cauliflowered valve stem tips.
Where the car is at now is the gearbox is back today and we are putting the engine back together this week. Not far from getting it running now.
André
Awesome to hear PGI feel your's will be the true test
![]()
So close now. I was speaking to the guy who is building the transmission control unit and paddle shift last week about flying him down to set it up in about 10-12 days time hopefully.
André
You know speaking of lifter you probably lost oil pressure when you stretched the studs because crank got farther away from crank and that's why the lifter bled out. solid lifter will help you to get a bit more power but it'll be hard to set it up and I heard some do break which it sucks. any picture from the main studs. how much power are they rated at and how much are they charging you for? I might get those too if they are stranger than 625 head studs for supra.
3000gt.com 3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop |
Team 3S 3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information daveblack.net |
Michigan 3S MInnesota 3S Wisconsin 3S Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S |
North California 3000GT/Stealth United Society of 3S Owners 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums 3000GT/Stealth International |
3S National Gathering East Coast Gathering Upper Mid-West Gathering Blue Ridge Gathering |
Bookmarks