Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Quick spool valves.

  1. #1
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Owner Since
    2009

    Location
    Kelowna
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Quick spool valves.

    does anyone have experience with quick spool valves? such as this:

    Quick Spool Valve- The ultimate TQ producing part for your Turbocharged car

    do they work at all? any harm to performance (slightly increased backpressure when closed?)? do they actually help to spool a bigger turbo a little quicker?

    reason i ask, is not that i hope to spool a giant turbo like a 9b.

    my build plan is currently a 3.5l pampena shortblock, with billet crank etc, and a set of 6262's. I've done my research on that, and am content with the probable spool characteristics, but after coming accross these "quick spool valves" i'm wondering if i could go a bit bigger turbo (with the required divided turbine housing), and have it spool like the 6262, with more hp in the end.

    thoughts, suggestions, advice. let me know!

  2. #2
    One fix at a time verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    2,158
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked 57 Times in 49 Posts
    They do work. You can google it and see plenty of dyno graphs. It diverts the exhaust from both divided sides to just one which makes the turbo act like it has a smaller exhaust housing in turn increasing spool and low/mid range power. No matter which turbos you go with you will have to build your own kit or heavily modify a pre-made turbo kit. I had trouble getting my 5857 to fit on the rear without extensive modification to my DR T3 kit. Adding a QSV will make everything coming off the turbo not line up - wastegates, 02 housing, intercooler pipes, etc so it would all have to be modified. As long as your up for the work I say give it a shot. I'd consider something like that but I would also completely switch to a longer tube manifold setup.

  3. #3
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Owner Since
    2009

    Location
    Kelowna
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    i had already planned on probably an over the trans turbo setup, i was going to do my own headers/o2s/wastegates and intercooler piping anyway, so that's not a concern, i was just looking for some support of my plan, to make sure i'm not overlooking some obvious flaw to the plan.

    Thanks!

  4. #4
    Member Not Verified
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Owner Since
    2003

    Posts
    2,062
    Thanks
    112
    Thanked 272 Times in 206 Posts
    Shiver's quickspool valve doesn't require changing anything that bolts to the turbo, as it's all inside the housing....But changing turbine housings requires a new valve. Give and take.

  5. #5
    Banned J. Fast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    - O - SIX -

    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2,711
    Thanks
    405
    Thanked 200 Times in 140 Posts
    ^^^^Yup... Pretty bad ass mod if you're running divided!

  6. #6
    Member verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    05

    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    543
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked 45 Times in 37 Posts
    ooooo this might be in my future for my talon

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering