Okay, but is equating a financial boom in the tech sector equivalent to a boom in advancement of technology? Apple's huge growth has been attributed to the Ipod, the Iphone, and the Ipad.
Except that they're all the same tech, more or less...and apple doesn't even make it. All the big smartphone/tablet manufacturers have their products built for them (by foxxconn, etc.) with hardware built for them (qualcomm etc.), and in some cases, a.k.a. Apple, its the same damn thing on the inside, whether its an Ipod or an Ipad...so really instead of getting new tech, we're paying thrice for the same thing.
Does this really equate with pushing the boundaries of science and technology to the same extent as we did back in the 50s and 60s? There are some that would argue that on a per capita basis, our rate of innovation is slowing, such as Jonathon Huebner http://accelerating.org/articles/Inn...erTFSC2005.pdf
Is this movement in the market towards "repackagers" as opposed to groundbreakers not a signal of a push towards playing it safe, as opposed to taking risks on new ideas and discoveries?




Reply With Quote

dicks!


Bookmarks