Evo 560 Latency Values

[HLxDrummer]

Anyone have these that they have personally run in their car? I am finding values similar to our stock values, and values way off and not sure which one to trust/use.

[J. Fast]

Latency for Evo 9 560CC injectors is:

4.7V/3.312mSec 7.0V/1.680mSec 9.4V/1.032mSec 11.7V/0.672mSec 14.0V/0.432mSec 16.4V/0.264mSec 18.6V/0.144mSec

[aaronatstate]

That's what I use for them.

[HLxDrummer]

Thanks guys!

[HLxDrummer]

Just wanted to mention I found a few sources giving these numbers (including the guys on EvoM):

16V - 0.628
14V - 0.748
12V - 0.928
10V - 1.208
8V - 1.688
6V - 1.900

Maybe there is a difference between Evo8/9 injectors? I doubt it though..

I am going to try to run this and possibly compare to the values listed above.

[ilian51378]

Just wanted to mention I found a few sources giving these numbers (including the guys on EvoM):

16V - 0.628
14V - 0.748
12V - 0.928
10V - 1.208
8V - 1.688
6V - 1.900

Maybe there is a difference between Evo8/9 injectors? I doubt it though..

I am going to try to run this and possibly compare to the values listed above.

How come these values contain one value too few? The value for 18V seems to be missing... J.Fast posted seven values, while yours are six... I read that the values you supplied seem to work better, but what about the last value? What did you use for that?

By the way, Jester's website links to a table with the sizes and latencies of many cars, one of which is the Evo. These are the numbers listed there:


10V - 1.13

11V - 0.97

12V - 0.85

13V - 0.75

14V - 0.66

15V - 0.58

Again, only six values. They also seem to be at somewhat different voltages than the ones posted by you and J. Fast... The stock 3/S table has seven values, so what goes in the last one?

Lastly, is there any consensus on what values work best? I just installed a Chrome in my car and am about to do my first reflash... Thanks beforehand!

[sublime_whatigo]

I drove a few miles with stock latency values the other day (on evo injectors), it drove and made a pull just fine. Just check your trims after a bit.

[Unlogic]

I'm about to install a set of EVO 560 injectors in my car so I spent an hour tonight trying to figure out why there are two different sets of latency values available.

It seems like the answer is quite simple, there are two different versions of these injectors. The earlier MDL560 model (casting INP-020) and the later MDL560P model (INP-401).

The later MDL560P model has 4 spray nozzel and slightly lower latency values (see the values posted earlier in this thread by J.Fast) while the earlier model has a 2-spray nozzel and slightly higher latency values (see the values posted earlier in this thread by HLxDrummer).



HKS ECU Hardware

[Ray]

I'm about to install a set of EVO 560 injectors in my car so I spent an hour tonight trying to figure out why there are two different sets of latency values available.

It seems like the answer is quite simple, there are two different versions of these injectors. The earlier MDL560 model (casting INP-020) and the later MDL560P model (INP-401).

The later MDL560P model has 4 spray nozzel and slightly lower latency values (see the values posted earlier in this thread by J.Fast) while the earlier model has a 2-spray nozzel and slightly higher latency values (see the values posted earlier in this thread by HLxDrummer).



HKS ECU Hardware

You must have known that I needed this information right at this moment lol, great knowledge to have, thank you, Ray

[Ray]

Strange but it turns out, at least for me, having the MDL560P model (INP-401) injectors that the higher latency table worked extremely better than the supposedly correct lower latency table in my Chrome ECU ROM.
With J. Fast lower rpm bogged badly but with HLxDrummer it was way better with no bogging. Even the idle seemed improved. Go figure????????

Can anyone explain that contradiction?