Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 44

Thread: New Badass Game Engine

  1. #11
    Member verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    05

    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    543
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked 45 Times in 37 Posts
    skynet has become self aware

  2. #12
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Intropy View Post
    Man you're dense. FF:SI is a movie, rendered offline on a cluster of over a thousand machines. This is producing comparable results in a real-time game on a $300 box on your shelf.
    it looks pretty. it just doesn't impress me. 1-million polygon character rendering would impress me. what i see here is simply better texture mapping & 3d lighting. nothing demanding of a graphical powerhouse--hence the ps3. not at all dissimilar to re-designing the exterior of a car to make it "look sportier" while leaving the engine anemic.

  3. #13
    Forum User supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Posts
    53
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 189 Times in 99 Posts
    Personally, the graphics aren't as important to me as the theme of the video. Say hello to the Singularity, people. That stuff could very well be happening in the near future.

  4. #14
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by eljefefx View Post
    Personally, the graphics aren't as important to me as the theme of the video. Say hello to the Singularity, people. That stuff could very well be happening in the near future.
    and how many centuries removed are we from a viable positronic brain, jeff? it's one thing to program human-like responses to queries and environmental situations. it's quite another to achieve sentience. sci-fi has long fantasized about AI making a leap into sentience--should it progress far enough, yet we're still in the infant stages of programming adaptive, self-correcting behavior. quite possible? yes. near future? no way in heck.

  5. #15
    Forum User supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Posts
    53
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 189 Times in 99 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by IPD View Post
    and how many centuries removed are we from a viable positronic brain, jeff? it's one thing to program human-like responses to queries and environmental situations. it's quite another to achieve sentience. sci-fi has long fantasized about AI making a leap into sentience--should it progress far enough, yet we're still in the infant stages of programming adaptive, self-correcting behavior. quite possible? yes. near future? no way in heck.
    Well, personally I couldn't tell you how far off we are from a viable creation of Star Trek.

    The video in this thread shows advanced sentience, mainly to illicit an emotional response from the viewer. However to me the overall theme is important. A creation of man gains sentience, a human overseer of the production detects the sentience and feels that it is a flaw and calls for the disassembly of construct only to be confronted with the most basic, primal emotion for humans: fear.

    The overseer then allows the construct to live. To me this is the important part, as I said. Not how we got there but what we will do when we get there.

  6. #16
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by eljefefx View Post
    Well, personally I couldn't tell you how far off we are from a viable creation of Star Trek.

    The video in this thread shows advanced sentience, mainly to illicit an emotional response from the viewer. However to me the overall theme is important. A creation of man gains sentience, a human overseer of the production detects the sentience and feels that it is a flaw and calls for the disassembly of construct only to be confronted with the most basic, primal emotion for humans: fear.

    The overseer then allows the construct to live. To me this is the important part, as I said. Not how we got there but what we will do when we get there.
    ...as originally postulated in february of 1989 during the second second season of star trek...

  7. #17
    Member verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    05

    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    543
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked 45 Times in 37 Posts
    actually alot of people say were only acople decades from a singularity, some very fascinating reading to be done out their if one has the time.

  8. #18
    Forum User supporter
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Posts
    53
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 189 Times in 99 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nodoze View Post
    actually alot of people say were only acople decades from a singularity, some very fascinating reading to be done out their if one has the time.
    Agreed. Ray Kurzweil is a good place to start.

  9. #19
    Banned verified ictponder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2006

    Location
    Owosso, MI
    Posts
    286
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked 55 Times in 37 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by eljefefx View Post
    Agreed. Ray Kurzweil is a good place to start.
    I've always found his stuff really interesting, however, sometimes he makes some very precise predictions that make me wonder how he can be so sure.

  10. #20
    Member verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    05

    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    543
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked 45 Times in 37 Posts
    i have been looking into some of his work and possibly going to pick up a few of his books . this is a subject that has always fascinated me and besides a few lengthy internet articles i have not dug deeper into it. but i find it hard to read leisurely about theorys anymore. it took me 3 months to get through stephen hawkins - a brief history of space and time (which is not very brief haha) :S and i finished abraham lincoln - vampire hunter in under a week, lol

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering