I wasn't asking for you to produce proof, I was just curious as to your source of information that was all.
Ignoring the whole aspect of the item in question in favor of an isolated portion can only be done when both your gripe and suggested solution are also isolated to said portion rather than whole. So unless you are only advocating a change in union policy you can't neglect the overall function of the union just becuase it has one aspect you dissagree with.
I'm not advocating that you had an objection with good teachers. However, what you and many other people don't understand is the political climate created in today's schools by parents with the mentality outlined in the comic I posted. Responsibility for failure on the part of the student is being placed squarely on the teacher. That combined with administration that is more worried about appeasing parents rather than upholding consistent standards and you get a recipe that brings any teacher that parents dissagree with under fire.
So how do you reconcile the issue of the "marginal" teachers that don't make any waves falling under the radar in today's schools but the good teachers get parent complaints for expecting students to do homework, study for tests, and follow classroom instructions and rules? How do you exclude the problems created bad parents from this equation?
Here is the real issue that needs addressed and fixed. The problem is that the simple fix isn't a good one. As for pre-tenure review I would imagine that the specifics are school district and even state dependent, however the basic constants are comparatively heavy in class supervision of the teacher by the administration as well as lesson plan review.
The real question in my mind is how do fairly determine who are the good teachers and who are not?





Reply With Quote


Bookmarks