So who wants their ECU's "Chromed"?

[Toni]

With Toni's car there was a little bit of a difference over the MAFT/SAFC combo in terms of peak power. BUT there was a huge difference in midrange! Almost 40hp!

Yup, and it feels awesome on the street! Once I get the data from the dyno I'll post up a thread with my results, thoughts, etc. It'l be nice to show a side by side especially using the same dyno and all the crap I log lol.

[Toni]

So after a couple days of testing I feel comfortable releasing my Evoscan to Logworks log file converter.

evoscan2logworks - Convert Evoscan logs to Logworks logs - Google Project Hosting

Check it out and see what you think. It is beta so it's currently not tolerate of many things but a standard 2.6 evoscan logfile will work fine and the output will work in Logworks. I'm obviously not a vb(yuck) developer but it was quick, works, and needs nothing extra to be installed (I think).

Let me know if you have any troubles!

[green-lantern]

So after a couple days of testing I feel comfortable releasing my Evoscan to Logworks log file converter.

evoscan2logworks - Convert Evoscan logs to Logworks logs - Google Project Hosting

Check it out and see what you think. It is beta so it's currently not tolerate of many things but a standard 2.6 evoscan logfile will work fine and the output will work in Logworks. I'm obviously not a vb(yuck) developer but it was quick, works, and needs nothing extra to be installed (I think).

Let me know if you have any troubles!

Is this what you were showing me at NG?

[Monster Stealth]

error.png

So after a couple days of testing I feel comfortable releasing my Evoscan to Logworks log file converter.

evoscan2logworks - Convert Evoscan logs to Logworks logs - Google Project Hosting

Check it out and see what you think. It is beta so it's currently not tolerate of many things but a standard 2.6 evoscan logfile will work fine and the output will work in Logworks. I'm obviously not a vb(yuck) developer but it was quick, works, and needs nothing extra to be installed (I think).

Let me know if you have any troubles!

I get this error when trying to run it.

[Toni]

Doh! I assume you are using vista or 7? The file selection dialog is apparently deprecated for security reasons

[Toni]

Uploaded a new version for windows vista/7 etc. It's a little wonky because it opens up the file selection in the background so you have to switch to it by alt-tabbing or selecting it in the taskbar. I'll see if I can fix that later. I'm glad I don't develop stuff for windows

[hated]

Yes, thank you I understand how it works. I don't understand why I have to explain that I do know what the hell I'm talking about so many times.

I have a 91-92 car, that's the point. I have a 1g cam/crank setup, and I am using a 99 ECU, so I have to compensate for the latency differences in the maps, so I do not run to much timing. i.e. I want to run 20 degrees of timing at 7000rpm, I need to call for 16 degrees, that way after the latency differences, I actually do get 20. See I do know how it works, thanks.

aaronatstate:

I also have a 1G, and want to run this. So to compensate for the latency diff, run minus 4 across the board? What was your work around for no MAP sensor, just a simple boost guage correct? sorry, still on page 90.

[sublime_whatigo]

^ Post 941 seems to have the right info.
Also Aaron posted the formula earlier. RPM x 0.0005 = , then subtract that number from the timing maps.

Not just 4 across the board fyi.

[Greg E]

[blackvr]

Guys, great work on the flashable ecu conversion. I have a '92 3000GT here in Australia that needs this conversion ! Any chance of rehosting the files ? i'm not sure they are working ? Cheers Mike