this is nuts and not a joke...
The spherical genius of the Hüttlin Kugelmotor
even deflects energy on the downstroke to build electricity...
Less moving parts but that titanium is going to cost but its needed.
20 years of work for some guy...
this is nuts and not a joke...
The spherical genius of the Hüttlin Kugelmotor
even deflects energy on the downstroke to build electricity...
Less moving parts but that titanium is going to cost but its needed.
20 years of work for some guy...
that is awsome , wish i could get a few of my prototypes to that stage i dont think mine would be as efficient as his looks like it MIGHT
Too much friction involved. And I can't see those balls lasting very long. Great idea but will it last as long as a traditional piston engine? Mind you with 180 less parts it's probably much cheaper to make.
Last edited by GTOJOE; 10-18-2011 at 07:32 AM.
1990 JDM GTO TT with Vi-PEC plug-in V44 EMS, TD04-13T's, 3SX Downpipe, MP Hi-flow cat, ARC SMIC's, Aeromotive Stealth 340LPH pump, Fuelab 515 FPR, Ninja Performance 75amp hotwire kit, oohnoo fuel loop & rail adapters, Nylon braided ethanol fuel line, NGK AFX Wideband, K&N FIPK, Iridium plugs, HKS Twin Power DLI, Turbo XS racing BOV, 3SX poly mounts, Custom 280km/h speedo.
Waiting install
Injector Dynamics 725cc Injectors.
Build Thread
i'm still waiting for quasiturbine engines to debut on production cars. i won't hold my breath on this.
anything with a circular action instead of a reciprocating action will provide better efficiency, imho.
Yes and no. Traditional piston engines have simple to cast/machine parts. This Kugelmotor, while awesome, appears wildly complex to manufacture and service/repair. Unless I'm missing something, I don't understand how they'll machine/grind some of these surfaces without custom machinery...?
'93 VR4 | 10.57 @ 135 on C16 | 11.29 @ 125 on 93 | ~3275 lbs
Which parts are you referring to? The pistons have a curved shape, I don't see why they can't be cast just like a regular piston. I think the piston rings might be an issue, from the design, it looks like a lot more outward force would be generated on the outside of the piston (outer circle) than the inner circle.
Also interesting that for 4 pistons, it uses two sparkplugs. I wonder what kind of compression that engine is operating under.
What I like the most though, is how easy you could design a car around it. You could mount the engine in almost any possible configuration, especially if its the "no drive shaft, electrical only" version.
Looking at the labeled section view you can see for about half a second in the video, it's either the "Curve-Element" or the combustion chamber. From what I recall (can't watch this video again), it was a ring or semi-spherical part with curved, high precision internal features. I'm not a machinist, but those aren't features I'd try to design into parts.
|
3000gt.com 3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop |
|
Team 3S 3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information daveblack.net |
|
Michigan 3S MInnesota 3S Wisconsin 3S Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S |
North California 3000GT/Stealth United Society of 3S Owners 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums 3000GT/Stealth International |
|
3S National Gathering East Coast Gathering Upper Mid-West Gathering Blue Ridge Gathering |
Bookmarks