I believe the copper cores were 96 models and older, and the 3rd gens had aluminum. I could see having a thicker radiator would make the fans fight harder to move air through. While more coolant is cooling down at one time with a thicker radiator, its not cooling down as fast as the wind speeds aren't as strong going through. Furthermore, the air cooling down the back of the radiator is probably much warmer, so the coolant traveling through the back half of the radiator isn't cooling down as much as the radiator traveling through the front half of the radiator. I am not a thermal engineer, so I couldn't say this is true for sure. Maybe someone like Alex can give us his 2 cents.
Also, it makes me wonder if it really is unnecessary to have a 2" radiator core. The inlet and outlet of the radiator are the same size as stock, and can only flow so much through it at one time. If the 2" core can flow more coolant than the inlet and outlet can, then it seems to me that the effeciency is a lot less, plus the addition of more resistance of air trying to come through the radiator. On top of that, the core now also sits 1" closer to the hot turbos. Maybe BigTyla can give his evaluation on this theory.


Reply With Quote






Bookmarks