Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: compression ratio questions

  1. #21
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    so your consensus is that lower than 8:1 is diminishing returns with pump gas & air-cooled intercooler?

  2. #22
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Posts
    622
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
    If you could push enough boost to warrant 7:1 or 6:1 CR pistons it would be a lag monster on pump and nearly undrivable off boost I would think?.

    I like my M20 mixes, 20% Methanol in the tank allowing me to run more ignition advance than straight petrol.
    GTO-TT, PTE 1200's, M20, Emanage Ultimate, OS Geiken R3C,
    TD04-16g`s, Maf-t. 13g`s 12.4@115mph / 16g`s 12.5@117mph.

  3. #23
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    that's why i asked. i'd like to get the full story. it's an obvious continuum, and what happens on both extremes is of interest to me. somewhere around the middle has to be a range of acceptable performance. my gut instinct is that 7.5:1 is probaby as easy of an adjustment from 8:1 as 8.5:1 is. but i'd really like to hear details.

    p.s.
    thanks again for the article. now i have something definitive to shove in the face of people who swear up and down that ethanol is shit.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by familyMAN View Post
    Ray, what if you remove pump gas from the equation and only use race gas or ethanol? Other platforms (porsche, supra, dsms) seem to have good results with higher comp (9 to 11:1) with turbos and significant boost. What are your thoughts if you are removing octane limitation?
    it all works out to be the same on gasoline. power before spark knock is reduced even on race gas. think of things in extremes when comparing boost level and compression ie. 10:1 and 9psi vs 8:1 and say 15psi... which makes more power on the same gas before knock 13:1 and no boost? or, 7:1 and 25psi?

    e85 seems to run better with higher compression and boost because of its resistance to knock

  5. #25
    I don't bite
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Southern IN
    Posts
    1,996
    Thanks
    59
    Thanked 98 Times in 80 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray Pampena View Post
    it all works out to be the same on gasoline. power before spark knock is reduced even on race gas. think of things in extremes when comparing boost level and compression ie. 10:1 and 9psi vs 8:1 and say 15psi... which makes more power on the same gas before knock 13:1 and no boost? or, 7:1 and 25psi?

    e85 seems to run better with higher compression and boost because of its resistance to knock
    Thanks for the reply Ray. I am in the parts gathering phase and was thinking of 9:1 Mahle pistons for an E85 only, 16G build. Not really wild CR like some of the DSM and Supra ethanol builds.
    1992 Kilder Green VR4 - First 4G swap in a 3S. 2.0, auto, awd. 9.65 at 143mph. Now LS swapped. 8.52 at 162.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering