If you're talking about football strength, then yes I agree entirely. We might have a marginal lead top to bottom, but both conferences are notably inferior to the SEC and Big12, and somewhat inferior to the B1G. This is however, entirely immaterial.
In terms of stability and revenue, the ACC is 100x better off than the Big East. We have the biggest buyout (maybe 2nd), we have 14 teams, with several others begging to join, and even if everything went to shit, we could afford to lose all our prospects and two of our current teams and still maintain a 12-team league with a televised championship game. We have a much better TV deal than the Big East, and that will surely improve in the future (especially when tied in with bball). We're much stronger in non-revenue sports, much stronger academically, with Cuse and Pitt (probably UConn) we'll regain the Basketball crown, and we enjoy much greater parity and tradition than the Big East. The last ten years has seen some mediocrity, but football is cyclical, surely Clemson, FSU, Miami, Syracuse and GT won't remain "meh" 8-4 teams forever. FSU and Clemson are already showing strong signs of resurgence (look at their recruiting over the last two years, it rivals the top SEC teams).
Think about this: when was the last time that Notre Dame has won a BCS bowl? When was the last time they were in the national title hunt? Sh-t, when was their last really good season (2011 wasn't bad, but wasn't old school ND)? All totally irrelevant, they're still the single most sought after team in the land. Tradition + TV deals + fan base = money >>> real-time football strength. Boise State has undoubtedly been a better team the last five years, but what conference would take Boise State over ND? For the same reasons, even if the Big East was much stronger than the ACC in football today, there is no question as to which one is the superior choice for a team expecting to stay there for 100 years.
I'm sure WVU's board agrees, while the Big 12 seems extremely unstable as well, it is undoubtedly in better shape than the Big East. It is hard to fault WVU for jumping ship. Even though USF, Cinci and Louisville are also great teams and will be utterly f-cked when WVU does. I'm sure they'll be as mad at WVU as WVU was at VT/Miami/BC, but WVU would have been stupid to go down with a sinking ship.
__________________
Do not take my criticism of the Big East to imply that I hate it. I do like the ACC better (not a fan of bball only schools mixed in), but the Big East was a great league (and certainly underrated during the late 1990s). Just like MWC, they had a damn good shot at becoming a seriously powerful conference, but things just didn't work out, and now they're taking on water while their big boys are jumping ship. It's sad for both conferences, but it'd be foolish for TCU and WVU not to save themselves.



Reply With Quote


Yes, we did fight to keep the league together. Unfortunately our commissioner is brain dead and failed to keep a balance between basketball and football. No one gave a shit until we flipped 'em the bird and said we're out. Now, all of the sudden, they add teams(most of which do little for the league, especially when you factor what is departing. TCU isn't stupid, they saw the writing on the wall).













Bookmarks