Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: No intake pipes... drawbacks?

  1. #1
    Better than that "other" place Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Location
    Cazenovia, NY
    Posts
    525
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 32 Times in 14 Posts

    No intake pipes... drawbacks?

    I know people do it. Tug does it, DCIV has reported doing it. But what negatives are there from slapping small turbos directly on the compressor inlet of each turbo and running it that way?

    Matt Monet reported losing about 40HP by doing it on the dyno, but his car was pushing 1030HP at the time, so that's just not something I would want to compare the drawbacks to.

    My main dilemma is this. Space, for one. I just converted to blow through. I really don't see the sense in spending $300 on some polished no MAS intake pipes. The other problem is that my BOV is now sitting directly above where the stock MAS would sit, so even a large filter, like the one Forest posted in his thread, wouldn't work. The BOV wouldn't clear it.

    So, unless there are some serious side effects, I think I might just do it. I'll need to figure out what to do with the breather hose on the rear valve cover of course.

    Vacuum reduction, Powdercoated misc, cruise relocate, Evo9 BOV, Custom catch cans, Russell fuel filter, SS braided fuel lines, High flow fuel loop, Autogage fuel gauge, Catless DP, DNP Y-pipe, Fuel pump hotwire.

  2. #2
    Member Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    '09

    Location
    Myrtle Beach
    Posts
    2,604
    Thanks
    120
    Thanked 131 Times in 95 Posts
    I would put some kind of filter on each turbo at the very least. Maybe some wire mesh?

  3. #3
    Advanced Tech? verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2006

    Posts
    938
    Thanks
    159
    Thanked 139 Times in 87 Posts
    also keep in mind that matt M ran his turbos just completely bare. most small k&n filters have a venturi cone which should help smooth the airflow.
    Maddog Performance Engineering

  4. #4
    Forum User verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Posts
    449
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 26 Times in 17 Posts
    Ive seen Hennessey put the filters right on the turbo for there SRT8 turbo jeeps so i guess it should work ok on a 3S. as far as the breather hose that used to go to the pre turbo intake pipe, just trim it back really close to the valve cover and put on one of these
    K&N Crankcase Vent Filters
    the basic go fast bits...
    forged short block, Billet DR1000's, 680cc injectors, meth inj, FMIC, MAFT, Apexi Neo, hotwired 255lph fuel pump.

    Tuned by Ray Pampena

    Just a fun Daily Driver.

  5. #5
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    i'm of the opinion that intake tubes help airflow into the turbos to be smoother.

  6. #6
    I AM IMPORT POWER
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Driving Vicki Crazy
    Posts
    1,105
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 270 Times in 125 Posts
    Turbos need straight air. Turbulence kill power. They will work more efficiently if they have an inlet tube versus no tube or just a filter or a screen.

    -Chris

  7. #7
    Better than that "other" place Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Location
    Cazenovia, NY
    Posts
    525
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 32 Times in 14 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thor'svr4 View Post
    Ive seen Hennessey put the filters right on the turbo for there SRT8 turbo jeeps so i guess it should work ok on a 3S. as far as the breather hose that used to go to the pre turbo intake pipe, just trim it back really close to the valve cover and put on one of these
    K&N Crankcase Vent Filters
    I've seen some DSM guys do it too. My only issue with the breather filter is that I want vacuum in the crank case. The filter wont allow a vacuum to build up during boost.

  8. #8
    Forum User verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Location
    AB Canada
    Posts
    157
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Subscribed for info
    1991 GTO TT restoration in progress
    watch the progress from the start:
    http://www.3sgto.org/f2/my-complete-...ions-4545.html

  9. #9
    BAD ASS - I've got one Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2/2010

    Location
    L'Anse, MI
    Posts
    2,476
    Thanks
    1,262
    Thanked 594 Times in 488 Posts
    WWND?
    Ranked No. #1 in initial quality

    Idiots, simply by being idiots, seem capable of achieving randomly bad things that are beyond the imaginings of sensible people.

  10. #10
    Ever see what dirt and water partical do to intake bldes when they are spinning at 100,000 RPM. The blades look sandblasted and not to mension what a june bug would do.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering