This is a tough question to answer. The APR wing had cfd data available but the new airfoil did not. My concerns with the data are that the CFD analysis appears to performed with the wing in free space and the data tables are limited. Since the wing is mounted lower than the rear roofline I don't think it will get the full performance of being in "clean air" but part of the beauty of a 3d airfoil on a car like ours is that it doesn't have to be up really high to work. And since our AA system didn't seem to meet their published numbers directly I had to do some interpolation. And once again the AOA measurements weren't made with the best device available so there is probably some variation in those values.
So disclaimer aside here are some basic comparisons based on the Angle of Attack measurements and the CFD data that APR provided:
Down - AOA = 0*
80mph = 79.6 lbs
100mph = 126.3 lbs
120mph = 184.0 lbs
Up - AOA = 14*
80mph = 107.6 lbs
100mph = 170.0 lbs
120mph = 240.7 lbs
Now once again this was for the old wing and it won't fully account for the mounting location, so in practice the actual values would be lower. To me the big question is how much lower will they be.





Reply With Quote

.











Bookmarks