Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Eclipse GSX or Celica GT Four

  1. #1
    Forum User Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2000

    Posts
    1,244
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    215
    Thanked 91 Times in 64 Posts

    Eclipse GSX or Celica GT Four








    These are just google pictures so dont think I took them...

    I have driven both cars and I cant decide wich one would you pick and why ?

  2. #2
    DR-750 club Not Verified Feedback Score 1 (100%) FeaRpb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    I could drive.

    Location
    Portland, Texas
    Posts
    2,668
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 180 Times in 127 Posts
    DSM all the way.

    AWD, Turbo, 4g63 is unbreakable... almost.
    Last edited by FeaRpb; 12-03-2010 at 06:22 PM.
    July 2014 COTM
    We follow the earth. The earth follows the stars. The stars know their way and though the body dies. The stars will remain, like the waves of the sea and restless slate.

  3. #3
    -BOOSTTD- verified Feedback Score 2 (100%) mh3kgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2007

    Location
    Elko, Nevada, United States
    Posts
    578
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
    I second that DSM vote...probably gonna try to pick one up myself if my vr4 ever sells

  4. #4
    Forum User Feedback Score 1 (100%) 3KVT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2003

    Posts
    133
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    I'm sorry, but for me this is a no brainer. GSX FTW!!!!

    The only Toyota I'd buy would be a Celica-Supra, or a Supra. My friend had an old MR-2 (pre-new-nancy-boy lookin body style) and it was awesome, but it was less reliable than my car. A friend had an old Celica like this one (not a GT4) and it never quite ran right, despite multiple tunings and shop-trips.

    Plus, from what I've seen, as far as part availability/cost, the Eclipse wins hands down.

  5. #5
    Forum User verified Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I don't know much about the Celica but I think there pretty rare compared to the GSX. If you could find a clean low mileage GT Four I would go for that IMO. GSX would be sick regardless.

  6. #6
    Forum User verified Feedback Score 2 (100%) J-Groove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    November 1999

    Location
    Rowlett
    Posts
    1,309
    Thanks
    458
    Thanked 98 Times in 66 Posts
    If I could get that generation GT-4 here, I would say GT-4.

    Just something neat about them. Mainly because they are rare as heck here in the states.

    -John

  7. #7
    Not A DSM verified Feedback Score 3 (100%) Polygon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    June 2006

    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    396
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    DSMs are common, I'd take the Celica. However, you're going to have trouble finding one.

  8. #8
    Forum User Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2000

    Posts
    1,244
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    215
    Thanked 91 Times in 64 Posts
    trouple finding one not here ...

    those that dont know anything about celica here is quote from wiki,,,
    The GT-Four ST205 was launched for the Japanese market in February 1994, and for the Australian, European, and British markets in the mid-year. This version was to be the most powerful Celica produced to date, producing between 242 PS (178 kW; 239 bhp) for the export model and 255 PS (188 kW; 252 bhp) for the Japanese market model from an updated 3S-GTE engine matched to the E154 gearbox. Influenced strongly by Toyota Team Europe, Toyota's factory team in the World Rally Championship, the final version of the GT-Four included improvements such as an all aluminum hood to save weight, four-channel ABS (optional for the Japanese market), an improved CT20B twin entry/turbocharger, and "Super Strut Suspension".
    The 2500 homologation cars built to allow Toyota to enter the GT-Four as a Group A car in the World Rally Championship also sported extras such as all of the plumbing required to activate an anti-lag system, a water spray bar and pump for the front intercooler, a basic water injection system, a small hood-mounted spoiler aft of the windscreen washers (also standard fit on all UK cars) and an extender spoiler mounted on risers. The actual rally cars were fitted with standard MacPherson struts (that cost about GB£25,000 each because Super Strut Suspension was technically problematic).[citation needed] Out of the 2500 GT-Four WRC built, 2100 stayed in Japan, 300 were exported to Europe, 77 for Australia, and a few to the general markets. The Japanese market ST205 came with a standard automatic climate control air conditioner, but ABS was optional. Export WRC models only received a manual air conditioner system but all came with standard ABS.
    Official WRC models in the initial 2500 were only produced in 1994 as required by the WRC homologation rules. All ST205 sold in Australia were WRC models and called the GT-Four Group A Rallye.
    In 1995 (for the 1996 US model year), the ST205 received minor changes which consisted of new 6-spoke alloys, projector headlights, contoured side spoilers, and a redesigned rear spoiler. The high WRC rear spoiler was not standard for the facelift model (only available as an option), but returned on the second minor change in December 1997.

  9. #9
    Member verified Feedback Score 0 DocWalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Oct '08 - Oct '10

    Location
    Royersford, PA
    Posts
    3,837
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,070
    Thanked 442 Times in 317 Posts
    If you were in the US, I'd say DSM all the way because of the relative availability of parts (even if you're comparing against the older generations of GT4, the ST205 wasn't sold here). Considering where you live, parts will be expensive no matter what for either car.
    R135
    ╚╬╬╝
    - 24

  10. #10
    Not A DSM verified Feedback Score 3 (100%) Polygon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    June 2006

    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    396
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mb7050 View Post
    trouple finding one not here ...
    Really?

    You're pretty lucky then. I know of one here in Utah. I've looked for some for sale and I can never find them. Even if I do a nation wide search.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering