Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Wiring harness question TT ATX

  1. #1
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Owner Since
    2015

    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Wiring harness question TT ATX

    I'm starting my TT Conversion on my 96 3k SL in about a week or so. Only thing I have a question with now is the wiring harness. I've heard so many different things and I'm so lost on what to do. Because electrical is not my forté.

    Okay so, should I get a 2nd gen VR4 ECU, and a 2nd gen VR4 engine wiring harness? If so can you point me in the direction of where to get one. There are none local to me.
    Also if I do get the ECU and Harness there should be no splicing involved correct? And no tune is needed?

    This may also play a big role in all of this. My car, as an SL, is Cali Spec. So should the ECU I get be also Cali Spec? Or can I buy a fed spec harness and fed ECU?

  2. #2
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    If the info is lost, it's because much of Shooter83's work has been lost with the loss of the old florida3s site, and from 3sdie becoming a turd factory that really needed to DIAF 6 years ago.

    /rant

    If you use ANY TT wiring harness, you'll have to manually make it talk to the TCU. If you use an NA harness (at least one off an ATX), that will work fine, but you'll be fairly limited on how much boost you can run with a piggyback ECU off the NA ECU. Now IIRC, if you get a FED harness, you can run FED ECU just fine. There's also JDM spec ECUs--just to make your life a living hell (I know this, because I have one & it only has 1 o2 read, instead of the 2 on FED or the 4 on Cali). Again, you can ask Shooter83 about this--because he did the swap for me. BAADVR4 might be able to chime in as well. My car has turned into an electrical leviathan.

    Anyways, I'd figure out if you want to run piggyback, AEM or flashable/chrome. IIRC 96 is OBD2, so you should be able to run flashable ECU on it. Either way, this determination will steer you in the direction you need to go. AEM/Chrome = you can keep your existing harness; just use the right impedence (NA impedence) injectors & don't even worry about resistors/resistor pack. Your alternative (w/ piggyback) is as above, and really depends on how you want to play it. And that depends on your desired power levels, and how much work you want to put into it. If you want fire & forget, sell it and buy a VR4 & live with the asspain of rowing gears. No matter what you choose, expect some rain. Chrome still has quirks & I see troubleshooting threads pop up here all the time; sure, better than it was at first, but certainly not problem free, and DEFINITELY not novice friendly. AEM is even worse. Stock boost will work with stock tt injectors & MBC w/ tt harness & ECU...but you're back to jury-rigging it to the TCU yourself.

    Sorry, but there's no "easy way". Just some ways that are slightly less difficult.
    Last edited by IPD; 04-15-2016 at 08:13 PM.

  3. #3
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Owner Since
    2015

    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by IPD View Post
    If the info is lost, it's because much of Shooter83's work has been lost with the loss of the old florida3s site, and from 3sdie becoming a turd factory that really needed to DIAF 6 years ago.

    /rant

    If you use ANY TT wiring harness, you'll have to manually make it talk to the TCU. If you use an NA harness (at least one off an ATX), that will work fine, but you'll be fairly limited on how much boost you can run with a piggyback ECU off the NA ECU. Now IIRC, if you get a FED harness, you can run FED ECU just fine. There's also JDM spec ECUs--just to make your life a living hell (I know this, because I have one & it only has 1 o2 read, instead of the 2 on FED or the 4 on Cali). Again, you can ask Shooter83 about this--because he did the swap for me. BAADVR4 might be able to chime in as well. My car has turned into an electrical leviathan.

    Anyways, I'd figure out if you want to run piggyback, AEM or flashable/chrome. IIRC 96 is OBD2, so you should be able to run flashable ECU on it. Either way, this determination will steer you in the direction you need to go. AEM/Chrome = you can keep your existing harness; just use the right impedence (NA impedence) injectors & don't even worry about resistors/resistor pack. Your alternative (w/ piggyback) is as above, and really depends on how you want to play it. And that depends on your desired power levels, and how much work you want to put into it. If you want fire & forget, sell it and buy a VR4 & live with the asspain of rowing gears. No matter what you choose, expect some rain. Chrome still has quirks & I see troubleshooting threads pop up here all the time; sure, better than it was at first, but certainly not problem free, and DEFINITELY not novice friendly. AEM is even worse. Stock boost will work with stock tt injectors & MBC w/ tt harness & ECU...but you're back to jury-rigging it to the TCU yourself.

    Sorry, but there's no "easy way". Just some ways that are slightly less difficult.
    Okay, so I have a few options that are appealing to me. I just want to confirm what I choose. I am not looking to run super amounts of boost.
    -So your saying I can get tt wiring harness and tt ecu from a 2g vr4 be okay?
    -Also, if I decided to go AEM/Chrome and ran NA impedance I would not have to wire in any resistors?
    -And I can use a NA harness and ECU with piggyback, and wire in my resistors? But since I already have 4 o2 sensors already I would not have to modify my existing harness to add any extra o2 sensors. Right?

    Sorry it's super late and I'm tired. Let me know if I'm not clear enough.

  4. #4
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    http://www.3sx.com/store/comersus_vi...dProduct=24271

    These resistors are only so you can use the stock tt injectors in a car with an n/a harness. Point being, screw using the stock tt injectors--and just get injectors that match the N/A specs, and you won't have to worry about the damn resistors. Only problem with this is--you'll have to scout your own injectors, since all of the solutions for TT's are going to be for the wrong impedence.

    As far as your solution on which route to go--that's still up to you--it's the TCU connectivity that is the x-factor. If you want the car to function normally as an automatic would--then you still have to make sure it "talks" to the ECU. Otherwise, if you're willing to manually shift the auto, you'll need a controller box & flip switches each time you want to change gears; which is a bit tedious for anything other than racing, imho. But iirc, there's at least one dude who jury-rigged it with makeshift paddles so it mimics more modern cars with sequential shifting. I can't speak to overal transmission durability with those mods though.

    The sad truth is, since Mitsubishi never made automatic VR4's (and only sold JDM AWD ATX's), in the USA you're practically trailblazing every time you decide to keep the ATX and go with a TT. Even when 3SX set the ATX 1/4 mile record, it was done via manually shifting. Keeping an ATX in a 3/s is seen as a pariah & the work of lunacy. In years past it was even worse--because there was a lot of bad (and totally baseless) stigma about the ATX being made of glass, etc. Meanwhile, the DSM community has the same transmission (internals) running 8's on the 1/4, and swears by it. So yes, it's really no wonder that the 3/s community has been so badly represented in aftermarket--since we f'd ourselves over with parochialism & idiocy. But I already made a blog post about it on here.

  5. #5
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Owner Since
    2015

    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by IPD View Post
    http://www.3sx.com/store/comersus_vi...dProduct=24271

    These resistors are only so you can use the stock tt injectors in a car with an n/a harness. Point being, screw using the stock tt injectors--and just get injectors that match the N/A specs, and you won't have to worry about the damn resistors. Only problem with this is--you'll have to scout your own injectors, since all of the solutions for TT's are going to be for the wrong impedence.

    As far as your solution on which route to go--that's still up to you--it's the TCU connectivity that is the x-factor. If you want the car to function normally as an automatic would--then you still have to make sure it "talks" to the ECU. Otherwise, if you're willing to manually shift the auto, you'll need a controller box & flip switches each time you want to change gears; which is a bit tedious for anything other than racing, imho. But iirc, there's at least one dude who jury-rigged it with makeshift paddles so it mimics more modern cars with sequential shifting. I can't speak to overal transmission durability with those mods though.

    The sad truth is, since Mitsubishi never made automatic VR4's (and only sold JDM AWD ATX's), in the USA you're practically trailblazing every time you decide to keep the ATX and go with a TT. Even when 3SX set the ATX 1/4 mile record, it was done via manually shifting. Keeping an ATX in a 3/s is seen as a pariah & the work of lunacy. In years past it was even worse--because there was a lot of bad (and totally baseless) stigma about the ATX being made of glass, etc. Meanwhile, the DSM community has the same transmission (internals) running 8's on the 1/4, and swears by it. So yes, it's really no wonder that the 3/s community has been so badly represented in aftermarket--since we f'd ourselves over with parochialism & idiocy. But I already made a blog post about it on here.
    Okay I feel really stupid right now. I have noooo idea why I typed TT ATX. I have a 5 speed manual transmission. I'm sorry about all that confusion. That being said I can run a safc and be okay for the time being?

  6. #6
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    5 speed manual FWD IS glass. Expect it to grenade on you. Stealthee is NA and goes through them like a hot knife through butter. I'd just recommend getting stock vr4 harness & ecu & injectors, and just running that w/o any piggyback. That's the easiest way. You can always upgrade later.

  7. #7
    The one. The only. verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    August 28, 2002

    Location
    SWPA
    Posts
    4,042
    Thanks
    182
    Thanked 699 Times in 529 Posts
    Not only am I NA, but I am SOHC. I broke 5 transmissions. 4 of them were blown diffs, one was a blown 2nd gear. The blown 2nd was because I had a Quaiffe LSD in it that is almost unbreakable. If you are going to stick with the NA trans I highly recommend the Quaiffe though. It's expensive, but it has a lifetime guarantee, even if you race with it. I just recommend not trying to grab 2nd if you are overpowering 1st.

    [06-05, 19:29] OhioSpyderman: Brian, finding a woman is NOT the answer, you need to shop for a good VACUUM

  8. #8
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Owner Since
    2015

    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by stealthee View Post
    Not only am I NA, but I am SOHC. I broke 5 transmissions. 4 of them were blown diffs, one was a blown 2nd gear. The blown 2nd was because I had a Quaiffe LSD in it that is almost unbreakable. If you are going to stick with the NA trans I highly recommend the Quaiffe though. It's expensive, but it has a lifetime guarantee, even if you race with it. I just recommend not trying to grab 2nd if you are overpowering 1st.
    I've heard that from so many people already. That is definitely something I'm going to invest in. DEFINITELY. The transmission that's in it already grinds into second. So I'm going to find another transmission and install the Quaiffe then install it when the current transmission is toast.

  9. #9
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Owner Since
    2012

    Location
    California
    Posts
    59
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I think that having a 96 should let you almost plug & play, you just need to add the resistors (if going stock style low impedance) and ignore a few wires (VICS from the NA harness, Turbo meter-ABS signal-AE switch-FP relay 2-FP solenoid-boost control from the TT ecu), there is no cali/fed spec from 96+, number of ecu plugs should match, I have all the info for 91-95 tt/na/cali-fed ecus and wiring (since I had a few of those years) and 91-93 its almost a direct swap, 94-95 needs to be the same spec/year, and if you go from NA fed harness to a TT matching ECU you will be missing a plug (small one with the extra O2's).

  10. #10
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Owner Since
    2015

    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by reses View Post
    I think that having a 96 should let you almost plug & play, you just need to add the resistors (if going stock style low impedance) and ignore a few wires (VICS from the NA harness, Turbo meter-ABS signal-AE switch-FP relay 2-FP solenoid-boost control from the TT ecu), there is no cali/fed spec from 96+, number of ecu plugs should match, I have all the info for 91-95 tt/na/cali-fed ecus and wiring (since I had a few of those years) and 91-93 its almost a direct swap, 94-95 needs to be the same spec/year, and if you go from NA fed harness to a TT matching ECU you will be missing a plug (small one with the extra O2's).
    Sorry for the late response. So I can find a 96 TT Ecu, and basically cut a few wires a and it will work? I definitely wanna try this. That being said, if I do this is a SAFC still required? So I can run it on NA impedance. I can add the resistors no problem. But if what you're saying is correct then it will make my life so much easier.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering