Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Draw through setup??

  1. #11
    JNS Engineering verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    1994

    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,112
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked 155 Times in 110 Posts
    The physics of the cross sectional area cannot be disputed however it is also a fact that EVOs make a ton of power through those Mafs. My personal experience is a gain of around 30-50whp in moving from stock maf to a 399 evo maf depending on whether I run a 91 octane map or a 100 octane map. That said, I've had the 3.75 + MAF-T kit for some time now and ready to drop it in along with Oohnoo's large SMIC. Both stock and Evo mafs are significant restrictions above 450whp.

    Mod list (scroll down the page)
    JNS Engineering has your Spyders covered (and uncovered too!!)

  2. #12
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Owner Since
    2009

    Posts
    6
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    So just to let you know,
    Two days ago I switched from the stock to the EVO Maf. Just with the intake adjustments on Chrome I did not notice any difference. If any, the spool up is maybe a little slower now, but this is just my personal feeling, I have no log data for that. Other than that the car runs the same as with the stock MAF.
    Last edited by iGT; 05-15-2015 at 03:02 PM.

  3. #13
    JNS Engineering verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    1994

    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,112
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked 155 Times in 110 Posts
    Assuming you calibrated it correctly in Chrome you wouldn't notice a difference right away. The difference is seen only when the car is pushed to the knock limit. I was able to push 30-50 whp further with the Evo maf. You would have to increase your boost or timing to see the difference.

  4. #14
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Posts
    622
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
    I can see your point that the more accurate flow metering of the 8 maf can allow more accurate ignition maps (on the limit of knock).

    For me, running 2 bar of boost in blowthrough the restriction would outweigh any gain really.

    I love the idea of the Karman Hz Maf and if there was a way to make 2 work (1 per turbo inlet) I would deffinitely try it (looked long and hard at combining 2 signals but came to a dead end).

    Look at the 300zx and GTR, 2 mafs..
    GTO-TT, PTE 1200's, M20, Emanage Ultimate, OS Geiken R3C,
    TD04-16g`s, Maf-t. 13g`s 12.4@115mph / 16g`s 12.5@117mph.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering