Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 97

Thread: Rebirth of a street beast

  1. #31
    I lack color... verified

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Aug 1998

    Posts
    3,589
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked 498 Times in 241 Posts
    Think you'll be ready for NG?

    2014 Exomotive Exocet - #101 "shocker yellow" - 1.8L 5-speed 3.9 torsen FMII powered
    Read more: http://mevowners.proboards.com/threa.../greg-pa-build

    99 Solano Black VR4 - #16 of 287 - ground up restoration - sold
    98 Pearl White VR4 #54 of 231 - 12.84@105mph - 93 Octane 12.50@107mph - 100 Octane with Chromed ECU - sold
    99 Pearl White VR4 #108 of 287 - 3RD place stock car class ECG 11 - Sold
    98 Black VR4: 100% stock - totalled by an Illegal 2-12-08
    95 White Stealth TT - 11.852 @ 118.25 - sold
    95 SSG Stealth TT - 11.981 @ 115.81mph - sold

    "I don't actually work on cars, I just talk about them on the internet."

  2. #32
    Low & Slow verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2005

    Location
    Fortson, GA
    Posts
    577
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 39 Times in 29 Posts
    I will be. The car is a question mark still. It is a hopeful possibility though. Spoke with Ray today and he said the pistons will be done soon.

    Jeff

  3. #33
    One fix at a time verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    2,158
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked 57 Times in 49 Posts
    It's your exhaust side not supposed to be ported or knife edged? I thought Matt said that causes exhaust reversion. He just lightly gets rid of the casting flaws and polishes it up.

  4. #34
    // Off the beaten path \\ Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2006

    Posts
    307
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
    Subbed. Love your car.
    Stance Game Michael Myers
    19t RT/TT
    04 e60
    @Get_Like_M1ke

  5. #35
    Low & Slow verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2005

    Location
    Fortson, GA
    Posts
    577
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 39 Times in 29 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TurboSinceBirth View Post
    It's your exhaust side not supposed to be ported or knife edged? I thought Matt said that causes exhaust reversion. He just lightly gets rid of the casting flaws and polishes it up.
    The porting was done by IPS years ago along with the oversized valves. I simply knocked the carbon off exposing their work. That is the big difference from DR's head work and IPS's; the cnc machining marks are not removed from IPS.

    This doesn't seem to be a terrible thing though as they make good power. Turbo reversion is the only reversion I am concerned with and hopefully the recent changes will help in that department.

    Thanks boosted.

    More progress made today.

    The oil pan is clean finally.

    All the valves carbon buildup has been removed. The exhaust valves will require lapping. I'll get that done tomorrow along with head assembly.

    All valvetrain parts have been cleaned. I couldn't believe the amount of material that came from the rocker arms. It's been said before and I'll reinforce it again, that shit goes everywhere.

    Methanol testing is complete. I'll put up some pictures a little later as the methanol test results are pretty cool. For now I'll say there was a restriction in the 1/4" compression fittings on my setup. That problem will be fixed.

    Jeff

  6. #36
    Forum User verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    August 2010

    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,494
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 57 Times in 46 Posts
    Keep that progress coming Jeff!!

  7. #37
    Low & Slow verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2005

    Location
    Fortson, GA
    Posts
    577
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 39 Times in 29 Posts
    Still need lapped but, looking good.



    The methanol tests were done with 3/8" compression feeding the system instead of 1/4" compression. Bottom line on the tub was the system's old flow rate with 1/4" compression feeding it and a best of 1675ml/min. It typically averages 1625ml/min with this arrangement. The middle line was the lowest tested value with just a 3/8" compression feed added to the existing system at a flow rate of 1800ml/min. It averaged out to 1800ml/min over 3 tests with a best of 1850ml/min. The top line was with a 375ml/min nozzle added which bested 1975ml/min and averaged 1960ml/min.



    I think there were variations in the tests because the battery charger that was hooked up was moving the voltage around going from charge mode (~13.2VDC loaded) to maintain mode (~12.5VDC loaded) That's why I ran multiple tests with each setup because there were typically 50-75ml/min differences between tests. It could have also been my start and stop timing but averaging the results got me the answer I was looking for.

    I'm going to move the pump to the engine bay and effectively run the setup that produced the middle line on the bucket with 2 nozzles and a 3/8" feeder to the pump. This should give me the boost I was looking for when going >25psi with minimal cost. If it doesn't, I'll add the third nozzle and really bump the flow of the system. The good news is that I found the bottleneck of this sytem and proved a cost effective solution to overcoming it.

    Jeff

  8. #38
    There will be Blood! verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    1997

    Location
    In Sane!
    Posts
    4,677
    Thanks
    1,081
    Thanked 449 Times in 331 Posts
    So what size nozzles are you to be running again?

    Help them, for they know not that which they do not know!
    CoopKill's Mistress Makeover Thread!
    "Punk, Nutswinging, Small Time, Asshat, Monkey, Jerkoff, Loser that rides on other peoples accomplishments!" . .

  9. #39
    Low & Slow verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2005

    Location
    Fortson, GA
    Posts
    577
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 39 Times in 29 Posts
    2 Devil"s Own DO14's. They are rated at 882ml/min at 100psi. The third nozzle was a snow 375ml/min rated at 60psi. I mention the rating psi because it makes a difference when you run 100+psi. The snows will outperform their rating and the Devil's Own will be right on target or slightly above depending on line pressure.

    I don't recommend running much more than what I have bench tested with because they aren't seeing boost and the gains are diminishing. I figure the system is near it's limits to maintain good atomization (pump wise). That is the main reason I don't want to jump right into the 3 nozzle setup. If I feel I am still lacking in the methanol department once reassembled, I will add it and give feedback. For now, I'm gonna call it a cheap fix.

    Jeff

  10. #40
    There will be Blood! verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    1997

    Location
    In Sane!
    Posts
    4,677
    Thanks
    1,081
    Thanked 449 Times in 331 Posts
    Nice, I should be more than safe with what my snow 100cc/min x6 will flow then. Would you suggest going with the 3/8" feed with this setup as well?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering