Who do you think killed JFK

[HilbillyHomeboy]

Not sure if serious, but really? It's just not possible he was the lone gunman the CIA and the Warren report made him out to be.


The magic bullet theory alone tells us there was more than one shooter. The fact that a lot of the CIA were out drinking the night before. The poor organisation. The route.

Scooter

Why would I not be serious? You asked a question, and I answered it. See IPD's post.

Jeremy

[GTO Assassin]

Well, you can be a sarcastic mother fucker sometimes.

IPD's post made me chuckle. I mean the bullet's that were found hadn't even been fired for God's sake. And gel? Tumbling bullets? Seriously....... Common sense tells you a bullet is NOT going to do what the Warren commission told us they think it did. I wouldn't believe most of what was written in the autopsy report as it wasn't done correctly by the proper people. The car getting completely cleaned up, the 3 shots in 6 odd seconds, there is sooo much wrong about the following investigation of the murder of your former president. Lone killer really???

Scooter

[HilbillyHomeboy]

Said the kettle to the pot.

I wasn't going to elaborate, as everything I've read, and watched, combined with a good knowledge of firearms, leads me to the conclusion that what has been reported is correct. And, furthermore, has been repeated(as IPD stated).

You know where my information comes from. If you want to sway me, I expect something more substantial than your personally typed posts. Because you said so is not a supportable argument. The only substance you posted, the youtube video, only further cements that the shot came from the 6th floor. Of which, that has always been the stand. The conspiracy theorists assert the shot came from the front, and therefore couldn't have been Oswald. With that said, show me something, give me something to read, etc..

Jeremy

[j2k4]

Ever notice how some people always and only ask easy-to-answer questions they don't want answered?

"What difference at this point does it make?"

-Hillary Clinton

Anyway, I'll go ahead and ask the question, and wait for Scott's answer.

Or anyone else's, for that matter.

[stealthee]

It gives people something to debate about....

[Alan92RTTT]

3 shots in 6 seconds with a bolt action rifle given the speed and distance requires a very good shooter. Everything I have seen/read says Oswald was not a that good. Does that mean its impossible no, it just it brings in room for doubt.

I know that Connely was sitting down and left to Kennedy this makes the flight path of the "magic bullet" possible. But I find it hard to believe that it did all that damage, went through two people and a seat and was only flattened a bit on one side. Does that mean its impossible, no it just it brings in room for doubt.

[mb3000]

Ever notice how some people always and only ask easy-to-answer questions they don't want answered?



Anyway, I'll go ahead and ask the question, and wait for Scott's answer.

Or anyone else's, for that matter.

I'm with you on this one.

[GTO Assassin]

I wasn't going to elaborate, as everything I've read, and watched, combined with a good knowledge of firearms, leads me to the conclusion that what has been reported is correct. And, furthermore, has been repeated(as IPD stated).

You know where my information comes from. If you want to sway me, I expect something more substantial than your personally typed posts. Because you said so is not a supportable argument. The only substance you posted, the youtube video, only further cements that the shot came from the 6th floor. Of which, that has always been the stand. The conspiracy theorists assert the shot came from the front, and therefore couldn't have been Oswald. With that said, show me something, give me something to read, etc..

Please don't think I'm trying to get people on side. I'm not shouting out for everyone to think like me or believe what I believe. But I find the lone gunman theory laughable in every sense once you read about everything, from his background to how poorly the day was organised.

Here's another view of the murder
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law...-1226763596593

This guy believes JFK was shot by one of his own guards from the car behind. Now while I don't think end of story or believe it 100%, it's still an interesting point of view. Not sure if the video is still up, but he uses lasers and shows us where he believes the shooters were positioned and how they fired.

Ever notice how some people always and only ask easy-to-answer questions they don't want answered?

Anyway, I'll go ahead and ask the question, and wait for Scott's answer.

Or anyone else's, for that matter.

I'm not sure what you are asking. You posted some uninterested post at the top which told me you didn't give a shit, yet here you are. You either have an opinion, or you don't. Post up your opinion or don't. If you're asking me "at this point, what difference does it make" then the answer lies in my very first post. Maybe try reading it first insstead of being a smart arse just trying to be funny.

Scooter

[IPD]

fine, you unbelieving mutherfuckers.



I don't know where the hell scooter thinks that the "bullet recovered wasn't fired". here's the "magic bullet" from pics off the same wikipedia article alan posted:




as i said, smashed on the side. that doesn't happen unless a bullet is TUMBLING, because otherwise--the nose of the bullet would be deforming instead.

coincidences happen all the time. as i said, the same was the case with 9-11. people said it looked like a controlled demolition (except that it didn't), or that the towers were supposed to withstand an airplane crashing into them (a b-25, not a jumbo-jet), or that steel doesn't melt until way above the burn temperature for jet fuel (true, but steel loses 70% rigidity at half of its melting point, and all the insulation as torn off the support beams by the crash).

the facts just don't support the wild theories. occam's razor, people.

[IPD]

scooter, there is no way in holy fuck that JFK was shot from behind at ground level. BOTH shots (the 2 that hit him) entrance/exit wounds just cannot support that theory.

if you want to go crazy on conspiracies regarding JFK's murder, you could at least try convincing me that Jack Ruby and LHO were part of a larger conspiracy to cover up someone (or some organization) wanting JFK bumped off. That, I might possibly be persuaded of. trying to convince me that LHO didn't act alone? rubbish.