Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 90

Thread: If you were going to replace your 3/S..

  1. #1
    Forum User verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    ~2006

    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA/Wheeling, WV
    Posts
    867
    Thanks
    36
    Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts

    If you were going to replace your 3/S..

    What would you get? Realistically, not if you won the lottery or something.

    Lately I've been itching to get a lighter, RWD car like a Miata, S2000, RX7, BRZ, etc. I feel like I am missing out in the handling/true sports car feel department. Don't think I will ever get rid of this car though because I would never get my investment out of it. Plus I worry I would get the other car and realize I was just going with the whole "grass is greener on the other side" thing and miss the power/comfort of the VR4.

  2. #2
    1993 rt/tt Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2005

    Location
    wa state
    Posts
    813
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 181 Times in 119 Posts
    Tough question as I like all of our attributes, and not being willing to sacrifice one limits the options...

    ...that said, once our daughter wanders off to college we will more than likely go back to another corvette
    if you cant fix it with a hammer...then you have an electrical problem


  3. #3
    A TT Stealth would be solid But that will happen when I'm done having fun with my non-turbo. That being said I also wouldn't mind owning an STi or an EVO. I've driven the STi and find them a fun car. The list could go on... But I'd really enjoy a new viper. RWD and 600+hp in a 6spd. What could be better.

  4. #4
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    SLK 55 AMG. The r172's have 422hp, but I'd probably settle for the 360hp r171's (black series was 390hp). Faster than a same-year base corvette in the 1/4. Way more comfortable and refined ride than a vette, z4, boxter, etc. Plus, the r171's look a lot like the SLR's and the r172's look a lot like the SLS.

    I'm so set on it that I will be buying one when I get back stateside...regardless of what I do with my 3/s.

  5. #5
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Owner Since
    2010

    Location
    Sweden, Gothenburg
    Posts
    835
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 49 Times in 38 Posts
    Wouldn't mind a Honda NSX with targa top. Way to expensive for me right now though. But in 3-5 years or so hopefully.

  6. #6
    Member verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Owner Since
    2010

    Location
    Decatur, TN
    Posts
    1,671
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 71 Times in 60 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PearlWhiteR/T View Post
    A TT Stealth would be solid But that will happen when I'm done having fun with my non-turbo. That being said I also wouldn't mind owning an STi or an EVO. I've driven the STi and find them a fun car. The list could go on... But I'd really enjoy a new viper. RWD and 600+hp in a 6spd. What could be better.
    STi is the more streetable between the two, and I could live with it for day to day usage..Since the 3S has been relegated to permanent project status and doesn't get use though, might as well say I'd replace it with an Evo :P

    Truthfully, wouldn't mind an RX8. Enough power to suit, very comfortable (IMO), still tons of fun on mountain roads and a wealth of parts available for them. Unfortunately, an FD would be way out of my price range.
    Mods: 2g 3k body conversion, 2g Brake upgrade, Rota P45R rims
    Projects: Interior sound deadening, 14Bs, forged bottom end, custom radiator and sound mounts

  7. #7
    JNS Engineering verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    1994

    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,112
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked 155 Times in 110 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by IPD View Post
    SLK 55 AMG. The r172's have 422hp, but I'd probably settle for the 360hp r171's (black series was 390hp). Faster than a same-year base corvette in the 1/4. Way more comfortable and refined ride than a vette, z4, boxter, etc. Plus, the r171's look a lot like the SLR's and the r172's look a lot like the SLS.

    I'm so set on it that I will be buying one when I get back stateside...regardless of what I do with my 3/s.
    I could never get past the fugly front end on the r171. The r172 is much better looking IMO. But I would seriously consider the SL class R230 AMG which had the supercharged V8 and 493 ponies.

    Mod list (scroll down the page)
    JNS Engineering has your Spyders covered (and uncovered too!!)

  8. #8
    Administrator Alan92RTTT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Owner Since
    02/1998

    Location
    Madison Heights, Mi
    Posts
    2,958
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 675 Times in 255 Posts
    I'll never sell the Stealth.

    I might sell the SL. If I did I'd probably get a 370Z or a new Mustang.

  9. #9
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimvr4 View Post
    I could never get past the fugly front end on the r171. The r172 is much better looking IMO. But I would seriously consider the SL class R230 AMG which had the supercharged V8 and 493 ponies.
    i've never heard anyone call the r171 fugly. at least not the front end. or were you talking about the r170?

    p.s.

    I like some of the SL AMG's. They're also WAY out of my price range--even used. Like 2x as much as SLK AMG's for any given year.

  10. #10
    JNS Engineering verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    1994

    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,112
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked 155 Times in 110 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by IPD View Post
    i've never heard anyone call the r171 fugly. at least not the front end. or were you talking about the r170?

    p.s.

    I like some of the SL AMG's. They're also WAY out of my price range--even used. Like 2x as much as SLK AMG's for any given year.
    Actually I think I like the r170 better than the r171. Maybe it's just me but I don't like how the hood descends around the emblem. r172 is much improved. I actually saw like a 2004 SL AMG for low 20's a couple years ago but decided the maintenance risk was too high.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • History
  • Information
  • Groups
  • Events
  • Resources
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net