Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 135

Thread: Gauging interest in custom sidemount intercoolers w/9.75" x 11.75" x 4.5" Bell Cores

  1. #21
    1993 rt/tt Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2005

    Location
    wa state
    Posts
    813
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 181 Times in 119 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Fast View Post
    CFM is a measurement of flow capacity and restriction. We really only want to be reliant on demanding 75% of the full capacity. That way it maintains its flow characteristics and btu rating and you don't heat soak it.
    Fair enough, but the question remains...even at 75% of capacity you are talking about 900hp, a number I will not be seeing without a lottery win, which would make this a moot point
    if you cant fix it with a hammer...then you have an electrical problem


  2. #22
    Banned J. Fast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    - O - SIX -

    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2,711
    Thanks
    405
    Thanked 200 Times in 140 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ange View Post
    The cores may be 900 cfm but that doesn't matter when you put 2" pipes on there.



    Based on that you may aswell use thinner cores. Say 3,5". Which means better adapted cfm for most turbos (less lag) means better outside airflow and cooling through the core.
    You can transfer more heat with more heat transfer area. Ir-regardless of the choke point of the inlet outlet diameter, the inlet/outlet temperature is more critical as well as the time the liquid spends in the exchanger. I want it to slow down, which will result in a pressure drop. Tthe longer air(liquid) spends in the heat exchanger the greater the btu transfer.

    The cores by themselves weigh 15lbs. That's a significant density. I learned a lot when I increased my radiator and intercooler to 3 times the stock capacity, weight, and density. The bigger core is what you want for performance, especially when your intercooler inlet temp is 450 degrees on little TD-04 turbos. A 3.5" core or a core weighing 5 lbs lighter with an effective CFM and btu exchange rate 20% less yields less power. The temp differential from the temperature alone is worth about 10% in horsepower.

  3. #23
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2000

    Posts
    1,241
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked 91 Times in 64 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ange View Post
    The cores may be 900 cfm but that doesn't matter when you put 2" pipes on there.



    Based on that you may aswell use thinner cores. Say 3,5". Which means better adapted cfm for most turbos (less lag) means better outside airflow and cooling through the core.
    585 cfm is where 2" piping is starting to be restrictive and flow losses are experienced.
    its ok that the piping have a little pressure loss too. the cores are also rated at 900cfm@ 1 psig pressure loss across the intercooler core and a charge-air pressure of 10 psig .

    '2" piping could flow about 720cfm or so with a pressure drop of about 1.1 psi' at compressor inlet conditions. sure the 2" piping would not be ideal if someone plans to push these cores to the flow limit, 2.25" or 2.5 piping would be about a perfect match in that case .
    Last edited by mb7050; 11-01-2013 at 08:21 PM.

  4. #24
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2000

    Posts
    1,241
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked 91 Times in 64 Posts
    fiy to you all who wish to keep the stock piping and run more boost with it.


    according to this calculator and remember this is just straight smooth pipe no bends.
    Compressed Air Pipe Lines - Online Pressure Drop Calculator

    ninja edit
    even at low boost of 15psi and at low 360cfm flow our stock 1.5 " ID IC piping alone have a total pressure drop of 1.6 psi, it gets exponentially worse with more boost/flow!
    now upgrade the piping to 2" 0.3 psi pressure drop at the same 15psi of boost and flow !
    Last edited by mb7050; 11-02-2013 at 04:28 AM.

  5. #25
    Banned J. Fast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    - O - SIX -

    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2,711
    Thanks
    405
    Thanked 200 Times in 140 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mb7050 View Post
    fiy to you all who wish to keep the stock piping and run more boost with it.


    according to this calculator and remember this is just straight smooth pipe no bends.
    Compressed Air Pipe Lines - Online Pressure Drop Calculator


    even at low boost of 15psi and at low 360cfm flow our stock 1.5 " ID IC piping alone have a total pressure drop of 2.84 psi, it gets exponentially worse with more boost/flow!
    now upgrade the piping to 2" 0.6 psi pressure drop at the same 15psi of boost and flow !
    Yeah kinda... The calcuator you just linked to from engineering toolbox is absolute pressure based. Say its fairbto assume DR750R's or Billet Evo 16g's flow 750cfm at 25psi gauge pressure per turbo... At absolute of sea level you would add 14.7psi to the 25psi. . According to the calculator 11 feet of pipe flowing 750cfm at 40psi absolute has a pressure drop of 1psi. No big deal at all really. You lose like 15 horsepower. What you gain in 40 degree cooler ait from time in core and density scatter is 40 horsepower .. You want the big core.


    EDIT: I used the following values in the imperical calculator:

    q = 750 (cfm)
    L = 11 (length of piping ft)
    d = 2 (inside diameter of intercooler piping in.)
    p = 40 (absolute pressure = 14.7psi + 25psi)
    TOTAL PRESSURE DROP = 1.08psi
    Last edited by J. Fast; 11-01-2013 at 10:09 PM.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to J. Fast For This Useful Post:


  7. #26
    Member verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Owner Since
    2010

    Location
    Decatur, TN
    Posts
    1,671
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 71 Times in 60 Posts
    Love the idea of this, pity it's way out of my price range for now. Would need to sell my single core FMIC..And maybe an organ or two, would be worth it though :P
    Mods: 2g 3k body conversion, 2g Brake upgrade, Rota P45R rims
    Projects: Interior sound deadening, 14Bs, forged bottom end, custom radiator and sound mounts

  8. #27
    Banned J. Fast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    - O - SIX -

    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2,711
    Thanks
    405
    Thanked 200 Times in 140 Posts
    Using the same imperial unit calculator for stock intercooler piping and say 9b's at 15psi.

    q = 360 (cfm)
    L = 11 (length of IC piping in ft)
    d = 1.5" (inside diameter in.)
    p = 30 (absolute pressure 14.7atm + 15psi boost)

    TOTAL PRESSURE DROP = 1.6psi.

    When you increase the hose pressure the total pressure drop decreases because the weight behind it gets heavier.

    There is a choke point but I really don't think you can hit it because you can make the power. I believe Ray P makes 750hp on stock intercooler piping and DR750's at 30psi.

  9. #28
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2000

    Posts
    1,241
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked 91 Times in 64 Posts
    yup I think your right. I wondered why I got such high pressure drops, lol

    according to the calculator Ray P may have over 4 psi pressure drop in the piping alone if he really is using the stock pipes .
    I wouldnt want to have anymore than 1,5-2psi max pressure drop in the IC piping.

    according to this ( http://www.3sgto.org/turbo-engines-s...html#post69395 )


    as early as at 320 cfm, and air tube diameter = 1.5 in the 1.5 piping reaches 0.395mach (0.4 mach is the point at which airflow meets increased resistance (drag) and flow losses are experienced) FWIW if going with Corky Bells recommendations from old school book maximum boost the stock piping would be good for about ~~640cfm or about ~~420 crank hp max.
    the 2" piping would be then good for the ~~1,180 CFM or about 650 awhp, or about 780 crank hp max(as Ange mentioned before).
    also if you consult Bell intercoolers(Gerhard Schruf) they will recommend larger piping than dual 2" even for 650 awhp or 1,180 CFM , i believe they still use this math and always advice to stay under .4 mach ...
    Last edited by mb7050; 11-09-2013 at 07:06 PM.

  10. #29
    Are there any piping kits in 2.25/2.5? running these w/ CX seems like a waste. I know of DN, but finding those are hard.

  11. #30
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Owner Since
    2010

    Location
    Sweden, Gothenburg
    Posts
    835
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 49 Times in 38 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by hated View Post
    Are there any piping kits in 2.25/2.5? running these w/ CX seems like a waste. I know of DN, but finding those are hard.
    keep in mind that to make use of 2.25" pipes you also need a 3"+ throttle body and plenum inlet. oem bottleneck and plenum would bottleneck alot using 2.25" pipes.

    oem 2.35" plenum and tb are perfectly adapted for oem 1.65" pipes.
    Last edited by Ange; 11-09-2013 at 04:51 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering