Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 100

Thread: 90's Japanese sports cars and aging

  1. #41
    I don't bite
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Southern IN
    Posts
    1,996
    Thanks
    59
    Thanked 98 Times in 80 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamVR4 View Post
    About a week ago, I dreamed I had a complete Euro conversion sitting in the dining room.

    I woke up SO DISAPPOINTED! I didn't even realize how much I liked it.



    It looked better in my dream
    Poor camera angle. Most people don't seem to understand how to photograph a 3S to accentuate the hourglass
    1992 Kilder Green VR4 - First 4G swap in a 3S. 2.0, auto, awd. 9.65 at 143mph. Now LS swapped. 8.52 at 162.

  2. #42
    Mad JDM Tite
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Location
    STL
    Posts
    624
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 88 Times in 65 Posts
    Something to consider when comparing these cars aesthetically is that both the Supra and RX7 being viewed are the 2nd gen restylings of the cars, so using a first gen 3000gt isn't really an apples to apples comparison. The 1st gen 3000gt should be compared to the MKIII Supra and FC3S. A 94-95 model 3000gt is truly the fair comparison for the MKIV and FD.

    As for the Z32 leg humping, it is a Z car from Nissan, that like a Corvette, gets to exploit pedigree when its performance or substance falls a little short.

  3. #43
    BAD ASS - I've got one Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2/2010

    Location
    L'Anse, MI
    Posts
    2,476
    Thanks
    1,262
    Thanked 594 Times in 488 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by familyMAN View Post
    Poor camera angle. Most people don't seem to understand how to photograph a 3S to accentuate the hourglass
    This ^^.

    Exactly what I've been chasing with every pic I've tried to take of my car.

    Look at the car = hourglass.

    Take a pic = WTF?

    I'd been away from cars for so long, I am only now arriving at some of the old hat conclusions you guys have been onto for years, but I still think viewing a 3S at the right angle puts it on top of the pack.

    The rest of them are (to me) evocative of any number of other body-styles.

    Also: I think the issue of whether or not these things are aging well is a bit off - I think the profiles that attract us are better-termed 'ageless', a la the GT40/Ford GT.

    There's a reason they ripped themselves off, I think.
    Last edited by j2k4; 08-29-2013 at 10:05 AM.
    Ranked No. #1 in initial quality

    Idiots, simply by being idiots, seem capable of achieving randomly bad things that are beyond the imaginings of sensible people.

  4. #44
    LW fears my posts Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    1996, 1st Stealth TT; 2000, current TT

    Location
    Dallas TX
    Posts
    704
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked 121 Times in 102 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ange View Post
    The 3s can quite easely drop 450lbs from stock without much comfort sacrafice though. That and added power would most likely have them give another opinion on it.
    With my car, I did just that. Some of the major weight loss items... Fiberglass hood, wheels, CFDS, Stillen DP and Super Drager exhaust (that shaved off a TON of weight on the exhaust), flywheel, battery, crank pulley, charcoal canister, spare/jack/etc, smaller lightweight steering wheel, and all the little things you can get rid of. My fiberglass hood also had a big scoop in the center... Over 70mph, you could start to feel the front end feel more planted to the road because of the extra air being forced into the engine bay.

    In the end... none of that stuff could change the steering dynamics of the car. The stock steering rack is sloppy and has too much play. The car has a front weight bias which doesn't lend itself to changing direction as fast as is possible, and the suspension components themselves are all made out of steel with thick rubber bushings. The chassis is heavy, but it isn't very stiff. On a Porsche, all that stuff is much tighter, made of aluminum, and there's a rear weight bias so the front end feels incredibly light and controlled. When I jack up one side of my 911, the whole side of the car raises and both wheels come off the ground easily, whether I jack from the front or rear side jack point. On the Stealth, I used to have to raise it HIGH to get the other wheel to come off the ground, because the chassis would flex so much.

    I'd actually been researching how to adapt a BMW M3 steering rack to our cars. I'm convinced it's possible without too much work actually, just need to weld a few mounting points on, and mate the steering shaft to the stock shaft. I think it was the 96-98 racks that would work best, IIRC. But then I kinda caught myself and realized it didn't make much sense to do that when my Boxster S already handled like I wanted the Stealth to do... right out of the box.

  5. #45
    I don't own a VR4! Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2007

    Location
    Andover, MN
    Posts
    529
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
    I think the 3000GT is a nicely styled car and has a more aggressive look to it. The Supra has very simple lines and it is a very smooth looking car. The RX7 is one of my favorites of the bunch, I really appreciate an RX7 in person more than I do in pictures. The 300ZX I am torn on simply because I don't see them often and because I am not fond of the back end, it has a dated back end that looks like a Trans-Am/IrocZ and the front end doesn't look that great either. Of the bunch, the 3000GT looks the nicest because it is longer, has a wider wheelbase, and looks very nice with new wheels and coilovers.
    Your 1993 Dodge Stealth is one of 6351 that received VIN numbers. Based on the order of the serial numbers, your car was the 5212nd out of the 6351 that were made that year.
    Your car was built in the 3rd week of February 1993. Of the 47380 vehicles made at the Nayoga plant, your car was the 40537th vehicle to be created that year.
    There are 281 other cars that were made with both the same interior and exterior color. There are 779 cars with the same exterior color and 2316 cars with the same interior color.
    Note: The production order is assigned based on the order of the serial number.

  6. #46
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2002

    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    990
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked 85 Times in 61 Posts
    The FD's body was finalized around 88/89 fwiw. Development of the REW engine pushed it off until it being released in 92.

    Jason

    Silverstone Metallic 94 R2 FD and a Silver 2015 F250 Lariat Ultimate CCSB 6.7PSD
    Sold: Black 99 VR4 and two Pearl White 93 VR4's. Just say NO to FMIC's

  7. #47
    I don't bite
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Southern IN
    Posts
    1,996
    Thanks
    59
    Thanked 98 Times in 80 Posts
    Where are the turbo MR2 pics???

  8. #48
    Forum User verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    August 2010

    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,494
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 57 Times in 46 Posts
    I think the MR2's fit in with the DSM, Honda/Acura crowd more than the 'supercars'...pleasure meeting you today btw..
    Last edited by NOMIEZVR4; 08-29-2013 at 08:21 PM.

  9. #49
    Wrench Monkey Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2005

    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    712
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 26 Times in 19 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by UTRacerX9 View Post
    With my car, I did just that. Some of the major weight loss items... Fiberglass hood, wheels, CFDS, Stillen DP and Super Drager exhaust (that shaved off a TON of weight on the exhaust), flywheel, battery, crank pulley, charcoal canister, spare/jack/etc, smaller lightweight steering wheel, and all the little things you can get rid of. My fiberglass hood also had a big scoop in the center... Over 70mph, you could start to feel the front end feel more planted to the road because of the extra air being forced into the engine bay.

    In the end... none of that stuff could change the steering dynamics of the car. The stock steering rack is sloppy and has too much play. The car has a front weight bias which doesn't lend itself to changing direction as fast as is possible, and the suspension components themselves are all made out of steel with thick rubber bushings. The chassis is heavy, but it isn't very stiff. On a Porsche, all that stuff is much tighter, made of aluminum, and there's a rear weight bias so the front end feels incredibly light and controlled. When I jack up one side of my 911, the whole side of the car raises and both wheels come off the ground easily, whether I jack from the front or rear side jack point. On the Stealth, I used to have to raise it HIGH to get the other wheel to come off the ground, because the chassis would flex so much.

    I'd actually been researching how to adapt a BMW M3 steering rack to our cars. I'm convinced it's possible without too much work actually, just need to weld a few mounting points on, and mate the steering shaft to the stock shaft. I think it was the 96-98 racks that would work best, IIRC. But then I kinda caught myself and realized it didn't make much sense to do that when my Boxster S already handled like I wanted the Stealth to do... right out of the box.
    On that note, since putting coilovers on, mine lifts the whole side from either jack point. Almost evenly. Not sure what relevance that has, but thought I'd throw that out there.
    1997 3000GT VR4 - Solano Black Pearl - E85 - E316G-BIG - All the boost
    1993 3000GT VR4 - Maroon/Blacktop - Back to stock/Restoration
    1994 Stealth R/T - Primer - Parts store

  10. #50
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Owner Since
    2010

    Location
    Sweden, Gothenburg
    Posts
    835
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 49 Times in 38 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by UTRacerX9 View Post
    With my car, I did just that. Some of the major weight loss items... Fiberglass hood, wheels, CFDS, Stillen DP and Super Drager exhaust (that shaved off a TON of weight on the exhaust), flywheel, battery, crank pulley, charcoal canister, spare/jack/etc, smaller lightweight steering wheel, and all the little things you can get rid of. My fiberglass hood also had a big scoop in the center... Over 70mph, you could start to feel the front end feel more planted to the road because of the extra air being forced into the engine bay.

    In the end... none of that stuff could change the steering dynamics of the car. The stock steering rack is sloppy and has too much play. The car has a front weight bias which doesn't lend itself to changing direction as fast as is possible, and the suspension components themselves are all made out of steel with thick rubber bushings. The chassis is heavy, but it isn't very stiff. On a Porsche, all that stuff is much tighter, made of aluminum, and there's a rear weight bias so the front end feels incredibly light and controlled. When I jack up one side of my 911, the whole side of the car raises and both wheels come off the ground easily, whether I jack from the front or rear side jack point. On the Stealth, I used to have to raise it HIGH to get the other wheel to come off the ground, because the chassis would flex so much.

    I'd actually been researching how to adapt a BMW M3 steering rack to our cars. I'm convinced it's possible without too much work actually, just need to weld a few mounting points on, and mate the steering shaft to the stock shaft. I think it was the 96-98 racks that would work best, IIRC. But then I kinda caught myself and realized it didn't make much sense to do that when my Boxster S already handled like I wanted the Stealth to do... right out of the box.
    maybe coilovers and poly bushings would make the steering less "sloppy" for you? The car is a GT, setup for comfort, not performance/track.

    About weightdistrubution not much to do. Goes with the front engine. Best thing we can do is to shave as much weight in the front as possible.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering