i can't fault peyton for the underachievements of vanderjagt. i also can't fault him too directly for his performance. the truth is, defense wins games--especially super bowls. ask the raiders how the #1 offense worked out against the former dungee bucs. peyton's performance in "the big games" is--imho--largely due to a lackluster defense giving it up more than a thai hooker. when your D lets the opponent score willy-nilly, you end up in a "must-score" situation for your offense. this puts additional and un-necessary pressure on your QB, which--in turn--can often generate turnovers because he's having to make riskier plays.
for example, look at how the colts would play with a defensive playmaker like Bob Sanders was actually healthy. the colts were dramatically better when the likes of Harper, June, Freeny and Sanders were all healthy and playing 100%. pushing any QB to compensate for an injured or underperforming defense is a sure-fire method for losing a big game. it may work in a high-scoring shootout victory in the regular season...but not in the post-season.
same thing applies to KC. chargers should not have won that game--especially after all the blunders they made. unfortunately, alex smith--who is a middle-of-the-pack QB--can't compensate for a severely compromised D. Brad Johnson isn't a QB of legend by any means...yet he was all that the bucs needed to edge out the raiders--thanks to a very good defense.
and the one thing that Brady has had behind him for his entire career...is a good defense. Dan Marino would be the greatest QB of all time by a country mile if he'd had any quality defense behind him for the duration of his career.




Reply With Quote







Bookmarks