I agree the Geneva Conventions have merit but do not apply, Thadd - problem is, the international community does NOT agree, and that's where my mention comes in - for their own reasons, they don't feel compelled to develop a separate body of policy to deal with terrorism; in fact, they willfully ignore the need.
I agree on your other points as well, relative to due-process, etc., but I think a bit of a line should be drawn between domestic acts and any connection with overseas sponsorship.
Think along these lines:
A terrorist encampment somewhere on the sands of the mideast...we know it's there, the country hosting it knows it is there (but disavows knowledge), but for 'official' purposes, it doesn't exist.
What harm if it ceased to exist in the literal sense as well?
Such a strategy might serve to enlighten.
I don't recall we had 'permission' to kill Bin Laden - do you?



Reply With Quote






Bookmarks