Likely because the biggest issue normally is that people kink the hard line on the sender when removing. At that point, you either have to go AN bulkhead, or braze a new extension of solid tube on there with an adapter for the stock line and then flare the end I think.
My question Stealthee, now that I'm thinking about it, is that it still doesn't swivel so wouldn't crimping be out of the question anyhow since crimping would just make it a stock replacement? I think Chris' point (if I understood it properly) was that you could now tighten down each end properly, then slide the clamps over the hose, then put the hose on the barbs and tighten it down to ensure no leaks there. Thus a proper leakfree solution.
This does resolve issues for anyone who has a cracked rubber fuel line at least.
Best I can figure would be if you could get an couple
8mm or 5/16" barb (or AN5) to AN fitting and a
swivel AN union/coupler fitting, that you could install that in the middle of the line to allow easy disconnect and install just each half at a time. That said, it does add about $30 onto the cost of the replacement.
Bookmarks