Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 57 of 57

Thread: Running a piggyback with the flash ECU

  1. #51
    Quote Originally Posted by NOMIEZVR4 View Post
    IDK about you, but I like to keep cussing and *itching to a minimum when under the hood of my car...I despise cars that are a PITA to work on...hence why I have no ABS, no AWS, No EGR/Vac-Lines/Charcoal Canister/Clutch Booster, No Cruise, No washer bottle, front turbo IC piping running under and no battery Still got full power steering and A/C though..

    With the help of my tech, I've timed 1hr and 20 mins from driving the car onto the lift to having the motor on the ground.. ...but I'm not tying to set records doing that kinda stuff...lol..
    What do you do about emission testing?
    98 3000GT VR4
    91 Stealth TT.. Retired

  2. #52
    Forum User verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    August 2010

    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,494
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 57 Times in 46 Posts
    In IL 98 and older cars are exempt from testing. Plus I have FlashECU...I can change the periphery settings.

  3. #53
    Forum User supporter
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Owner Since
    2012

    Location
    Fruita, Colorado
    Posts
    30
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greg E View Post
    The SD code for the EVO isn't perfect. There are random low throttle drivability stutters. It also take a very long time to dial in correctly.

    AEM has wideband correctional feedback which always fine tunes the mixture on the fly all the time. Kinda like the closed loop feature of the stock ECU.
    Not completely true. SD2.0 is much better then SD1.0, I ran SD2.0 on my Evo for years. Then I went to a Vipec. When I tune evo's on SD its not bad at all. As long as you have your MAF settings right you can get SD dialed in pretty quick (yes the MAF tables are still referenced). The low down stutter issues were big when it was first patched to SD, some (most) of them came from doing SD on a ROM that belonged to a ECU that didn't have a MAP sensor, so the code was added. Using 941 was much better then using 965. While not as smooth as my Vipec is, its still smooth. It does have a couple hickups every once in awhile, but for the most part nothing is wrong with SD on the stock evo ECU's.

  4. #54
    I lack color... verified

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Aug 1998

    Posts
    3,589
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked 498 Times in 241 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by llabmik2 View Post
    Not completely true.

    It does have a couple hickups every once in awhile.
    I'm confused.

    Didn't I say that same thing?

    2014 Exomotive Exocet - #101 "shocker yellow" - 1.8L 5-speed 3.9 torsen FMII powered
    Read more: http://mevowners.proboards.com/threa.../greg-pa-build

    99 Solano Black VR4 - #16 of 287 - ground up restoration - sold
    98 Pearl White VR4 #54 of 231 - 12.84@105mph - 93 Octane 12.50@107mph - 100 Octane with Chromed ECU - sold
    99 Pearl White VR4 #108 of 287 - 3RD place stock car class ECG 11 - Sold
    98 Black VR4: 100% stock - totalled by an Illegal 2-12-08
    95 White Stealth TT - 11.852 @ 118.25 - sold
    95 SSG Stealth TT - 11.981 @ 115.81mph - sold

    "I don't actually work on cars, I just talk about them on the internet."

  5. #55
    Forum User supporter
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Owner Since
    2012

    Location
    Fruita, Colorado
    Posts
    30
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Pretty much, I was more targeting the long time to dial it in part, and for some reason got side tracked and said the same thing you did pretty much lol.

    Doesn't take long at all. If you have never done any type of SD setup I could see it being a little hard/time consuming. Once you have a gasp on what is going on, you can tune it pretty fast even with having to turn the car off every time.

    SD2.0 is still better then SD1.0. The 3D map that 2.0 gives you, gives you a ton more control over the 2D map of 1.0
    Last edited by llabmik2; 12-24-2013 at 02:28 PM.

  6. #56
    I lack color... verified

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Aug 1998

    Posts
    3,589
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked 498 Times in 241 Posts
    I've tune SD on the EVOs many times before. Got something very different in mind for us.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Greg E For This Useful Post:


  8. #57
    Forum User verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    August 2010

    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,494
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 57 Times in 46 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Greg E View Post
    I've tune SD on the EVOs many times before. Got something very different in mind for us.
    Will it provide the same spool/power benefits as SD? Secondly, with the driveability of a MAF?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering