Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 60

Thread: The Flying Kiwi (another build thread)

  1. #31
    At least my jackstands are reliable Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2005

    Location
    Rochester Hills, Mi
    Posts
    554
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 56 Times in 45 Posts
    Nice work! Best build thread ever! It appeased my instant gratification need like no other! Never would have seen the triple turbo setup coming.

    95 Base 3k: 6G74/TT/AWD conversion

  2. #32
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2002

    Posts
    1,668
    Thanks
    514
    Thanked 388 Times in 259 Posts
    The hot side makes sense. The part of this that makes my head hurt is feeding the compressor outlet of the T04 into the compressor inlets of the 9B's.

    Any concern about over-spinning the 9B's? As you increase the system's overall boost, won't the 9B pressure ratio stay pegged? Having a hard time wrapping my head around what each compressor wheel will be doing. With different waste gates controlling the T04 and the 9B's, can you say with any certainty that ALL 3 of them will ever actually open? It really seems like you would want 2 EBC's.
    Last edited by AdamVR4; 12-19-2012 at 05:08 PM.
    '93 VR4 | 10.57 @ 135 on C16 | 11.29 @ 125 on 93 | ~3275 lbs

  3. #33
    Member Not Verified
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Owner Since
    2003

    Posts
    2,062
    Thanks
    112
    Thanked 272 Times in 206 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamVR4 View Post
    The hot side makes sense. The part of this that makes my head hurt is feeding the compressor outlet of the T04 into the compressor inlets of the 9B's.

    Any concern about over-spinning the 9B's? As you increase the system's overall boost, won't the 9B pressure ratio stay pegged? Having a hard time wrapping my head around what each compressor wheel will be doing. With different waste gates controlling the T04 and the 9B's, can you say with any certainty that ALL 3 of them will ever actually open? It really seems like you would want 2 EBC's.
    If you want I can send you a lot of info about compounding to get your head around it.

  4. #34
    Padawan garage troll Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Location
    Newark, DE
    Posts
    635
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks
    68
    Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
    Love lotr film setting, Kimbra & your builds =)

    Sent from garage
    91 AWD TT
    K&N FIPK, Precats gutted, Test Pipe, Blitz DSBC, Walbro 255, Vacuum reduction, SM3, MMCd, Krank Vents, 3SX Aluminum Crank Pulley, Aluminum 2PC DS, MAFT Pro (AFC mode atm).

    To do list: Need to check electronic timing, install FP hotwire, install PS poly MM, RUACAs, Setrab oil cooler, Dejon Y-pipe, 3.5 GM Mas, FIC 650ccs & 13Ts.

  5. #35
    Banned Not Verified Blackmount's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Owner Since
    Mid-April 2011.

    Location
    Monroe WI
    Posts
    1,466
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 24 Times in 21 Posts
    Subd. First awd n/a gto ive seen in the build threads. Excited for dyno results

  6. #36
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2002

    Posts
    1,668
    Thanks
    514
    Thanked 388 Times in 259 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by anyonebutme View Post
    If you want I can send you a lot of info about compounding to get your head around it.
    Can't post the highlights here?

  7. #37
    Member Not Verified
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Owner Since
    2003

    Posts
    2,062
    Thanks
    112
    Thanked 272 Times in 206 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamVR4 View Post
    Can't post the highlights here?
    This is going to be difficult without derailing the thread, so I'll be brief here. Charles seems to explain it better than me in typing so I'll just use his words.

    "They don't work any differently than a single. You just use one compressor to alter the incoming "atmosphere" of the second. But neither charger actually "knows" it's in a compound setup. The first stage just thinks it's putting light boost into a large engine. The second stage just thinks it's putting light boost...at a few thousand feet below sea level."

    You're not compounding pressure, but pressure ratios, which is why your end boost is not boost1+boost2, but P/R1*P/R2 (IIRC, I forgot if it's addition or product). That's how you can get 100+ psi out of 2 turbos huffing well under 40 psi. Gates control the speed of the turbo, therefore the boost of each stage. Since we are talking gas engines, I'll leave out discussion of "drive pressure", which is the pressure in the exhaust manifolds.

    Yes your gates for the primary and secondary will have to be controlled independently, but an EBC is overkill for this application for either stage. You set the "high pressure" turbo first to it's optimum operating PR, for a 9b would be something like 5-8 psi, then add pressure from the "atmosphere" turbo until you reach it's optimum or the boost capability of the engine. It will be the latter for our engines. If your turbine flows enough (turbo size is nearly dead on) and your gates are large enough, you can actually do this with internal gates and/or no boost controller at all.

    Have questions, just ask.

  8. #38
    Banned J. Fast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    - O - SIX -

    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2,711
    Thanks
    405
    Thanked 200 Times in 140 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by anyonebutme View Post
    This is going to be difficult without derailing the thread, so I'll be brief here. Charles seems to explain it better than me in typing so I'll just use his words.

    "They don't work any differently than a single. You just use one compressor to alter the incoming "atmosphere" of the second. But neither charger actually "knows" it's in a compound setup. The first stage just thinks it's putting light boost into a large engine. The second stage just thinks it's putting light boost...at a few thousand feet below sea level."

    You're not compounding pressure, but pressure ratios, which is why your end boost is not boost1+boost2, but P/R1*P/R2 (IIRC, I forgot if it's addition or product). That's how you can get 100+ psi out of 2 turbos huffing well under 40 psi. Gates control the speed of the turbo, therefore the boost of each stage. Since we are talking gas engines, I'll leave out discussion of "drive pressure", which is the pressure in the exhaust manifolds.

    Yes your gates for the primary and secondary will have to be controlled independently, but an EBC is overkill for this application for either stage. You set the "high pressure" turbo first to it's optimum operating PR, for a 9b would be something like 5-8 psi, then add pressure from the "atmosphere" turbo until you reach it's optimum or the boost capability of the engine. It will be the latter for our engines. If your turbine flows enough (turbo size is nearly dead on) and your gates are large enough, you can actually do this with internal gates and/or no boost controller at all.

    Have questions, just ask.
    I'll add to what Chris said Adam.

    In early 2010 I was considering fitting a compound turbo. I consulted with a bunch of diesel guys at Turbo Forums since coumpounding is quite prevalent with them. What I quickly discovered was it was quite cost prohibitive and the piping was very difficult to fit. The biggest prohibitive factor was heat. The heat produced in a compound setup was thermodynamically proven to be extraordinarily high. It was going to to be quite difficult to manage because Air to Air intercooling capability is significantly lower than I'd initially estimated. After doing some planning I ditched the project, sold my exhaust flanges off to Frostedbutts, and decided to keep things simple (like Ninja mentioned). That's when I heeded some good advice for once and swapped to the KISS method. I chose to install an IPS Evo III kit instead.

    I was collaborating with a guy on Turbo Forums named RyanMayo that had recently fitted a Nissan 300zx with a compound turbo setup. He helped me size turbo's for a 1000bhp engine build and confirmed my math to be correct.

    Here's an excerpt from that thread for the information you seek:

    Quote Originally Posted by RyanMayo
    Quote Originally Posted by J.Fast
    The initial starting point is where I'm hung up... I'll try and do the math and hopefully you guys can double check it for me and then once it can be confirmed it's right we'll go from there. So to do this I ineed to calc the volumetric airflow requirement, the stage 1 turbocharger compressor outlet temperature, the stage 1 density ratio, the stage 2 compressor outlet temperature, the stage 2 density ratio, the combined density ratio, and the intercooler density change?

    Volumetric airflow(cfm) = RPM (X) Displacement (X) .5 (X) (volumetric efficiency/1728)

    Absolute compressor outlet temp = Compressor inlet temp (*R) + (((Compressor inlet temp (x) Pressure Ratio) - Compressor inlet temp) / Compressor Efficiency)

    Density ratio = (Inlet absolute air temp(*R) / Outlet temperature(*R)) (X) Pressure Ratio

    Combined density ratio = 1st stage density ratio (X) 2nd stage density ratio

    Intercooler density change = (Stage 2 compressor outlet / Stage 1 compressor outlet) - 1

    Used my thermodynamics book for this so hopefully this equation setup is right.

    Jeremy
    I'll reiterate again that I'm not sure I know as much about this as I think I know, so I may be off and take what I write as an opinion. It's certainly not a definitive lesson on the topic.

    So how I would start is the same way you have: by figuring the cfm of the engine. I'll just go ahead and ASSume 7000rpm and 90%ve for that, which equals 345cfm.

    Now the question is what's the cfm I need to make 1000hp? I figure on 1lb/min equaling 10hp, so that's 100lbs/min. And 1lb/min equals 14.47cfm at 1 atmosphere (14.7psia) so we want to flow 1,447cfm to make 1,000hp.

    1,447/345=4.19 round to 4.2
    take the square rt of 4.2 = ~2.05 <-that's the pressure ratio I want each turbo to hit.

    To find the flow rate needed for the second stage, I would just use this calculator: Not2Fast: Turbo Calculator

    After plugging in all the engine variables and using 15.4psi, (roughly equal to 2.05pr,) it tells me the small turbo needs to draw 655cfm, or the equivalent of 49lb/min, if it were drawing from atmosphere. Although it's not drawing from atmosphere, I think it should work when looking at compressor maps.

    So, first stage turbo should flow 100lb/min of air, and second stage should flow 49lb/min of air when looking at compressor maps. Both should be just above the 2:1pr line. Looking at Garrett maps, a GT4718 and a GT3582 would work well. As for the turbines, I don't even know where to start haha.

    None of this takes into account the effect that heat has on the density of the charge, but there's no question that a GT4718 can make the power, and the 3582 would be a decent match to the motor as well. So if you were to use these turbos I'd plan on maybe having to gun a little more boost than what I've figured here. If I were to change anything I'd maybe go a little larger on the secondary turbo, but not by much.

    Hope this helps you, and I look forward to seeing what you do with this. It's really interesting and I think I probably stand to learn a thing or two.
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Fast
    Haha that calculator is funny... I have this one saved in my fav's tab: Index page :: motorgeek.com

    Oky so I Math'd this out, posting it would be a nightmare so maybe I'll scan my chicken scratch. I'm looking at some serious exponential factors.

    Givens: psia elevation factor in Colorado 12.5, 6000rpm, 70* ambient temp, 90%V.E, 189 CID, 295cfm airflow(22.4lb per min)

    Math I came up with:

    Final discharge temp with heating effect: 481*F (no interstage intercooler)
    Final intake temp with 80% intercooler: 96*F
    Stage 1 Compressor flow demand: 2.2 Pressure Ratio, 37.4lb per min
    Stage 2 Compressor flow demand: 2.2 Pressure Ratio, 62.5lb per min

    Final pressure ratio: 6.1 = 76psia

    Boost pressure 15 psi

    I'll double check this again... the numbers are makin me headspin.
    As you can see 2.2P.R. being fed into a 2.2P.R. at 15psi has a final net psia of 76psia. That's effectively 1400CFM at 15psi with a gt 47feeding a 35R... crazy! So I'm thinking about what box has going on... I haven't done math like that in a couple years (and I don't even know for sure if I setup the equations right) but I'll try to run a calc at 10psi for the 9b twins and the T04 and see what the final estimated psia comes out to. I'm guessing at 12psi its likely to have an equivalent CFM of somewhere around 30psi. Let me run some numbers.

    To answer your question of what's got you hung up... Yes, the 9b's are a restiction... but they're also dividing the final P.R. back out. That's what makes this setup so cool. It's really difficult to calculate airflow. Hence why I was asking box for his AIT and kpa numbers.

    Do you have that data, box? yYur AIT's and your GM Mas Hz numbers... or Kpa figures?
    Last edited by J. Fast; 12-20-2012 at 08:55 PM.

  9. #39
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Owner Since

    Posts
    203
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 31 Times in 22 Posts
    No numbers yet, will get some as soon as I start boosting

  10. #40
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2002

    Posts
    1,668
    Thanks
    514
    Thanked 388 Times in 259 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by anyonebutme View Post
    This is going to be difficult without derailing the thread, so I'll be brief here. Charles seems to explain it better than me in typing so I'll just use his words.

    "They don't work any differently than a single. You just use one compressor to alter the incoming "atmosphere" of the second. But neither charger actually "knows" it's in a compound setup. The first stage just thinks it's putting light boost into a large engine. The second stage just thinks it's putting light boost...at a few thousand feet below sea level."

    You're not compounding pressure, but pressure ratios, which is why your end boost is not boost1+boost2, but P/R1*P/R2 (IIRC, I forgot if it's addition or product). That's how you can get 100+ psi out of 2 turbos huffing well under 40 psi. Gates control the speed of the turbo, therefore the boost of each stage. Since we are talking gas engines, I'll leave out discussion of "drive pressure", which is the pressure in the exhaust manifolds.

    Yes your gates for the primary and secondary will have to be controlled independently, but an EBC is overkill for this application for either stage. You set the "high pressure" turbo first to it's optimum operating PR, for a 9b would be something like 5-8 psi, then add pressure from the "atmosphere" turbo until you reach it's optimum or the boost capability of the engine. It will be the latter for our engines. If your turbine flows enough (turbo size is nearly dead on) and your gates are large enough, you can actually do this with internal gates and/or no boost controller at all.

    Have questions, just ask.

    Ah, so it would be quite close to perfect if you ran the 9B's at waste gate boost and the boost controller just on the T04.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering