Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: The twinkie thread

  1. #31
    1st ever COTM and COTY verified
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Owner Since
    Birth

    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    7,077
    Thanks
    649
    Thanked 451 Times in 347 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NickS VR4 View Post
    Like I've said, and no one seems to address...

    If the management bought new machines and replaced the ones from the "1920s", and combined shipments to allow wonderbread AND hostess snacks to ship on the same trucks... how many employees would be laid off, and would the unions allow that?

    The upper management probably saw that the company was going down and then took it for all its worth.

    Now I think the company will be bought, the new machines will be bought, the deliveries will be on the same trucks, and it will only require 1/2 the work force... becoming profitable. I think demand certainly wasn't growing for twinkies, but unions probably were preventing the restructuring (lay offs) and while not 100% at fault, they certainly hold some blame.
    I thought they said they needed to buy new stuff but I may have misread that.

    I think you are about spot on though. The raises were a sign they gave up already. I don't think they would have hept the place open even if they did end the strike.

    Quote Originally Posted by HilbillyHomeboy View Post
    I bet she smells of old mustard and sawdust.
    Jeremy

  2. #32
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NickS VR4 View Post
    Btw, I think rather than limit CEO pay, raises in minimum wage may be better.
    negative. raising minimum wage is like giving out pell-grants; all it does is raise the cost of college education by that amount--ACROSS THE BOARD.

    todd, 50x was the "unofficial standard" as recently as 1980. as of 2012, 380x. and when you look at company value/stock performance vs. CEO pay, there is no correlation whatsoever.

    it might be a pipe dream, but i can honestly not think of a better means by which companies will not only start better reigning-in the greed of "hired-guns", but will also help prevent insolubility problems which resulted in the bailouts we've been seeing. i know i quote nardelli a lot, but if you chopped his total compensation to 10% of what he actually made during that tenure ($50,000,000), you could put $450,000,000 towards infrastructure, dividends, success sharing, etc.

  3. #33
    Dad verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    01 Apr 03 - Jokes on me

    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    293
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked 178 Times in 121 Posts
    I agree, but by raising minimum wage you can make a larger gap between benefits (earnings) of actually working, and those that only rely on entitlements. Right now there is little incentive IMO for those living on the govt to actually get a job at minimum wage.

    Of course this will lead to a plea to increase entitlements to keep up with minimum wage... viscous cycle.


  4. #34
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    or we can just cut entitlements out altogether.


  5. #35
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    oct.2007...

    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    366
    Thanks
    130
    Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
    i just bought a twinkie from the corner store by house lol
    he told me it was his last one lol

  6. #36
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    i've seen interviews on the news about people stocking up on twinkies. funny thing is, every single person they interviewed was overweight. hmmmm.....

  7. #37
    1993 rt/tt Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2005

    Location
    wa state
    Posts
    813
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 181 Times in 119 Posts
    Hostess Mediation Fails, Liquidation To Proceed; Furious Laid Off Workers Now Turn On Labor Union | ZeroHedge

    Scott Quenneville, a Hostess truck driver represented by the Teamsters, said he feels his colleagues were misled by Mr. Hurt into believing that a buyer would swoop in for the company. Mr. Hurt on Sunday said he thought there was a good chance a buyer would emerge who would give union members their jobs back.

    "Frank misled a lot of people. He was not going to settle for anything less than closing the company down, because they didn't want that 8% pay cut," said Mr. Quenneville. "If you don't want the job, leave the job. Why ruin 18,000 jobs?"


    And heres something intersting from that article...

    Doug Mansky, a Hostess driver in Detroit and a member of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, was in the process of moving to a cheaper condominium on Tuesday, after his union had agreed to an 8% pay cut that he said would shave $200 a week from his income. After Judge Drain cleared Hostess to impose the same new labor terms on the bakers union, they went on strike.

    ...eight percent of the truck drivers pay is 200 bucks? By my simple math, that means this guy is (was) making 2500 a WEEK, extrapolated to 130k a year, to deliver twinkees?!?
    Last edited by wingnut; 11-22-2012 at 07:19 PM.
    if you cant fix it with a hammer...then you have an electrical problem


  8. #38
    Forum User Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Medford OR
    Posts
    1,420
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 602 Times in 302 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wingnut View Post
    ...eight percent of the truck drivers pay is 200 bucks? By my simple math, that means this guy is (was) making 2500 a WEEK, extrapolated to 130k a year, to deliver twinkees?!?
    By the 50X rule, the upper management was obviously severly underpaid, and needed better compensation....


    Real Performance Automotive (541)816-4500 www.FB.com/RealPerformanceAuto

  9. #39
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wingnut View Post
    Hostess Mediation Fails, Liquidation To Proceed; Furious Laid Off Workers Now Turn On Labor Union | ZeroHedge

    Scott Quenneville, a Hostess truck driver represented by the Teamsters, said he feels his colleagues were misled by Mr. Hurt into believing that a buyer would swoop in for the company. Mr. Hurt on Sunday said he thought there was a good chance a buyer would emerge who would give union members their jobs back.

    "Frank misled a lot of people. He was not going to settle for anything less than closing the company down, because they didn't want that 8% pay cut," said Mr. Quenneville. "If you don't want the job, leave the job. Why ruin 18,000 jobs?"


    And heres something intersting from that article...

    Doug Mansky, a Hostess driver in Detroit and a member of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, was in the process of moving to a cheaper condominium on Tuesday, after his union had agreed to an 8% pay cut that he said would shave $200 a week from his income. After Judge Drain cleared Hostess to impose the same new labor terms on the bakers union, they went on strike.

    ...eight percent of the truck drivers pay is 200 bucks? By my simple math, that means this guy is (was) making 2500 a WEEK, extrapolated to 130k a year, to deliver twinkees?!?
    yep. something doesn't quite sit right. i know contractors in afghanistan who aren't even making that kind of money--and they are dodging mortars.

    Quote Originally Posted by RealMcCoy View Post
    By the 50X rule, the upper management was obviously severly underpaid, and needed better compensation....
    IF he was the lowest paid employee--which he wasn't. if the story about the line-worker having to take a pay cut down to $25,000 (2nd pay cut, after his original salary was $50,000), then it would mean that the CEO couldn't earn more than 2.5M--as opposed to the 8m or whatever he was trying to draw (based on the $50,000 salary). Cutting that to $25,000 would reduce maximum CEO compensation down to 1.25 million.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering