Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 39

Thread: The twinkie thread

  1. #11
    Dad verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    01 Apr 03 - Jokes on me

    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    293
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked 178 Times in 121 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by beepbeep View Post
    How about the executives and upper management giving themselves 80% raises with the money earmarked for updating equipment and replenishing retirement funds? How about in the bankruptcy papers, they are asking for $5 million for the CEO? How about during the last negotiations, the hedge funds and management wanted the employees to completely relinquish $2 million of their own retirement benefits---just so executives could keep their pay. They are always 2 sides, folks. Easy to blame the unions (hate them, personally) but in this instance, there is more to the story.
    Like I said, if they updated the equipment, would they need that many workers? Perhaps there was no need for new machines if their work force wouldn't shrink. Then they'd have twice as many workers making twice as much necessary to operate. Just a possibility.

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2


  2. #12
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by beepbeep View Post
    How about the executives and upper management giving themselves 80% raises with the money earmarked for updating equipment and replenishing retirement funds? How about in the bankruptcy papers, they are asking for $5 million for the CEO? How about during the last negotiations, the hedge funds and management wanted the employees to completely relinquish $2 million of their own retirement benefits---just so executives could keep their pay. They are always 2 sides, folks. Easy to blame the unions (hate them, personally) but in this instance, there is more to the story.
    no, i don't have sympathy for the unions. if corporate fatf**ks want to be greedy snots and underpay the grunts--then the grunts can leave. the whole idea of a sustainable business model revolves around paying a wage which will get people to do the work you ask of them. if the bigwigs want to pad their wallets and make the model unsustainable in the process--let them. corporations are born and die off all the time. i'm not going to cry about it. when you no longer offer a product in demand, or you don't have a sustainable business model--or both--then bye-bye.

    p.s.
    this isn't a politics thread, but i will submit that replacing minimum wage with the 50x rule would probably have fixed this.

  3. #13
    1st ever COTM and COTY verified
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Owner Since
    Birth

    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    7,077
    Thanks
    649
    Thanked 451 Times in 347 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by beepbeep View Post
    How about the executives and upper management giving themselves 80% raises with the money earmarked for updating equipment and replenishing retirement funds? How about in the bankruptcy papers, they are asking for $5 million for the CEO? How about during the last negotiations, the hedge funds and management wanted the employees to completely relinquish $2 million of their own retirement benefits---just so executives could keep their pay. They are always 2 sides, folks. Easy to blame the unions (hate them, personally) but in this instance, there is more to the story.
    I think it was more like 300% for some.

    Quote Originally Posted by HilbillyHomeboy View Post
    I bet she smells of old mustard and sawdust.
    Jeremy

  4. #14
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by green-lantern View Post
    I think it was more like 300% for some.
    so hostess has bad management and goes belly-up. meanwhile, little debbies continues to make all of the same products with a different name. why people are crying over it is retarded. if there needs to be more jobs making super-saturated-fat prepackaged-foods, then lil debbies will be hiring. otherwise, the market will shrink to adjust.

    jobs that serve an extinct construct aren't legitimate jobs. if you're worried about being replaced by a robot, perhaps you should repair robots for a living.

  5. #15
    I'm so shocked to see the as expected people placing all the blame on the low-wage workers that do the actual work manufacturing the product, and none of the blame on the wealthy executives that fleeced the company for all its available cash 5 months prior to filing for chapter 11. They totally deserve those bonuses they're asking the court's permission to pay out.

  6. #16
    BAD ASS - I've got one Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2/2010

    Location
    L'Anse, MI
    Posts
    2,476
    Thanks
    1,262
    Thanked 594 Times in 488 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bluefox1081 View Post
    I'm so shocked to see the as expected people placing all the blame on the low-wage workers that do the actual work manufacturing the product, and none of the blame on the wealthy executives that fleeced the company for all its available cash 5 months prior to filing for chapter 11. They totally deserve those bonuses they're asking the court's permission to pay out.
    Absolutely agreed as to any fleecing that took place - the perpetrators should be shot and kicked for dying.

    That money should have gone to the stockholders.

    Hey, I heard too about the union stipulations that bread and Twinkies couldn't share space on the same truck, so there was a lot of redundancy in delivery routes.

    Sound dumb to you, too?
    Ranked No. #1 in initial quality

    Idiots, simply by being idiots, seem capable of achieving randomly bad things that are beyond the imaginings of sensible people.

  7. #17
    Dad verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    01 Apr 03 - Jokes on me

    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    293
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked 178 Times in 121 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4 View Post
    Absolutely agreed as to any fleecing that took place - the perpetrators should be shot and kicked for dying.

    That money should have gone to the stockholders.

    Hey, I heard too about the union stipulations that bread and Twinkies couldn't share space on the same truck, so there was a lot of redundancy in delivery routes.

    Sound dumb to you, too?
    Maybe unions wanted to have their cake and eat it too. Keep work force, but invest in efficiency. If more efficient, and output has same requirement, than a smaller work force is called for. Instead of laying off, looks like they tried to lower salaries. Stuff like not mixing products on trucks just goes to show they had too many workers and weren't being efficient.

  8. #18
    BAD ASS - I've got one Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2/2010

    Location
    L'Anse, MI
    Posts
    2,476
    Thanks
    1,262
    Thanked 594 Times in 488 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NickS VR4 View Post
    Stuff like not mixing products on trucks just goes to show they had too many workers and weren't being efficient.
    Uh, yeah.

  9. #19
    1st ever COTM and COTY verified
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Owner Since
    Birth

    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    7,077
    Thanks
    649
    Thanked 451 Times in 347 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by IPD View Post
    so hostess has bad management and goes belly-up. meanwhile, little debbies continues to make all of the same products with a different name. why people are crying over it is retarded. if there needs to be more jobs making super-saturated-fat prepackaged-foods, then lil debbies will be hiring. otherwise, the market will shrink to adjust.

    jobs that serve an extinct construct aren't legitimate jobs. if you're worried about being replaced by a robot, perhaps you should repair robots for a living.
    It's the perfect model of the issues with American business. Fucked up union, fucked up management. This was a group effort, exactly the way to kill a once thriving business. If somebody thinks the company is all to blame then they are wrong. If somebody thinks the union is all to blame then they are wrong. I will say I worked for a company that the situation was very similar. After a while they grew weary of the union BS and pretty much let the place die. They warned the union over and over until they closed the doors and the workers were like "oh shit! they weren't kidding".

    Like I said though, this is the perfect example of the reasons unions can suck and the reason the workers have the right to be pissed. We can't afford to pay you guys but we just paid the idiot in charge a million bucks to fuck the place up.

  10. #20
    Now with more poop-smear Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Not Anymore

    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,490
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    483
    Thanked 543 Times in 390 Posts
    paul, that is why i favor the 50x rule and abolishing the minimum wage. 50x was the ratio of CEO/top-exec pay to the wages of the lowest-paid employees back as recently as 1980. Clearly it's not an unreasonable ratio for the top management. Recently though, the fortune 500 has been averaging 380x ratio:

    Average Fortune 500 CEO Now Paid 380 Times As Much As The Average Worker | ThinkProgress

    By eliminating minimum wage, you allow small businesses to pay virtually whatever wages they desire--because the Owner can't possibly be collecting 50x that in in annual income; but they still have to offer something of market-value, or no one will work for them. On the other hand, by tying total CEO compensation to 50x, any CEO who wants a raise has to improve the bottom line for his company employees. This means that Wal-Mart will have to pay more than $7.25/hr. if it wants to pay it's CEO over $725,000 in TOTAL compensation annually (2000 working hours). By contrast, Michael Duke took home over 18 MILLION last year--well over 20 times that amount.

    Currently, the only "system" which maintains the 50x rule is the US government (at least theoretically), as the President's compensation is well below $725,000...even including his allowances.

    Sorry if i'm ranting here, but to me these types of problems are very, very simple if we just eliminated the BS regulation and went with 50x. Max CEO pay on a grunt pay of 50k is 2.5 million annually. It's simple math, and there's relatively nothing left to quibble over. Superfluous funds either go towards employee benefits, infrastructure, or dividends.

    /rant

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering