Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 58

Thread: What the hell am I doing wrong!!! Chrome Tuning

  1. #11
    Never finishes any verified

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    2,518
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 197 Times in 140 Posts
    Well good to know I was not going crazy...lol See what following directions gets me.

    Going to try and do some more tuning after I get back from the family gathering tonight.

    Check it out on Youtube!!


    93 Stealth TT - The Stealth Project

    Renegade Tech Works ECS Controller on Intrax Springs
    Chrome ECU
    Hybrid 13g's
    EVO 560cc Injectors
    Spec Stage 3 clutch
    Ninja Performance Output shaft & Input spool
    Ninja Performance Solid Tensioner & Gates racing T-Belt
    CX Racing Dual Core FMIC
    Megan SS Exhaust
    Fidanza Cam Gears and Clear Covers
    3rd Gen Lifters
    HKS BOV
    K&N FIPK
    Maximal High flow converter
    Walbro FP & FuelLab FPR
    Maximal and Seattle Solid Mounts
    All -6an Lines
    Custom -6AN coolant neck lines
    AWS/ABS/Cruise Delete
    MP Rear Control Arms
    SS Brake Lines
    99 Front Conversion
    2nd gen Rear Bumper
    99 Combat Wing
    Complete interior LED Swap
    Skillard Fuel channel
    Oohnoo FPR Bracket
    .
    .
    More to Come......

  2. #12
    Never finishes any verified

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    2,518
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 197 Times in 140 Posts
    So I'm finally starting to get somewhere. Getting close to getting the low trims dialed in perfect. I had to use a combination of injector scaling and VE table adjustments. Setting the injectors to 590 alone was not going to cut it. After increasing the VE 0-100 an additional +20 it was still not getting the low trims to budge from 12.5. So I started slowly lowering the injector scaling down to a point they started to move the trims. dropped the scaling -20cc, flashed, let it run for 20 min and monitored. Rinse and repeat.

    I now have the trims within a range that I feel comfortable adjusting the VE table without going way out on the adjustments. Injectors are scaled down to 501cc and the trims are FLFTM: 6 and RLFT: 2. So now I can go in and fine tune with the VE table. Not sure why I needed to drop the injectors down 90cc's to get the idle fuel I need, But my intent was to get close on the injector scaling so that when I tune Mid and Open later on my adjustments should be fairly minor. I didn't want to make massive adjustments to the low VE portion to find out I am Stupid Lean in the mid and boost ranges. At Least now I should be rich which is safer than running stupid lean.

  3. #13
    Forum User
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Owner Since
    2007

    Location
    Sundsvall, Sweden
    Posts
    928
    Thanks
    330
    Thanked 119 Times in 77 Posts
    If you have to enter smaller size for you injector I would double check the fuel pressure. I noticed when I changed FPR that even the smallest change in fuel pressure has a quite big effect on the fuel trims.

    I think I'm using an injector size of 580 in Chrome for my evo 560 injectors. Also make sure that you are using the correct latency value because there are two types of evo 560 injectors and they use different latencies (these is a whole thread about on this forum).

    Fuel pressure, injector size, ve table and injector latency all affect the low trims quite a lot so try to minimize the unknowns.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Unlogic For This Useful Post:


  5. #14
    Never finishes any verified

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    2,518
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 197 Times in 140 Posts
    Fuel pressure is right on at 43.5 psi. Latencies I am using were provided by Forest I think in another thread I had open.

    Latency Values:
    6.01 - 1.905
    7.89 - 1.695
    10.03 - 1.215
    12.01 - 0.930
    13.99 - 0.750
    15.97 - 0.630
    16.99 - 0.570


    So It looks to be as tuned is as I'm going to get it.

    FLTFT: +3.1
    RLTFT: -1.3
    WBO2: 16.4

    This is all at idle with the engine running for the last hour now in the garage. Now I'll start driving it around to get logs for the Mid trims and verify the Low trims are steady.

  6. #15
    JNS Engineering verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    1994

    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,112
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked 155 Times in 110 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DrGonzo View Post
    Fuel pressure is right on at 43.5 psi. Latencies I am using were provided by Forest I think in another thread I had open.

    Latency Values:
    6.01 - 1.905
    7.89 - 1.695
    10.03 - 1.215
    12.01 - 0.930
    13.99 - 0.750
    15.97 - 0.630
    16.99 - 0.570


    So It looks to be as tuned is as I'm going to get it.

    FLTFT: +3.1
    RLTFT: -1.3
    WBO2: 16.4

    This is all at idle with the engine running for the last hour now in the garage. Now I'll start driving it around to get logs for the Mid trims and verify the Low trims are steady.
    Ran into your thread again and I see you appear to have the low trims dialed in here however your wideband should be much closer to 14.7. You might want to check your WB calibration

    Mod list (scroll down the page)
    JNS Engineering has your Spyders covered (and uncovered too!!)

  7. #16
    Never finishes any verified

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    2,518
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 197 Times in 140 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimvr4 View Post
    Ran into your thread again and I see you appear to have the low trims dialed in here however your wideband should be much closer to 14.7. You might want to check your WB calibration
    This is at complete idle sitting in the garage with zero load. 16 AFR is right where I want it to be. 14.7 at dead stop idle is way too rich. there is no load on the engine so it can easily run 16+ afr at idle without issues. 14.7 is what you would tune a cruising idle at.

  8. #17
    Forum User Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Medford OR
    Posts
    1,420
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 602 Times in 302 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DrGonzo View Post
    This is at complete idle sitting in the garage with zero load. 16 AFR is right where I want it to be. 14.7 at dead stop idle is way too rich. there is no load on the engine so it can easily run 16+ afr at idle without issues. 14.7 is what you would tune a cruising idle at.
    I can see that being true, but just to clarify the point, you did specifically target that lean mix under those driving conditions..? Because the factory calibration does not, hense Jim's concern...


    Real Performance Automotive (541)816-4500 www.FB.com/RealPerformanceAuto

  9. #18
    Never finishes any verified

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    2,518
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 197 Times in 140 Posts
    There are no driving conditions tuned at this point. This was just setting the base idle AFR to get the injectors scaled into a median point that i can tune the rest of the ranges appropriately. Once driving there will be load on the engine and the AFR will be completely different. I'll be tuning cruising idle from about 15-15.5 AFR like I always have. it gives the best MPG out of the engine.

  10. #19
    Forum User Not Verified

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2004

    Location
    Cape Girardeau
    Posts
    4,791
    Thanks
    365
    Thanked 296 Times in 214 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DrGonzo View Post
    There are no driving conditions tuned at this point. This was just setting the base idle AFR to get the injectors scaled into a median point that i can tune the rest of the ranges appropriately. Once driving there will be load on the engine and the AFR will be completely different. I'll be tuning cruising idle from about 15-15.5 AFR like I always have. it gives the best MPG out of the engine.
    I guess you are going to leave closed loop disabled?

    Parting 6 speed
    Pampena 3.5 Stroker, GTX 2867 Gen IIs, AEM Series2, oohnoo SMIC, DN Hardpipes, FIC 1650s, Walbro 525, aermotive fpr, Dejon intake pipes, Tial Q, Koyo Rad, Samco Hoses, Stoptech 332mm fronts, HKS GT4 Coilovers, Spec 4+ LW, JDM 6 Speed, Billet shift forks, Pampena brace

  11. #20
    Never finishes any verified

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    2001

    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    2,518
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 197 Times in 140 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Forest Gump View Post
    I guess you are going to leave closed loop disabled?
    Why do you say that?

    and no closed loop is not disabled.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering