Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: 3S gearing, I'm shocked!

  1. #1

    3S gearing, I'm shocked!

    Hey all,
    While I have enjoyed an '88 Conquest TSi 5-speed, a '95 Probe GT 5-speed, and an '85 300ZX 5-speed, I'm mostly a Camaro / Firebird guy, except for a few Mustangs.
    I did a carbureted 5.7L '78 Camaro that managed 25.1 MPG at 65 MPH with the ignition advance being way late. I used a 700R-4 automatic, and was geared for 1800 RPM. A year later, I drove a second-gen Eclipse 4-cylinder, which, to my extreme amazement, would also cruise along at 65 MPG doing just 1800 RPM! Great!
    Just now, unable to sleep, I looked up all the gearing options ever used on any / every version of these cars. Very sad. The best possibility is the 6-speed, which is 1940 at 65! Can any of these cars even see 25 MPG? And my automatic, ( which is geared identically to '90s Cummins-powered Rams ), is 2300 at 65! Even then, it doesn't have enough first gear, even with the 3.958:1 final. We get a 10.1:1 first, when I know from experience that an 11.4:1 is great for a similar-weight, same-tire-diameter '88 IROC-Z 5.7L with a shorter-runner intake manifold.
    I can see I'll need to do a 6-speed swap to like this car. Yet having done the whole Fiero thing, I'm thinking of the F40-MT2, ( not Ferrari ) which would require custom axles, flipping the engine around 180*( or outright swapping a GM V6, in my case ) and would give a cruise RPM of 1870. Plus the trans itself can be had new for under $1,000 delivered, and has proven strong enough for 500 HP V8 swaps. Ratios are 3.7692 / 2.0400 / 1.3208 / 0.9538 / 0.7547 / 0.6208 with a 3.5455:1 final.
    Last edited by foreveralone; 05-08-2012 at 08:13 AM.

  2. #2
    Administrator Alan92RTTT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Owner Since
    02/1998

    Location
    Madison Heights, Mi
    Posts
    2,958
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 675 Times in 255 Posts
    I get 27 on the highway with my TT and my SL while running 80 with no issue.

  3. #3
    My VR4 gets 25mpg easily on the highway.

  4. #4
    Monogamous Gigolo verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    October 2009

    Location
    Ithaca, Mi.
    Posts
    2,755
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    605
    Thanked 190 Times in 131 Posts
    I figged about 26MPG average driving. And that is just doing the math with one tank of gas, no average.

  5. #5
    Forum User verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    August 2003

    Location
    Uniontown
    Posts
    467
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
    I've gotten 25 on my TT. And a record of 32 with a tail wind going cross country. That's with 370hp at the wheels.

  6. #6
    OG Member verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Owner Since
    2003

    Location
    Elkhart, TX
    Posts
    277
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    66
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    My 700+hp 3/s build (last one) averaged over 30mpg on the highway, of course under load it was gallons per mile...but every highway trip was consistantly 30+mpg.

    My E-85 stealth so far is getting 17mpg city/flogging on it. Ill see how the mileage actually is when I am done tuning. Anticipating 17 city/24 highway on E-85.

  7. #7
    Administrator Alan92RTTT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Owner Since
    02/1998

    Location
    Madison Heights, Mi
    Posts
    2,958
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 675 Times in 255 Posts
    Is 17/24 good for mileage on E85?

  8. #8
    OG Member verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Owner Since
    2003

    Location
    Elkhart, TX
    Posts
    277
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    66
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan92RTTT View Post
    Is 17/24 good for mileage on E85?
    I would anticipate so as E-85 has less energy than pump fuel. Most vehicles average 5-30% less fuel economy on E-85 than pump. If I can achieve 17 city/24 highway it is cost effective for me as the price per gallon is 15-25% cheaper. Only problem is the car is currently on an E-70 blend and E-85 will be less fuel efficient due to the higher ethanol content.

    Oh well, it is still cheap "race gas". Being able to run "all boost" on the 9b's is nice.

  9. #9
    Forum User Not Verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since

    Posts
    561
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
    I get 21.5MPG, but I have 2 dying cylinders, so that probably explains my perdicament.
    Recertified ASE L1/L3 Master Technician
    13G's on Pump 93 tuned to 421awhp/419awtq @ 17psi tuned by Pampena Motorsports ....375awtq at 2900rpm....
    Billet 19T HL's on E85 tuned to .....?

  10. #10
    Member verified
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Owner Since
    Oct '08 - Oct '10

    Location
    Royersford, PA
    Posts
    3,814
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,059
    Thanked 442 Times in 317 Posts
    28mpg through the hills of PA all day long. 17mpg around town haha.
    R135
    ╚╬╬╝
    - 24

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The 3000GT/Stealth/GTO Web History Project
3000gt.com
3000GT / Stealth International WWWboard Archive
Jim's (RED3KGT) Reststop
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Information and Resources
Team 3S
3000GT / Stealth / GTO Information
daveblack.net
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Clubs and Groups
Michigan 3S
MInnesota 3S
Wisconsin 3S
Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas 3S
North California 3000GT/Stealth
United Society of 3S Owners
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Forums
3000GT/Stealth International
3000GT/Stealth/GTO Event Pages
3S National Gathering
East Coast Gathering
Upper Mid-West Gathering
Blue Ridge Gathering