Originally Posted by
Memphetic
Nothing wrong with turned cranks as far as I (and Ray Pampena) am concerned. Every 6G72 3.5 stroker he has built was with a 3.5 Diamante crankshaft turned to stock journal 6G72 pin diameter. People will complain about the loss of nitriding - which is just a SURFACE hardener and has nothing to do with the ability of the crank to withstand stress. You can't honestly believe that 49.75mm vs 50mm will make a difference in strength - it's only a .5% difference. The reason I bring this up is because a crankshaft for these things costs a *lot* of money.
As long as your machinist can maintain out-of-round less than 0.003 mm, and taper of less than .005 mm and you end up with an oil clearance of 0.020 - 0.050 mm. Also, ensure that the balls at the end of the journals (you will see them on the crankshaft) that are used to plug the line bored oil holes are drilled out and replaced with a tapped hex cap nut. These act like sludge traps. Either you can do it yourself by filing them flat, using a center punch, then drilling them out, or by having your machinist do it for you. If you intend to put the engine back together yourself, I have some tips for that as well, and can more or less walk you through the process. Let me know.
EDIT: That is, indeed, a N/A block. You can tell by the lack of braces on the main girdle. In addition, if you look into the block you won't find any oil squirters.
EDIT 2: Those slivers you pulled out are the thrust washers. They maintain an oil clearance between the crankshaft and the block laterally and prevent it from moving in and out. They're annoying to install, at best, and the first time I did it many years ago, I ended up crushing one. But yes, they just sit in there (that's what makes them hard to install - they're going to want to fall)