http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrMOBKHqqc8
Printable View
I hope Microsoft fires you soon.
mike is as close to astroturfer as you can get without being paid.
LOL that is awesome
IE Sucks..... And Always Will!!
I seriously think all the IE hate is just computer geek bandwagoning. As a computer layman, I really do not have a problem with it. In fact, I went back to it because I couldn't stand Firefox after trying it for a week...never used Chrome though.
http://cache0.bigcartel.com/product_...21/knowing.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by bluefox1081
12 reasons not to use Internet Explorer, ever | Computerworld Blogs
When you're on the web development side of the fence and witness first-hand exactly how IE is messing it up for everyone, especially the laymen, you'll understand why there's so much hate out there for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by bluefox1081
For most people just looking to browse the web, it certainly gets the job done -- but it does not do it particularly well.
I do web development and I prefer IE over Chrome. For serious application development Chrome has no regard for breaking changes.
The only developers that prefer IE are those that develop in .Net/ASP since it was built around the same framework as IE it tends to work well.
Anyone who codes in standard compliance has to work in hacks to get their pages/designs to work in IE browsers.
Microsoft ignores standards and tries to create their own. The only reason IE has such a large percent of the market is due to consumer ignorance. IE comes pre-packaged with all Windows installs and has been since day one. This was a psychological effect that most people refer to the internet as the "E" icon and don't see it as just a program. They don't realize they have other options out there. they just assume that IE is how they connect to the internet. Same effect happened years ago when Dial up was the only means. Most people associated the "AOL" icon with connecting to the internet.
Over the years people are becoming more aware of the other options out there besides IE and are becoming aware of all of the issues associated with IE. IE has been slowly loosing market share and will continue to until they understand that they need to follow compliance standards and fix all of the security holes they introduce in a timely matter not on a schedule that leaves it users wide open.
The main reason not to use IE is the fact that it is the number one targeted browser for spyware,viruses, trojans, etc. Hackers know they have a better chance of breaking into your system when it is the mostly used browser.
ITT: news from 2002?
I could write a book if I documented all of the jQuery/Javascript things that break in IE. We support FF, Chrome, Safari and IE8 >. I'd bet that at least 25% of our total dev time is spent "fixing" things to work in IE.Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest Gump
I could write the bible on forced automatic updates in chrome that break the way files are transferred or other actual functionality.
Your chat box is pretty broken in all the browsers, so I'm not sure how standards compliance is working out for you.
Let me expand on this. The problem is standards compliance guys live in a fantasy land where every website is rewritten as standards are updated. I'm sorry, but that is not remotely feasible. Browsers of all brands should do a better job at backwards compatibility.
Try to print shipping labels with paypal's multi order shipping for example. Good luck finding a browser combo that works 100% of the time and doesn't throw 99 warnings. I'm sure you guys will throw stones at paypal, but this time of behavior is MUCH more prevalent than you will admit.
The problem with security by just being a minority browser or operating system is that if you do well suddenly you are the target. The macs are at the leading edge of this.Quote:
Originally Posted by DrGonzo
I find it slightly offensive that you would insist that asp.net sites cannot be written to standards compliance. I am not sure why you would say that as in the end it is all html/css and javascript to the browser.
I did not write the chatbox :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Forest Gump
I think you missed Dr Gonzo's point on security. Its not that .net apps are less secure. Historically IE itself has more security vulnerabilities that the other browsers. When you add that to being the browser with the largest install base IE has a huge red target painted on it. Hackers will look for issues in IE because when they find one they have a huge target audience. If you want your system to be secure a good start is to not use the browser everyone is trying to hack.
Of course what you are saying about being popular is true and of course the browser will have more security holes because it is the most tied to the OS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan92RTTT
Personally ever single time of I have picked up Malware has been while using Firefox, but personal stories don't really matter.
Certainly there have been security improvements on virtually all accounts over the last few years and I have no doubt the walled garden approach that Windows 8 is bringing is going to help a lot.
The issue with developing websites is not really about security tho. MS/IE have decided to not follow standards in their implementation of javascript. Its one thing if its a feature nobody has and they roll their own version but if all the other browsers do it one way MS needs to stop being different. All the browsers have "issues" but they are normally in the form of bugs or things broken to fix security issues. MS seems to actively go out of their way just to be different.
And don't get me started on Win8 and the metro UI....
Not meaning to imply that .Net/ASP cannot be built compliant. The little I have used that platform I have found that it is geared toward using IE's same principles. Not saying that you couldn't code it to be compliant.
As for Malware through Firefox, it most likely came through some type of Advertisement on a page that you went to. Hackers target Ad Networks to server up their malicious code as they find it easier to deliver then tried to hack security holes. Delivering malicious code through an online advertisement is the easiest way to get into someones computer. One of the biggest reasons I believe in AdBlock. Granted I do searve ads on the sites I run, but I use Google Adsense which has good methods for containing infected advertisements and they have trusted ad networks.
IE's biggest security hole is it's Active-X framework which allows direct interaction with the operating System. Until Microsoft rethinks/re-engineers that framework, there will always be security holes and bugs.
Just to be clear. I am not against Microsoft. I worked for Microsoft for many years as an engineer for the Advertising and Publisher solutions section. I worked with malicious code, trojans, viruses etc on a daily bases being served directly through IE and through online Advertising. So I have the knowledge to share. I can only share my experience and personal interactions with what I used to do for a living. The decisions still lies in the end user.
I do not like ActiveX. On the other hand I hate Java. It is not that you can't do a lot with it, it is that no matter how fast you computer is Java has a very common habit of hanging the browser while it decides to load.
It seems to be that Microsoft is going to eliminate ActiveX:
Is IE 10 Going to Kill ActiveX? (No, but
The difference between Microsoft and others is typically Microsoft doesn't overnight end support for things people have come to depend on in their business operations. They can't eliminate ActiveX right now because there are too many users that depend on it.
you should probably just stop talking right now. go back to playing with your smartphone and pictures of LOL-Cats.Quote:
Originally Posted by bluefox1081
Sorry for upsetting the almightly internet gods, I will forever bow down to their flannel shirts, thick-framed eyeglasses and unkempt facial hair...and I don't have a smartphone.Quote:
Originally Posted by IPD
i like your ninja edit.Quote:
Originally Posted by bluefox1081
what you said earlier is something I can agree with. As soon as it is cool to hate something you'll have 99% of everyone get on the bandwagon even if they personally couldn't tell the difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by bluefox1081
I dislike IE because it's slow as hell when I switch tabs. That said, IE does load up a LOT faster than Firefox when they both have saved sessions. Once they're running though, IE is painfully slow in comparison.
CHROME.
/thread
sucksQuote:
Originally Posted by sketch
chrome thread sucks?
Chrome sucks.
Cmon guys - a blanket "xxxx" sucks - is a bit simplistic isn't it. That would be like saying Corvette's suck - when all your basing it on is only one model year - well maybe Corvette's aren't a good example... I kid..kid...
From a personal level - I've got three browsers currently installed - for a while several versions back I stopped using Firefox and switched over to Chrome because FF performance when to crap... I'm back to firefox now since they fixed.
From a professional level , specifically referring to IE - our product group at O r a c l e is constantly asking for waivers against having to support IE8 because it is crap, but the corporate standards group says must be supported. IE9 - not a big deal and is solid for our products. Chrome check. FireFox - same deal (for most recent versions).
and just to foster the discussion about the different versions:
http://renegadetechworks.com/images/...arketshare.jpg
duke
not this shit again. I can find as many studies that say internet explorer dominates the marketshare as I can any other browser.
Market Share was not the point of my post..... the point I was trying to make was that there are many different (and older) versions of any given browser technology in use in the market at the same time. If the top part of that graph bothers you so much I'll be glad to remove it.Quote:
not this shit again
Duke
notice how FF has ONE version though.
it may be a memory hog at times, but the interface is much friendlier, the plug-ins more versatile, and the overall experience better. i didn't get that from chrome the last time i tried it--and I.E. has sucked since at least 6, imho.
I will use IE9 over FF any day.
I use both Chrome and IE9 at work.
Post via Tapatalk
So which IE version comes with a spell checker built in.... None of them!!!
FF and Chrome have had it built in since day one!
/Discussion
For a dev standpoint IE9 is not that bad. Its closer to standards than any prior version. IMO its dev tools are still subpar. Both FF and chrome provide better feedback to whats going on and how something is being interpreted than IE does.
Between Chrome and FF I give firebug in FF the edge as far as dev tools but they are close.
IE8 and older version are the real problem and it just needs to go away. MS's decision to leave older OS's on older version of the browser is really a very anti-consumer move. I don't think its right to just abandon them on older buggier versions.
FF has TOR. idk if chrome does, but i don't care. FF had it first. chrome has to convince me to give up all my wonderful gadgets with even better, more wonderful gadgets if it wants me to switch.
ie 10 works greatQuote:
Originally Posted by DrGonzo
I suppose going back to the original post, at least Microsoft isn't trying to kid itself. It's not the greatest browser in the world, and I'd have a difficult time arguing that IE hasn't made some progress. :p Baby steps.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan92RTTT
So spell check decides which browser is best?Quote:
Originally Posted by DrGonzo
Chrome sucks the big one. I downloaded it at work trying to solve an issue I was having only to find out it wasn't browser related anyway. I tried it, and hated it. I'll stick to IE. It does what I need it to and doesn't cause me any issues.