So who wants their ECU's "Chromed"?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greg E

With Toni's car there was a little bit of a difference over the MAFT/SAFC combo in terms of peak power. BUT there was a huge difference in midrange! Almost 40hp!

---

Yup, and it feels awesome on the street! Once I get the data from the dyno I'll post up a thread with my results, thoughts, etc. It'l be nice to show a side by side especially using the same dyno and all the crap I log lol.

So after a couple days of testing I feel comfortable releasing my Evoscan to Logworks log file converter.

evoscan2logworks - Convert Evoscan logs to Logworks logs - Google Project Hosting

Check it out and see what you think. It is beta so it's currently not tolerate of many things but a standard 2.6 evoscan logfile will work fine and the output will work in Logworks. I'm obviously not a vb(yuck) developer but it was quick, works, and needs nothing extra to be installed (I think).

Let me know if you have any troubles!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toni

So after a couple days of testing I feel comfortable releasing my Evoscan to Logworks log file converter.

evoscan2logworks - Convert Evoscan logs to Logworks logs - Google Project Hosting

Check it out and see what you think. It is beta so it's currently not tolerate of many things but a standard 2.6 evoscan logfile will work fine and the output will work in Logworks. I'm obviously not a vb(yuck) developer but it was quick, works, and needs nothing extra to be installed (I think).

Let me know if you have any troubles!

---

Is this what you were showing me at NG?

Attachment 4271

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toni

So after a couple days of testing I feel comfortable releasing my Evoscan to Logworks log file converter.

evoscan2logworks - Convert Evoscan logs to Logworks logs - Google Project Hosting

Check it out and see what you think. It is beta so it's currently not tolerate of many things but a standard 2.6 evoscan logfile will work fine and the output will work in Logworks. I'm obviously not a vb(yuck) developer but it was quick, works, and needs nothing extra to be installed (I think).

Let me know if you have any troubles!

---

I get this error when trying to run it.

Doh! I assume you are using vista or 7? The file selection dialog is apparently deprecated for security reasons :(

Uploaded a new version for windows vista/7 etc. It's a little wonky because it opens up the file selection in the background so you have to switch to it by alt-tabbing or selecting it in the taskbar. I'll see if I can fix that later. I'm glad I don't develop stuff for windows :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aaronatstate

Yes, thank you I understand how it works. I don't understand why I have to explain that I do know what the hell I'm talking about so many times.

I have a 91-92 car, that's the point. I have a 1g cam/crank setup, and I am using a 99 ECU, so I have to compensate for the latency differences in the maps, so I do not run to much timing. i.e. I want to run 20 degrees of timing at 7000rpm, I need to call for 16 degrees, that way after the latency differences, I actually do get 20. See I do know how it works, thanks.

---

aaronatstate:

I also have a 1G, and want to run this. So to compensate for the latency diff, run minus 4 across the board? What was your work around for no MAP sensor, just a simple boost guage correct? sorry, still on page 90.

^ Post 941 seems to have the right info.
Also Aaron posted the formula earlier. RPM x 0.0005 = , then subtract that number from the timing maps.

Not just 4 across the board fyi.

:disdain:

Guys, great work on the flashable ecu conversion. I have a '92 3000GT here in Australia that needs this conversion ! Any chance of rehosting the files ? i'm not sure they are working ? Cheers Mike