Originally Posted by
19Eclipse90
Maybe if you go looking for it. I didn't.
IMO, the movie is a big game of cat-and-mouse which is very entertaining and visually captivating. Any such underlying themes flew right by my radar. Compared to Mad Max 1-3, it felt a bit too Hollywood and I think I can understand why Tom Hardy felt as if he owed George Miller an apology once he saw the final product. Still, not a bad way to be reintroduced.
I know you mentioned this before, but you say it with such contempt for Jackson. I think he was really good in the role -- not that someone else couldn't do it just as well, but he wasn't out of place. I'm just curious, do you think Django Unchained would have been the same movie without Samuel L.?