you know where i stand on kalifornians, green cars, and dutch? :awesome:Quote:
Originally Posted by DuTTch
Printable View
you know where i stand on kalifornians, green cars, and dutch? :awesome:Quote:
Originally Posted by DuTTch
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/27/511...ecf_z.jpg?zz=1Quote:
Originally Posted by FeaRpb
So that's what he looks like??
Little known fact about Thadd:
He got thrown out at the plate 5 times in his last Little League baseball game.
His team lost by one run.
True story. :)
http://images.icanhascheezburger.com...0708473019.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Geeze, I hate doing this but... I'm pretty sure I know where IPD is coming from on the use if irregardless. Over the years, common use has made it acceptable, but not correct. Just like you will see the use of prolly for probably. Prolly is not a word, but given a few more years of use it will become one due to colloquialism. Those who are properly educated and have a grasp on the English language would neither use prolly for probably nor irregardless for regardless.Quote:
Originally Posted by tazman
Irregardless is not a word. I don't care what it says on Wikipedia. Irregardless would be a double negative, which is against the rules of English. What would it mean, anyway? "Without lack of regard?" That's redundant, and would leave you with Regard, which would make little or no sense in the context in which most people would use it. Irregardless. I feel unclean just typing it.
Wikipedia is user contributed, nothing scientific about it.
Either: Regardless (without regard) or Regarding (with regard)
Just so. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbo Beast