Post a recent picture of your car

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TT4ME

Car got more low. (it is the right car in signature.)
http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/b...132350_250.jpg

---

Finally! Nice!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IPD

Seriously, I wish I had a good pic of my car with 285's on it from a good angle. Fender-flush is one thing, but 1-2" of meat hanging out both sides really looks intimidating.

---

285s are actually what I was thinking. They are 17x9 +43 I believe so I don't think they will be hanging out.

Might be a little fat on the wheel, but should be pretty flush

Bill has some 285s that fit quite nicely, if i do say so myself :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IPD

Seriously, I wish I had a good pic of my car with 285's on it from a good angle. Fender-flush is one thing, but 1-2" of meat hanging out both sides really looks really stupid.

---

Fixed that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boosted3s

Not much of a story. It's his 3rd one, 1st 240z though and he's trying to make the best of it. Getting it looking it decent decent then dropping a VKturbo in it.

---

Hopefully he keeps that ride height :p

I like the look of some meaty sidewalls but wouldn't want a lot of poke. Don't know I'd go much past a 265 with my P45s, but they already have some poke up front as is.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

Look at the nuts sig, they are 285's though hard to see poke.

I don't have any input to this discussion.

Haters.

FTR, 18x10+24 was based on Dennis' recommendation. So once again, F**k GT-Pro. If GT-C's were still available, I'd be looking to run 19x9.5+35 with the same width tire.

Furthermore, if anyone made fender flares worth a damn, "poke" wouldn't even be an issue.