Mine too. ~400 crank hp at 14.5psi on 13t's according to the mass flow rate of the engine. Tuning by mass is so much nicer than tuning by "load."
Printable View
Mine too. ~400 crank hp at 14.5psi on 13t's according to the mass flow rate of the engine. Tuning by mass is so much nicer than tuning by "load."
I remember the hearty laugh we had when we first tried it out in Indy. "chromed" flash, win.
Is anyone running speed density on a 98/99 ecu yet?
I actually inquired about that already hehe.
A lil somethin' has been sent :mitsu:
Now I just need to get an ECU and adapter harness. :)
Good times! Hook your stock BCS back up and we can have some more fun!Quote:
Originally Posted by The Linchpin
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by vr4tune
...but you can run a MAFT or an ARC2 just like on any car. Flash the ecu with your new injector size and use the piggy back unit as a "translator". I'm going to experiment with the corrvette MAF in my car soon with the MAfT box zeroed out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vr4tune
Well till then I'll stick with my aem ems. I still dream of the day though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg E
If you had an AEM then what would be the benifit of going to a flashed ECU. I assumed the AEM would be more versatile?
Basically I guess I'm asking what's better?
You can't pass OBD2 inspections with an AEM.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gearheadvr4
The motor starts and run like stock with any fuel injectors. ;)
Cheaper.
Easier to tune...
Lots of advantages. Soon I'll figure out how to manipulate the code to have all the same functionalities as an AEM too. Just need time.