Let's look at M$ product
95 <-from what I remember, shitty
98 <-I used it forever
ME <-Shitty
XP <-I used it forever
Vista <-Shitty
7 <-I will probably use forever
They always need a stepping stone to get things 'right'
Printable View
Let's look at M$ product
95 <-from what I remember, shitty
98 <-I used it forever
ME <-Shitty
XP <-I used it forever
Vista <-Shitty
7 <-I will probably use forever
They always need a stepping stone to get things 'right'
Pretty much. It annoys me that Microsoft thought that 7 was already dated. Who do they think is going to use this? Certainly not business users. This looks like something meant for a tablet, not a real computer for getting shit done. You can't get anything productive done on that. What a crap UI and they're proud of it. It's funny how MS can make a great OS, but they consistently make a crap one in between and then have to fix it with the next release. Nothing like doing it twice.
Thanks for wasting my time MS.
Hahaha, exactly!!
windows 8 is really just the interface addon... it should be called Windows 7 (touch edition)..
I want it on a laptop(touch screen).
Everybody knows you skip every other Windows. Its retarded but its the truth. Windows ME was solid...
Well...looks like Neutrino may be my next OS...
3.1 i used for a while too. 95 wasn't nearly as bad as some of the others on the list. it did have growing pains at first, but after the first year or so, 95 > 3.1 by a mile. of course when 98 came out, 95 was dogshit; although i never got as many blue-screens-of-death with 95 as i did with 98.
i like to think of vista as "windows 7 beta". just like unreal 2k3 was "unreal 2k4 beta". :D
i doubt i'll upgrade at all. i'll stick with 7 until i have to buy a new pc. it's not like i'll lose the ability to play games due to my OS at any point in the next 7-10 years.
yeah 95 was fairly solid, it certainly was no vista or me