The words in bold are just false. Sheen though nuts, has had a good movie career. Where as Kutcher has had a lack luster big screen career so far.
Printable View
So are they killing off Sheen's character or something? Keeping the other 2 guys (well guy and the kid)? Be interesting to see how they try to pull that off.
That's what I was thinking as the most probable storyline. Maybe try and make Kutcher Sheen's long lost illegitimate son that inherits everything.
I'm with Paul, I'll watch the first one to see what it's all about, but I can't imagine having much interest in the long run.
Jeremy
You're kidding right? Besides Platoon and Wall Street (which Sheen was NOT the character that made the movie in either of those) what has he done? A bunch of low grade comedy movies that never grossed much, that's what. Major League was probably his next biggest film. The Wraith? Hot Shots? Scary Movie 3,4... Come on.
Ashton on the other hand has been in a lot more commercially successful films, while producing quite a few popular things too.
Ashton has only been in one good thing that was ever successful, That 70's Show. Okay, maybe Dude Where's My Car?
Who I find a better actor?
Sheen > Ashton
Eh, every time I've seen 2 and a half men it's made me laugh. If I trip over it in the future I'll give it a shot.
And Sheen >> Ashton
I can't see the show working with a replacement character. IMO its the brother dynamic that makes the show work.
I love Two and a Half Men. Makes me laugh every time I watch.
It's just not going to be the same without Charlie.