There's something fishy about this car

Depends on the Ferrari :p

i'm trying to read the VIN and it looks like JA3AM44H5VY003118, but nothing comes up for this on the 3S storyteller. tried substituting A and 4 in the middle, still nothing.

they're right, though. that is one extreme deal.
/s

thats how they roll in Nigeria

Used car salesman are sooooooo funny! (but they dont know it!!)

-SP

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TwIzTeD_3kGt

Well if those are your high performance standards, the NA 6G72 should fit just fine. Those F-body's only ran 14's at best with those 400+ cu.in. engines in stock form, and weighed more than a VR4. The smaller 350 and 396's were even slower. I'd bet the NA 3S would do better round a track, and in some cases, go faster down the quarter mile than most of those.

Granted I wasn't around in that time so feel free to correct my Google research.

---

The big difference was a person could spend a few hundred dollars and make one of these a 10 second car. The NA 3s is already maxed out not much room for improvement unless one goes turbo. I have driven both. Those old cars had lots of untaped performance in them which could be found cheap.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sketch

i'm trying to read the VIN and it looks like JA3AM44H5VY003118, but nothing comes up for this on the 3S storyteller. tried substituting A and 4 in the middle, still nothing.

they're right, though. that is one extreme deal.
/s

---

Try: JA3AM44H4VY003118

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 2fnloud

Try: JA3AM44H4VY003118

---

d'oh typos!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speedy25

Used car salesman are sooooooo funny! (but they dont know it!!)

-SP

---

hey! im a car salesman! ;) be nice! haha