Bob already posted a thread with all the Dyno results. I was wondering if we could compile the rankings for AutoX with the class breakdowns. I may be premature making this thread but I'm excited to know the standings!
Printable View
Bob already posted a thread with all the Dyno results. I was wondering if we could compile the rankings for AutoX with the class breakdowns. I may be premature making this thread but I'm excited to know the standings!
Alan or Bob will publish the info, it will just take a little while.Quote:
Originally Posted by Uniuno
The info will be available shortly after I get home. I got the data uploaded but the page is broken.
Thanks Alan! Would you mind listing the Class specs? I forget the differences between some of the classes.
What was up with car #118?Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan92RTTT
Dan registered on site so the data in the registration system is wrong. IIRC he was class 2. Just one a few things I need to fix on that page.
Okay, thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan92RTTT
I'd like to request that you guys reconsider the classes for next year's autocross. Putting TT cars with stock suspensions in the same class with NA cars with modified suspensions, and then designing a course with at least 2 significant straight sections, puts the NA cars at a huge disadvantage. If the course is going to be tight, with a lot of turns and no long straight sections, then fine, an NA with a racing suspension will be able to hold his own against a stock TT, but once you give a TT a chance to use his accelerating advantage, the playing field is no longer level.
These cars are old, and racing them causes a lot of abuse to their 20+ year old suspension components. If I had known I would have to beat TT cars in autocross, I wouldn't have bothered to even run. Better to save the wear and tear on the car than to run it hard with no chance of winning.