View Full Version : I was a bit shocked...
...not by the title of the article, nor by Raquel Welch who, at 71, placed second on a list of the hottest women of all-time, but the first-place finisher is kind of a...well...I mean, really?
Are you shitting me?
You have to be - I mean, I'd have give the matter some serious thought in order to give you my Top-10 number ones, if you know what I mean, but...really? Seriously?
Raquel Welch: Americans Are 'all Sex Addicts' Living In An 'era Of Porn' | Fox News (http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/03/12/raquel-welch-americans-are-all-sex-addicts-living-in-era-porn/?intcmp=features)
AgentOblivious
03-12-2012, 11:07 PM
I had a teacher who was a dead look-alike. Wouldn't put her on the top of my top 10 list either. Raquel's point is somewhat valid.
I had a teacher who was a dead look-alike. Wouldn't put her on the top of my top 10 list either. Raquel's point is somewhat valid.
Look-alike for J.A.?
bluefox1081
03-13-2012, 11:17 AM
Jennifer Aniston is the hottest woman of all time? Seriously, just off the top of my head without any kind of list I could go through, I doubt she would even be a consideration for my top 20.
And looking back through some old pics, I don't think Raquel Welch would either.
Jennifer Aniston is the hottest woman of all time? Seriously, just off the top of my head without any kind of list I could go through, I doubt she would even be a consideration for my top 20.
And looking back through some old pics, I don't think Raquel Welch would either.
Well, even given that it's down to individual taste, it's as we both are saying:
Jennifer Aniston???
I mean, while she is terminally cute, I cannot call her beautiful - she's not even in the discussion.
bluefox1081
03-13-2012, 02:15 PM
I think it's a combination of a few things.
1) She is attractive, no doubt.
2) These lists always seem to go by popularity, and Aniston is a current trend. (this is the major deciding factor, explained below).
3) She gets an extra pity vote because Pitt broke up with her to go after a woman who was perceived to be hotter at the time.
4) She gets another extra pity vote because she's now over 40.
As far as the popularity factor, I could open to a random page in any Victoria's Secret magazine from the past 15-20 years, and there would be a high probability any model from that page is someone I'd consider hotter than Aniston. The thing is, not many people know very many Victoria's Secret models by name.
I mean hell, they have Mila Kunis at #96, and I personally think she's one of the hottest women of at least this current generation...I'd surely put her far better on the list than Aniston. They even have Tina Turner on the list. I'm sure if someone gave me a list of all of the attractive celebrities of the past 100 years, Tina Turner wouldn't even make my top 500. And Audrey Hepburn all the way down at #82 and Paris Hilton at #46? wtf.
I buy all of that, except when the standard is "All-Time"; current trends and pity votes shouldn't be allowed.
HilbillyHomeboy
03-13-2012, 04:58 PM
Jennifer Aniston is beyond gorgeous, IMO. #1 of all time? Yeah, I'm not going that far. The same could be said for Raquel Welch.
It's just a silly list put together by a couple dorks at a magazine. This type of competition can never have a true concensus. Tis why everyone isn't dating the same person; we all have different tastes.
Jeremy
Jennifer Aniston is beyond gorgeous, IMO. #1 of all time? Yeah, I'm not going that far. The same could be said for Raquel Welch.
It's just a silly list put together by a couple dorks at a magazine. This type of competition can never have a true concensus. Tis why everyone isn't dating the same person; we all have different tastes.
Jeremy
Point is, they didn't have proper respect for the question - not IMO, anyway.
HilbillyHomeboy
03-13-2012, 05:31 PM
Again, it's a contrived list made up by a bunch of kiddos at a magazine. What do you really expect?!
Looking at the list...Britney Spears at #4? That's a helluva bigger travesty than Aniston at #1. Good lord...what a freaking joke.
Farrah Fawcett clear down at #31? Sophia Loren at #47? Bo Derek at #56? Rita Hayworth at #58? Audrey Hepburn at #82?!?!?!?! Wow... It's pretty freaking clear what demographic the writers were after... :rolleyes:
However, the worst of all...Jenna Jameson being on the list, period. Absurd.
Jeremy
beepbeep
03-13-2012, 05:58 PM
Again, it's a contrived list made up by a bunch of kiddos at a magazine. What do you really expect?!
Looking at the list...Britney Spears at #4? That's a helluva bigger travesty than Aniston at #1. Good lord...what a freaking joke.
Farrah Fawcett clear down at #31? Sophia Loren at #47? Bo Derek at #56? Rita Hayworth at #58? Audrey Hepburn at #82?!?!?!?! Wow... It's pretty freaking clear what demographic the writers were after... :rolleyes:
However, the worst of all...Jenna Jameson being on the list, period. Absurd.
Jeremy
What he said.
93STLTH
03-13-2012, 06:06 PM
I agree Jenna Jameson shouldn't be on the list, but if you remember what she used to look like...
http://media.mademan.com/chickipedia/uploaded_photos/6/6e/Jenna_Jameson-eyes-soft-sexy-smoking-hot-young-chicki-stunning_thumb_585x795.jpg
I can see some people including her.
BaadVR4
03-14-2012, 11:58 AM
I suppose if I suggested we have become culturally defined by our sexuality (or lack thereof), I'd be ridiculed. Just sayin'.
I suppose if I suggested we have become culturally defined by our sexuality (or lack thereof), I'd be ridiculed. Just sayin'.
Oh, hell, Milt, I'd have my wife on the list, but this is just a sporting look at some popular icons, given we will never (ever, I swear) stray. :)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.