PDA

View Full Version : Narrowband O2 signal drop out - Chrome ECU v2



Dougal
12-28-2016, 02:57 AM
Hi All,

I'm hoping to get some insight into my o2 sensor signal dropping whenever i have more than idle or cruise load. (when TPS 15%+)
When the car goes into closed loop to target 14.7:1 AFR i can see the 02 signal cycling (between 0.07 volts and 0.8 volts) but as soon as I give any throttle the 02 sensor goes to zero with the occasional blip of a o2 signal (0.5 volts etc...)

As I understand when the car is run outside closed loop parameters it will switch to open loop and use the maps in the rom (fuel map, maf smoothing table VE ?)

I am running a Montero 482 MAF which is scaled in my rom (similar to EVO 399 scaling)
My car is only using 1 x Narrowband o2 sensor. I have set the peripheries in the rom to ignore the front o2 sensor and run just the rear o2.

I have been tuning fuel from the LTFT Low and Mid using the MAF Smoothing table (VE).

My concern is that my fueling way way off and zero in my logs means that its leaning out past the fuel MAP.
My STFT always jumps to +12.5 % addition of fuel whenever i apply load and come out of closed loop and into open loop.
I am unsure if the zeroing out of the NB o2 sensor is reflecting this or its something else related to my MAF or basic tune
My LTFT Low and Mid seem good at near zero (see below attached log)

I'm hoping someone here can shed some light on this.


Attached is an extract of one of my datalogs showing the o2 signal dropping out and a extract from evoscan showing the o2 cycling when idling.

9231
9227

Also attached is one of the notes in Evoscan regarding o2 sensor signals for high loads that are below 0.7 volts.
How could i test that this is actually an issue caused by MAF iteslf?

9228

The Montero 482 MAF scaling, size and adder im using.
9229

Is this just a matter of adding more fuel via the MAF smoothing table (VE) at the load area's (above 100hz) that is there the o2 is showing zero volts?

striker2
12-28-2016, 10:38 AM
30% TPS is not enough to go to open loop unless you are above 4000RPMs (there is a table in ECUFlash that shows the RPM vs TPS required for open loop), instead it is switching to the mid fuel trims at that point. Your fuel trim is maxing out is because your O2 sensor is dropping and the PCM thinks its wicked lean and needs to add a bunch of fuel. You could have a bad O2 sensor, bad wiring for the O2 sensor, or even an exhaust leak after the turbine but before the O2 sensor (can pull air into the exhaust system which causes a lean reading on the O2 sensor).

DrGonzo
12-28-2016, 01:05 PM
I have been battling this same issue, on two different cars using Chrome and have still not figured out why the 02's just drop out randomly. I replaced all sensors, checked for leaks, redid all wiring, etc and the issue still occurs. Happens on my 93 Stealth and a friends 96 3000gt. So don't feel like you're the only one it is happening to.

I get the same responses about it's the sensor, the wiring or a leak and none of those have resolved the issues with it dropping out randomly. I have my idle dialed in as best as I can but as soon as an 02 drops out it messes up the trims all over again. I'm pretty sure it is my rear that always drops out. May be the front. It is always one bank that does it.

striker2
12-28-2016, 07:11 PM
are either of you using actual 98/99 ECUs or are you both using clones (from whoever)?

DrGonzo
12-28-2016, 08:50 PM
Got mine directly from Jester. So whatever it is that he sells.

RealMcCoy
12-28-2016, 11:53 PM
Is your O2 sensor heater working?

Dougal
12-29-2016, 12:40 AM
are either of you using actual 98/99 ECUs or are you both using clones (from whoever)?

Jesters chrome ecu for GTO 91-97 is what i bought.

Dougal
12-29-2016, 12:44 AM
Is your O2 sensor heater working?

Yes

When installing the o2 sensor I tested the wiring to the o2 sensor.
I am using a Bosch replacement and wired in as per instructions from Jeff.L on Steath316 site.
http://www.stealth316.com/2-oxygensensor.htm

RealMcCoy
12-29-2016, 12:52 AM
Well my first thought was it was really going that lean, but according to your wideband it's going pig rich... If that's correct, it would indicate the narrowband is lying...

Dougal
12-29-2016, 12:52 AM
30% TPS is not enough to go to open loop unless you are above 4000RPMs (there is a table in ECUFlash that shows the RPM vs TPS required for open loop), instead it is switching to the mid fuel trims at that point. Your fuel trim is maxing out is because your O2 sensor is dropping and the PCM thinks its wicked lean and needs to add a bunch of fuel. You could have a bad O2 sensor, bad wiring for the O2 sensor, or even an exhaust leak after the turbine but before the O2 sensor (can pull air into the exhaust system which causes a lean reading on the O2 sensor).

Valid points.

Swapped 02 sensors as I have an extra Bosch sensor I bought for another car.

Wiring conditions are fine however it wont hurt to test resistance along the wiring to see if that affects things.

No exhaust leaks very certain of this.

I will do some looking at the wiring again

Dougal
12-29-2016, 01:29 AM
Well my first thought was it was really going that lean, but according to your wideband it's going pig rich... If that's correct, it would indicate the narrowband is lying...

Yes my wideband shows rich with 12 and 11 AFRs during accel.

This is what has me a bit confused, I have a feeling perhaps the MAF has something to do with this?

I dont have a working stock MAF as it was damaged beyond repair.
I got the 482 Montero MAF to use for when i had time to install the 19T's but I since ended up using it because the stock one was broken.

striker2
12-29-2016, 10:17 AM
Im wondering if there is an issue internally on some of the clone ECUs (like a bad solder joint or something) that is causing the rear O2 sensor to drop out occasionally. I say this only because I have never seen this happen with the multiple true 98/99 ECUs I have messed with and you both have Jester ECUs. I'm not saying this is definitely the case (I'm not even sure if the rear O2 sensor circuit is one that has to be modified) but if everything else checks out externally then I would be inclined to lean to an internal problem with the ECU.

The MAF probably doesnt have anything to do with this, but you can test it by unplugging the MAF and see if the O2 sensor still drops out (I'm betting it does).

RealMcCoy
12-29-2016, 11:42 AM
Yes my wideband shows rich with 12 and 11 AFRs during accel.

This is what has me a bit confused, I have a feeling perhaps the MAF has something to do with this?

I dont have a working stock MAF as it was damaged beyond repair.
I got the 482 Montero MAF to use for when i had time to install the 19T's but I since ended up using it because the stock one was broken.

The narrowband says it's lean, and the wideband says it's rich... One of them is wrong. The ECU believes the narrowband and reacts accordingly. The primary mystery you need to solve before you worry about any other tuning, is why two sensors in the same exhaust stream are reporting completely opposite conditions... Do you have a front O2 boss you could switch to and see if both banks behave the same?

Dougal
12-29-2016, 04:18 PM
The narrowband says it's lean, and the wideband says it's rich... One of them is wrong. The ECU believes the narrowband and reacts accordingly. The primary mystery you need to solve before you worry about any other tuning, is why two sensors in the same exhaust stream are reporting completely opposite conditions... Do you have a front O2 boss you could switch to and see if both banks behave the same?

I am pretty certain that the WB 02 is correct. Its an AEM UEGO.
However I can always plug the serial interface into my notebook and log to hyperterminal and see if the measurements are the same for what is through the wired ECU pin scaled in ECUFlash versus the Serial interface.
If its different then I know I have an issue with the WB 02 sensor or the scaling.

I do have provision for the front bank o2 as I am using a modified front exhaust pipe for an NA 3000gt.
The only issue is that I sits right next to the front engine mount leaving very very little room to actually install it.
Worth another look though as I could use the spare Bosch o2 sensor I have and run it to the ecu to see if there is any difference in signal quality.

A lot of sensors use the same ecu grounding. (MAF, TPS, Coolant temp, Narrowband o2)
Could the potential for readings being out of spec be related to this shared sensor ground back feeding into the signal wires of the sensors.

Is there a way around this where they can be divided so they are not sharing the same ground and potentially causing signal issues?

Thanks for everyone input.
This is really helping isolate the true cause of the issues. Hopefully helps other people with similar issues

Dougal
12-29-2016, 04:25 PM
Im wondering if there is an issue internally on some of the clone ECUs (like a bad solder joint or something) that is causing the rear O2 sensor to drop out occasionally. I say this only because I have never seen this happen with the multiple true 98/99 ECUs I have messed with and you both have Jester ECUs. I'm not saying this is definitely the case (I'm not even sure if the rear O2 sensor circuit is one that has to be modified) but if everything else checks out externally then I would be inclined to lean to an internal problem with the ECU.

The MAF probably doesnt have anything to do with this, but you can test it by unplugging the MAF and see if the O2 sensor still drops out (I'm betting it does).

I will run the car today and unplug the MAF and report back what happens.
If it does not drop out the o2 signal and shows a very rich o2 signal then that helps tell us that the car is simply running super lean and I could tune more fuel into the airflow load range (when MAF plugged in normal conditions).

Looks like I have some things to try.

Will report back ASAP

Dougal
12-29-2016, 10:24 PM
OK so i have been busy today at testing my o2 sensor stuff.

Started with a simple test of unplugging the MAF and seeing what happens to the o2 sensor signal.

From closed loop o2 cycling when the MAF is unplugged the o2 signal is steady and progressively get richer to a point (.60 volts)
Obviously STFT stops as the ecu knows the MAF is unplugged so its using a preset for MAF fault/Limp mode trim.

At idle its nice and rich but given any load then o2 sensor goes to zero.
obviously the absence of an airflow reading to the ecu.
9246

So based of the o2 sensor dropping out with the MAF unplugged and what i think is it behaving badly i went about adding a heap more fuel into my VE tables to see if i could raise the o2 sensor off zero when load applied.
I was a little aggressive in the addition of fuel requirements.
I guess i wanted to see how much fuel was needed to get my STFT trim to become a negative where the ecu would pull back fuel rather than always be adding fuel.

I am unable to drive this car to properly perform full load testing however for the purpose of the o2 test i figured stationary testing would suffice.

All up i think that either my setup with the Montero MAF requires me to modify the MAF Smoothing table quite a lot.
If its not that then i have a seriously MASSIVE intake leak (or injector issue?) that is completely screwing up my fueling.
Or a sensor ground wiring issue?

Here is what i did.
1. Increased addition of fuel via MAF smoothing VE table only the Idle airflow hz frequencies. (25,50 and 75 hz) and logged the results.
I did this three times for idle airflow range. (First with 104% then at 106% and then at 108%)
Noticed that by doing this my o2 sensor still cycled the same but my STFT got closer to zero
Eventually finding that it sat nearly on Zero STFT when idling.
See below extracts from Evoscan showing my o2 cycling and STFT graphed.


VE table comparison. Saved a new bin file each time i changed.
9238

First log of Idle closed loop o2 signal at 104% (25-75hz)
9239
2nd log of Idle closed loop o2 signal at 106% (25-75hz)
9240
3rd log if Idle closed loop o2 signal at 108% (25-75hz)
9241

See next post for other screen shots

Dougal
12-29-2016, 10:29 PM
2. Increased addition of fuel in MAF smoothing VE table for airflow load(100 hz to 200 hz)
I also did this twice for this airflow range. (First with 105% and 107% and then with 107% and 109%)

O2 sensor would still zero out at points when applied load.
No real clear reason that i can see based of the logs.
For no rhyme or reason it seems to drop out and WB shows lean at that point.
Sometimes it comes back and sometimes it does not.

Not nearly as much as it used to.
Also found that it would zero out more if it was a short burst of increased airflow where as if i progressively increased load it would show o2 signals still cycling
STFT trim was also not adding a heap of fuel into the mixture. Trims would stick around what they were whilst in closed loop.
Below shows all the screen shots of this also.

Were times on this that it still jumped to adding 12.5% fuel. Wideband was showing rich AFR at these points.

VE set at 105% and 107% for airflow range between 100hz and 200hz
9242

VE set at 107% and 109% for airflow range between 100hz and 200hz
9243

Datalog holding o2 signal
9244

Datalog dropping out o2 sensor signal.
9245


Does it seem correct that i would have to add this much fuel to the VE table to get the o2 sensor behaving a little better or am i just covering up a different problem with more fuel?

My trims seem to have adjusted better and my WB o2 seems to be showing correct AFR closer to what is in the fuel tables.

Thanks. Input from you guys is appreciated.

Dougal
12-30-2016, 04:59 PM
Been reading up on o2 sensor faults and diagnosis.

Going to pull the o2 sensor out of the exhaust and check to make sure its intact and that its not oil soaked.
Perhaps i have an oil leak from the turbos and its what is causing my o2 sensor drop out? (Dont have any odd colour exhaust fumes though)

Also going to check resistance of the sensor and then of the wiring back to the ECM.

Will check heater wire voltage also while im at it.

Im going to check logged voltage of the o2 versus voltage at the sensor wiring plug to also confirm what is coming from the sensor is what is read back at the ECM.

Might figure out whats happening by these tests. Hoping its something obvious but easy to fix.

Dougal
12-31-2016, 08:06 PM
Happy new year everyone!

Ok so good news is that the sensor is not oil soaked and the pipes are clean also.

Resistance on the wiring is within normal spec. (at most one of the wires was .07 ohms with the others about .05 ohms)

Just in case the wiring and or the sensor were rooted i decided to swap it with the other sensor i have (same Bosch type)

Everything is now looking alot better.

I have o2 sensor signal between 0.86 volts to 0.11 volts for normal idle fluctuations

I still have my tune with significantly richer VE % in the MAF smoothing table.
This is think isnt so bad for now but as i really start to fine tune it i might find a leak or two thats part of the reason it was so lean.
The only other conclusion i have is that its because i have a Montero 482 maf.

Anyway here is some data extract showing the o2 signal staying strong and rich when load applied.

The real test of this will be going for a drive. Which im planning to do soon.

9265
9266

Dougal
01-01-2017, 07:29 PM
Took car for drive.

o2 signal is fine now. Holds steady throughout driving.

Car has a really nasty knock (9 counts) but no knock voltage except for a small blip here and there (0.058 volts).

The only way i have been able to quell it was by dropping the target engine load to 100 so the car isnt trying to boost over wastegate spring pressure.

I ran out of time but was going to pull some ignition timing advance in the knock area.

Seems to knock at 3000-3500rpm at ecuload 100 or over. Boost spikes at that point also.

Knock voltage is zero and only randomly shows any signal all very low signal anyway.

The knock its recording is quite severe and car basically goes into limp mode.
Only way to run it is to shut it off and wait for the power to cease to the ecu.

If try and drive the car with it then the compressors surge and hoot like an owl.
This is the same issue ive had had from when i started with tuning the Chrome ecu.
Also same issue as posted here
http://www.3sgto.org/threads/16039-Chrome-v2-Limp-mode-at-3000-rpm

I am going to go back to check knock sensor circuit and also try running my stock 92 GTO ecu.
Not sure that will work either considering Montero MAF, full vac delete done, egr delete and all the other peripheries are on and off to suit my setup with the Chrome ecu.



9270

9271

Dougal
01-02-2017, 01:51 AM
Looks like I have been able to answer the question of why i am getting knock by simply reading a post I created here a year ago!

Its my knock sensor signal that's causing this knock.

I don't have any knock sensor signal as i can confirm no continuity from the sensor ecu side harness to the ecu pin 58.

So basically without signal its doing a 7,8,9 knock count dance.

I have no CEL for this? Which is a bit odd but then again i did not have a CEL for the o2 sensor signal either.

Upon inspection of the knock sensor wiring i can see that its a white wire with a mesh grounding cover around it.

I need to ensure that this white wire signal to pin 58 and that the grounding mesh grounds to chassis ground so it does not suffer any interference on the way through to the ecu.

Somewhere on this wiring circuit there is a break in connection or a really poor ground that is causing me issues.

I have my fingers crossed on this now as i have been around and around with this car for a couple of years now and its killing me that its not running well with all the sensors and there specific nuances.

Dougal
01-02-2017, 04:45 AM
Been doing a heap of reading up on this issue.

So basically with the lack of knock sensor signal the ECU will go into limp mode at approx 3000rpm (perhaps over 100 ecuload)

I should have a CEL coming up however I have a feeling that because I have the Chrome Mod CEL on knock turned off that this might be why my CEL light is not coming on.
I tried checking DTC's but no codes came up but i got a J2534 Read Error. (Might need to see if i have the most updated Evoscan version perhaps)

Dougal
01-03-2017, 12:23 AM
Life is good again!

Knock sensor online.

Wow that took some trial and error in that the wiring was very bad. Found one of those crimp things on the wiring all green and dirty. plenty of gunk on it.

Did a resistance test from the sensor back to the ecu pin and all good. Re-grounded the outer shield stuff too.

Good knock sensor signal now.

Also updated to evoscan 2.9.0100 and DTC's came back with no codes all clear.

Next up is a test drive and we shall see if the 7,8,9 knock limp mode is gone.
9274

cobrakiller1994
07-08-2017, 05:55 PM
I have a problem with my front o2 dropping out sometimes. When its working my trims are bouncing close to zero. My lows and mids settle around 4 in the front an -4 in the back. Then my front o2 will drop out randomly and make the front trims peak to 12.5 messing everything up. I changed the front to a new denso sensor and today out cruising around did the same thing. Car seems to still run fine but then i checked my trims they were maxed out. I was thinking about running it off just the rear sensor but it seems like the front would run a little lean then since the rear bank is pulling some fuel while the front is adding some.

Dougal
07-10-2017, 03:52 AM
My issues were quite severe. The knock sensor drop outs caused by sensor grounds in poor condition and having high resistance. That really screws the signals the ECU is getting. Drop outs common.

Probing the wiring to locate the bad wiring was difficult. My wiring harness has been hacked up alot. Its a 25 year old loom ripped out of a half cut that had spent time in a snowy paddock in Japan. Then it was bent,twisted and forced into my Magna. Im surprised it actually ran my car at all!

I'm running with only the rear o2 sensor activated in my Chrome v2 ECU as my motor is a 92 JDM GTO that only used one single o2 sensor placed after the pipes have merged positioned in front of the Catalytic converter.
Im not too concerned about slight variance between front o2 and rear o2 for trims.
If i was able to use and log both front and back it would be nice however based of my current STFT my LTFT low and mid trims datalogged I know my tune is in the right region within 5%+/-
The more I fine tune them via MAF Smoothing the closer my actual Wideband AFR matches my High Octane Fuel table at various load and RPM point.

I think if your getting within 5% trims your in the area for both banks to be working well. Try switching to rear o2 only. Check your wideband as you go and see how the car reacts on idle and cruising.

How are you adjusting fuelling for your tune?