View Full Version : Brakes Stock Caliper BBK Kits
flewis763
03-02-2015, 09:12 AM
Ok guys, I officially am releasing my stock caliper BBK kits. If you are on FB you have probably seen them before. The purchase page is here
http://www.3sgto.org/parts-sale/15245-stock-caliper-big-brake-kits-vr4%7D.html#post307906
I can answer any questions needed. Thanks
Freddy.
flewis763
03-03-2015, 10:52 AM
bump for interest. I got 5 people for sure so far. need 20 to run the first batch. any questions feel free to ask.
green-lantern
03-03-2015, 03:00 PM
Cool idea
flewis763
03-03-2015, 03:54 PM
Cool idea
Thanks. not really a new idea, its common on many platforms, I just made them for ours. It provides a large increase in braking for a very cheap price. total upgrade cost is as low as 600 bucks.
Disrupter
03-05-2015, 07:44 AM
Ill jump in when it gets closer to the goal or will buy a set to make it happen. Just did a full refresh on my 1g vr4 so dont need them, but kinda want them.
green-lantern
03-05-2015, 09:46 AM
Thanks. not really a new idea, its common on many platforms, I just made them for ours. It provides a large increase in braking for a very cheap price. total upgrade cost is as low as 600 bucks.
Do you know if/how much this will throw the brake bias off? Say I was to just do the rears, any idea how much of the braking power if any would transfer to the rear? I'm assuming it wouldn't be much.
sergechronos
03-05-2015, 10:00 AM
Do you know if/how much this will throw the brake bias off? Say I was to just do the rears, any idea how much of the braking power if any would transfer to the rear? I'm assuming it wouldn't be much.
larger rotors will always change the brake torque applied and technically would need a prop valve to readjust for maximum performance. Would take some actual math to determine change based on rotor diameter, but yes it will move brake bias towards the back of the car. It's a pretty substantial increase in rotor diameter. Rough rule of thumb (obviously other factors in play) would be a ~3" change in rotor diameter (like going from factory 11" to 14") would have the same effect as changing the caliper pistons diameter by about 1/4". So to maintain your current bias, you either need an adjustable prop valve, upsize the rear calipers, or use a crappier compound for either the rear pads or the rear tires to reduce coefficient of friction relative to front.
flewis763
03-05-2015, 10:45 AM
the brake bias change is fairly minimal. on a 1g is basically a 4% shift to the rear based on rotor sizes. on a 2g its a little over 5%. all in all the slight change to the rear actually helps reduce brake understeer.
adding a proportioning valve on an abs system doesn't work the best. it is easier to adjust the feel with a brake pad change. if you feel the rear is braking to hard, you can change the rear to a less aggressive pad or change the front to a more aggressive pad.
overall it is a small change and does not change the braking feel really on the car, just adds a lot more braking.
flewis763
03-05-2015, 10:49 AM
Ill jump in when it gets closer to the goal or will buy a set to make it happen. Just did a full refresh on my 1g vr4 so dont need them, but kinda want them.
it works with stock calipers and pad, only the rotors need to be changed.
green-lantern
03-05-2015, 11:01 AM
the brake bias change is fairly minimal. on a 1g is basically a 4% shift to the rear based on rotor sizes. on a 2g its a little over 5%. all in all the slight change to the rear actually helps reduce brake understeer.
adding a proportioning valve on an abs system doesn't work the best. it is easier to adjust the feel with a brake pad change. if you feel the rear is braking to hard, you can change the rear to a less aggressive pad or change the front to a more aggressive pad.
overall it is a small change and does not change the braking feel really on the car, just adds a lot more braking.
Reason why I ask is I have the XYZ BBK on the front and I think the bias is just +2%. I might be interested in the rears, how close are you to getting enough people to make a run?
Disrupter
03-05-2015, 11:03 AM
Oh I meant I just got dimpled and slotted rotors put on and have about 50 miles on them with Hawk pads. Would be a waste to just swap them out, I will buy your kit to have when I burn through my current setup. I do want to try out some road course, drag, and autox.
sergechronos
03-05-2015, 01:22 PM
the brake bias change is fairly minimal. on a 1g is basically a 4% shift to the rear based on rotor sizes. on a 2g its a little over 5%. all in all the slight change to the rear actually helps reduce brake understeer.
adding a proportioning valve on an abs system doesn't work the best. it is easier to adjust the feel with a brake pad change. if you feel the rear is braking to hard, you can change the rear to a less aggressive pad or change the front to a more aggressive pad.
overall it is a small change and does not change the braking feel really on the car, just adds a lot more braking.
Would require actual measurement of where the midpoint of the braking area on the larger rotors would be compared to the stock pads. Upsizing the rotor moves the point outwards, assuming that all else stays the same, this changes the forces dramatically. If we assume a single piston design for the rears, the coefficient of friction times the force applied times the radius determines the torque generated (and in effect the brake bias.)
On a 1G car with the same effective front and rear brake rotor radius and factory prop valve (with a working ABS system) increasing rotor diameter should add probably 20-30 percent more brake torque to the rear than before, the fronts would get a larger increase since the prop valve doesn't effect them (ie, they still get the 1100psi generated with the brake booster, where as the rear is increasing in a non-linear function after approximately 600psi) so probably safe to say that the fronts would generate and increased brake torque of at least 30%.
Assuming the front is generating a clamp load of 9304.75lbs, a coefficient of friction of .45 (reasonable assumption for OEM) for two pads gives us 8374.27. Factor in the mid point of the braking face as the radius for the torque, you get about 3.75" for the factory, and approximately 6" for the 370Z (in class so can't measure till I get home from work late tonight) which means about 1/3', and about 1/2' radius (conversion gives us result in matching units to provide ft/lbs) for a final brake torque of approx 2471ft/lbs stock for a 1G, and 4187.135 with the 370Z rotors (which would be close to a 60% increase.) 2Gs would likely see close to a 30% increase in braking torque (don't recall off hand what their rotor size is, 10" or 11"?)
The rears don't see such a substantial change as they have a smaller total piston diameter (with a single 1 1/2" on 1G rears, and a pair of 1.5" on 2Gs) and obviously less pressure.
Even at 1100psi, you're looking at a clamp load of 1943lbs for a 1G, and 3886lbs for a 2G.
Assuming same .45 coefficient of friction, and the radii will also be roughly the same, you're looking at about 273ft/lb 1G, approximately 1092.93 for a 2G.
Moving the radius out for the larger rotors, you get
about 437.175 ft/lb for a 1G
about 1748.7 ft/lb for a 2G
Obviously, actually being able to measure would make a difference (since ball parked at just under 10" for the 1G fronts and right around 14" for the 370Zs, as would the real line pressures heading to the calipers in the rear (since that alters the clamp load for the rear.) Rear difference should be closer together since they don't get full line pressure, as is it's 50-60% difference from stock. Overall brake bias shouldn't be unbearable if doing all 4, however I don't know that you will get a compound with a big enough coefficient of friction difference to compensate. a .5CoF (which would be rather high) on the front would net 4652ft/lbs with the Z rotors, and going as low as a .4 CoF (if there is such a thing) puts you at 3791.5ft/lbs. It'd require knowing the coefficient of friction for whichever pad you go with and doing the math to determine that the ratio between front and rear stays approximately the same or nearly, as well as the expense of trialing different combos to find the one you like, to say nothing of the fact that generally high CoF compounds are race style compounds that require heat to perform at that level and as such may make for an unsettled (or uneven) experience.
Of course, setting prop valves isn't a safe and easy matter either since it requires high speed braking with an untested set up.
All that said, for those wishing to do a complete swap and who have already exceeded the limitations of the stock rotors, this is a great solution without the expense of a full on BBK. If someone else wants to do the actual measurements on rotors and pads and such to do the math and determine it all, that'd be great. Or of course, if there's formula or results that I've gotten wrong, please feel free to point those out as well so that we can make sure that all that we have is correct info (since there's not a ton of it out there for the brakes or these kinds of upgrades.)
green-lantern
03-05-2015, 01:29 PM
Jeremy?
flewis763
03-05-2015, 02:16 PM
Would require actual measurement of where the midpoint of the braking area on the larger rotors would be compared to the stock pads. Upsizing the rotor moves the point outwards, assuming that all else stays the same, this changes the forces dramatically. If we assume a single piston design for the rears, the coefficient of friction times the force applied times the radius determines the torque generated (and in effect the brake bias.)
On a 1G car with the same effective front and rear brake rotor radius and factory prop valve (with a working ABS system) increasing rotor diameter should add probably 20-30 percent more brake torque to the rear than before, the fronts would get a larger increase since the prop valve doesn't effect them (ie, they still get the 1100psi generated with the brake booster, where as the rear is increasing in a non-linear function after approximately 600psi) so probably safe to say that the fronts would generate and increased brake torque of at least 30%.
Assuming the front is generating a clamp load of 9304.75lbs, a coefficient of friction of .45 (reasonable assumption for OEM) for two pads gives us 8374.27. Factor in the mid point of the braking face as the radius for the torque, you get about 3.75" for the factory, and approximately 6" for the 370Z (in class so can't measure till I get home from work late tonight) which means about 1/3', and about 1/2' radius (conversion gives us result in matching units to provide ft/lbs) for a final brake torque of approx 2471ft/lbs stock for a 1G, and 4187.135 with the 370Z rotors (which would be close to a 60% increase.) 2Gs would likely see close to a 30% increase in braking torque (don't recall off hand what their rotor size is, 10" or 11"?)
The rears don't see such a substantial change as they have a smaller total piston diameter (with a single 1 1/2" on 1G rears, and a pair of 1.5" on 2Gs) and obviously less pressure.
Even at 1100psi, you're looking at a clamp load of 1943lbs for a 1G, and 3886lbs for a 2G.
Assuming same .45 coefficient of friction, and the radii will also be roughly the same, you're looking at about 273ft/lb 1G, approximately 1092.93 for a 2G.
Moving the radius out for the larger rotors, you get
about 437.175 ft/lb for a 1G
about 1748.7 ft/lb for a 2G
Obviously, actually being able to measure would make a difference (since ball parked at just under 10" for the 1G fronts and right around 14" for the 370Zs, as would the real line pressures heading to the calipers in the rear (since that alters the clamp load for the rear.) Rear difference should be closer together since they don't get full line pressure, as is it's 50-60% difference from stock. Overall brake bias shouldn't be unbearable if doing all 4, however I don't know that you will get a compound with a big enough coefficient of friction difference to compensate. a .5CoF (which would be rather high) on the front would net 4652ft/lbs with the Z rotors, and going as low as a .4 CoF (if there is such a thing) puts you at 3791.5ft/lbs. It'd require knowing the coefficient of friction for whichever pad you go with and doing the math to determine that the ratio between front and rear stays approximately the same or nearly, as well as the expense of trialing different combos to find the one you like, to say nothing of the fact that generally high CoF compounds are race style compounds that require heat to perform at that level and as such may make for an unsettled (or uneven) experience.
Of course, setting prop valves isn't a safe and easy matter either since it requires high speed braking with an untested set up.
All that said, for those wishing to do a complete swap and who have already exceeded the limitations of the stock rotors, this is a great solution without the expense of a full on BBK. If someone else wants to do the actual measurements on rotors and pads and such to do the math and determine it all, that'd be great. Or of course, if there's formula or results that I've gotten wrong, please feel free to point those out as well so that we can make sure that all that we have is correct info (since there's not a ton of it out there for the brakes or these kinds of upgrades.)
yes there is so many variables it is hard to say exactly. I basic numbers are just off rotor size overall different generating an increase in leverage. as for the center of the caliper difference that is simple, all the brackets are just one minus the other divided by 2. so a 2g from would be 355-314=41/2=20.5mm. that how far the caliper center moved up. id have to measure what the oem center is though. pad friction can play a huge roll in the real world calculation of it as well. overall though it is not a huge difference and is much better than just going a large front upgrade only. that can cause bad braking understeer.
overall it is a pretty good package. its not really a track setup but for an aggressive street driver that goes to the track a few times a year it is a big upgrade for the buck.
flewis763
03-05-2015, 02:19 PM
Reason why I ask is I have the XYZ BBK on the front and I think the bias is just +2%. I might be interested in the rears, how close are you to getting enough people to make a run?
I would like to start machining next week. I have had a few guys that want just the rear because they already have the fronts done with other kits too. besides the braking increase, you also have a cooling increase do to the increase in surface area per revolution. that will help eliminate fade on the track quite a bit.
green-lantern
03-05-2015, 03:58 PM
you also have a cooling increase do to the increase in surface area per revolution. that will help eliminate fade on the track quite a bit.
Honestly to me this seems like it's main advantage with this kit, and mainly what I'm interested in. I'll probably have to do some digging before I commit. I'd like to get a better idea what the bias would be.
Thanks
flewis763
03-05-2015, 04:54 PM
Honestly to me this seems like it's main advantage with this kit, and mainly what I'm interested in. I'll probably have to do some digging before I commit. I'd like to get a better idea what the bias would be.
Thanks
what size are you running up front now, 356mm?
flewis763
03-05-2015, 05:05 PM
also for some more pics of the rotors side by side and on top of each other here ya go. these are with 2g rotors.
sergechronos
03-05-2015, 05:24 PM
I'll throw a few of my own in here, this is against 1G fronts and rears
http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/15/03/05/925607dcc1c7619a3ee8acdf369a65fa.jpg
http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/15/03/05/cd945c87c773d9014122dda5f02eff37.jpg
flewis763
03-05-2015, 07:29 PM
I'll throw a few of my own in here, this is against 1G fronts and rears
http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/15/03/05/925607dcc1c7619a3ee8acdf369a65fa.jpg
http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/15/03/05/cd945c87c773d9014122dda5f02eff37.jpg
cts v calipers are the next thing I am working on using the same rotor. it will be more of a track upgrade. idk how soon ill get to it though. I still need to order the calipers.
sergechronos
03-05-2015, 07:34 PM
Already working on it, on a hold for the next few weeks until spring break most likrly
flewis763
03-08-2015, 10:01 PM
bump for the brackets kit. I will be keeping pre orders open for 1 more week before I start machining.
MDoe8
03-09-2015, 04:44 PM
i want to invet in this just for looks alone! Unfortunately I don't have any room to throw money at the car :(
hated
03-11-2015, 03:13 PM
I haven't received the invoice. Please advise.
flewis763
03-11-2015, 04:20 PM
I put them out for one more week so I didn't end up doing the invoices sunday night. I am out of town for work till friday. I will invoice this weekend and the machine shop is going to start cutting on Monday.
mb7050
03-12-2015, 07:48 AM
Do you think these rotors would work ? Seller says they are for the 370Z with sport brakes.. What are the OEM nissan part numbers for the sport rotors ?
Nissan 370Z 09 14 Complete Brake Kit Front and Rear Disc Rotors WBR | eBay (http://www.ebay.com/itm/351338923207?item=351338923207&viewitem=&vxp=mtr)
flewis763
03-12-2015, 08:31 AM
They should. I'll look up the oem part numbers, I don't remember off hand
flewis763
03-13-2015, 09:44 AM
Do you think these rotors would work ? Seller says they are for the 370Z with sport brakes.. What are the OEM nissan part numbers for the sport rotors ?
Nissan 370Z 09 14 Complete Brake Kit Front and Rear Disc Rotors WBR | eBay (http://www.ebay.com/itm/351338923207?item=351338923207&viewitem=&vxp=mtr)
I still needed to fine these for ya.
flewis763
03-13-2015, 09:44 AM
if anyone else is interested let me know buy sunday. machining for this batch starts Monday.
flewis763
03-15-2015, 10:09 PM
finishing up invoices right now. if anyone else wants them please let me know asap. machining starts tomorrow.
hated
03-16-2015, 11:10 AM
Anyway to confirm fitment on 17's? I'm still on stock rims.
flewis763
03-16-2015, 11:22 AM
I replied to that in one of the threads I don't remember which, im not sure. in general youll need 18s. some 17s may work but it will be very very close. you may have to grind down the top of the caliper just a bit to make it work. I will go measure the distance left on my 19s and see how close youll be.
flewis763
03-16-2015, 01:01 PM
Anyway to confirm fitment on 17's? I'm still on stock rims.
ok I just sent you a pm as well but here are my findings. I just went and measures the distance from the caliper to the rim on my 19s. there is 1.15 inches between. This means it very well may fit the oem 17s. if it hits a tiny bit of grinding on the top of the caliper would allow for the room. there is plenty of metal there to remove a little if needed.
hated
03-18-2015, 03:02 AM
What 19's are you running?
flewis763
03-18-2015, 09:00 AM
What 19's are you running?
mine are MRR ground force gf06.
flewis763
04-06-2015, 09:00 AM
hopefully I will have everything by Friday and will ship out Monday a week from today. took longer than expected to make the parts and get them coated. everyone is very busy right now so it took longer to make parts then I would have a few months ago.
flewis763
04-20-2015, 08:33 AM
i apologize guys, I was out of town all week and forgot my laptop. I was wrong on my last post, they got these parts mixed up with the stuff I was going for work that was going to be finished. im going to call them this morning and see the eta for the brackets. im very sorry for the delay, I really thought I could get them out sooner.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.